10,759 research outputs found
Structure Learning in Coupled Dynamical Systems and Dynamic Causal Modelling
Identifying a coupled dynamical system out of many plausible candidates, each
of which could serve as the underlying generator of some observed measurements,
is a profoundly ill posed problem that commonly arises when modelling real
world phenomena. In this review, we detail a set of statistical procedures for
inferring the structure of nonlinear coupled dynamical systems (structure
learning), which has proved useful in neuroscience research. A key focus here
is the comparison of competing models of (ie, hypotheses about) network
architectures and implicit coupling functions in terms of their Bayesian model
evidence. These methods are collectively referred to as dynamical casual
modelling (DCM). We focus on a relatively new approach that is proving
remarkably useful; namely, Bayesian model reduction (BMR), which enables rapid
evaluation and comparison of models that differ in their network architecture.
We illustrate the usefulness of these techniques through modelling
neurovascular coupling (cellular pathways linking neuronal and vascular
systems), whose function is an active focus of research in neurobiology and the
imaging of coupled neuronal systems
Learning Discriminative Bayesian Networks from High-dimensional Continuous Neuroimaging Data
Due to its causal semantics, Bayesian networks (BN) have been widely employed
to discover the underlying data relationship in exploratory studies, such as
brain research. Despite its success in modeling the probability distribution of
variables, BN is naturally a generative model, which is not necessarily
discriminative. This may cause the ignorance of subtle but critical network
changes that are of investigation values across populations. In this paper, we
propose to improve the discriminative power of BN models for continuous
variables from two different perspectives. This brings two general
discriminative learning frameworks for Gaussian Bayesian networks (GBN). In the
first framework, we employ Fisher kernel to bridge the generative models of GBN
and the discriminative classifiers of SVMs, and convert the GBN parameter
learning to Fisher kernel learning via minimizing a generalization error bound
of SVMs. In the second framework, we employ the max-margin criterion and build
it directly upon GBN models to explicitly optimize the classification
performance of the GBNs. The advantages and disadvantages of the two frameworks
are discussed and experimentally compared. Both of them demonstrate strong
power in learning discriminative parameters of GBNs for neuroimaging based
brain network analysis, as well as maintaining reasonable representation
capacity. The contributions of this paper also include a new Directed Acyclic
Graph (DAG) constraint with theoretical guarantee to ensure the graph validity
of GBN.Comment: 16 pages and 5 figures for the article (excluding appendix
Modeling Dynamic Functional Connectivity with Latent Factor Gaussian Processes
Dynamic functional connectivity, as measured by the time-varying covariance
of neurological signals, is believed to play an important role in many aspects
of cognition. While many methods have been proposed, reliably establishing the
presence and characteristics of brain connectivity is challenging due to the
high dimensionality and noisiness of neuroimaging data. We present a latent
factor Gaussian process model which addresses these challenges by learning a
parsimonious representation of connectivity dynamics. The proposed model
naturally allows for inference and visualization of time-varying connectivity.
As an illustration of the scientific utility of the model, application to a
data set of rat local field potential activity recorded during a complex
non-spatial memory task provides evidence of stimuli differentiation
Comparing families of dynamic causal models
Mathematical models of scientific data can be formally compared using Bayesian model evidence. Previous applications in the biological sciences have mainly focussed on model selection in which one first selects the model with the highest evidence and then makes inferences based on the parameters of that model. This “best model” approach is very useful but can become brittle if there are a large number of models to compare, and if different subjects use different models. To overcome this shortcoming we propose the combination of two further approaches: (i) family level inference and (ii) Bayesian model averaging within families. Family level inference removes uncertainty about aspects of model structure other than the characteristic of interest. For example: What are the inputs to the system? Is processing serial or parallel? Is it linear or nonlinear? Is it mediated by a single, crucial connection? We apply Bayesian model averaging within families to provide inferences about parameters that are independent of further assumptions about model structure. We illustrate the methods using Dynamic Causal Models of brain imaging data
Knowing what you know in brain segmentation using Bayesian deep neural networks
In this paper, we describe a Bayesian deep neural network (DNN) for
predicting FreeSurfer segmentations of structural MRI volumes, in minutes
rather than hours. The network was trained and evaluated on a large dataset (n
= 11,480), obtained by combining data from more than a hundred different sites,
and also evaluated on another completely held-out dataset (n = 418). The
network was trained using a novel spike-and-slab dropout-based variational
inference approach. We show that, on these datasets, the proposed Bayesian DNN
outperforms previously proposed methods, in terms of the similarity between the
segmentation predictions and the FreeSurfer labels, and the usefulness of the
estimate uncertainty of these predictions. In particular, we demonstrated that
the prediction uncertainty of this network at each voxel is a good indicator of
whether the network has made an error and that the uncertainty across the whole
brain can predict the manual quality control ratings of a scan. The proposed
Bayesian DNN method should be applicable to any new network architecture for
addressing the segmentation problem.Comment: Submitted to Frontiers in Neuroinformatic
Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data using Bayesian nonparametric binary regression
In this work we perform a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data, consisting of
locations of peak activations identified in 162 separate studies on emotion.
Neuroimaging meta-analyses are typically performed using kernel-based methods.
However, these methods require the width of the kernel to be set a priori and
to be constant across the brain. To address these issues, we propose a fully
Bayesian nonparametric binary regression method to perform neuroimaging
meta-analyses. In our method, each location (or voxel) has a probability of
being a peak activation, and the corresponding probability function is based on
a spatially adaptive Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF). We also include
parameters in the model to robustify the procedure against miscoding of the
voxel response. Posterior inference is implemented using efficient MCMC
algorithms extended from those introduced in Holmes and Held [Bayesian Anal. 1
(2006) 145--168]. Our method allows the probability function to be locally
adaptive with respect to the covariates, that is, to be smooth in one region of
the covariate space and wiggly or even discontinuous in another. Posterior
miscoding probabilities for each of the identified voxels can also be obtained,
identifying voxels that may have been falsely classified as being activated.
Simulation studies and application to the emotion neuroimaging data indicate
that our method is superior to standard kernel-based methods.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS523 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
- …