4,964 research outputs found
DeltaPhish: Detecting Phishing Webpages in Compromised Websites
The large-scale deployment of modern phishing attacks relies on the automatic
exploitation of vulnerable websites in the wild, to maximize profit while
hindering attack traceability, detection and blacklisting. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first work that specifically leverages this adversarial
behavior for detection purposes. We show that phishing webpages can be
accurately detected by highlighting HTML code and visual differences with
respect to other (legitimate) pages hosted within a compromised website. Our
system, named DeltaPhish, can be installed as part of a web application
firewall, to detect the presence of anomalous content on a website after
compromise, and eventually prevent access to it. DeltaPhish is also robust
against adversarial attempts in which the HTML code of the phishing page is
carefully manipulated to evade detection. We empirically evaluate it on more
than 5,500 webpages collected in the wild from compromised websites, showing
that it is capable of detecting more than 99% of phishing webpages, while only
misclassifying less than 1% of legitimate pages. We further show that the
detection rate remains higher than 70% even under very sophisticated attacks
carefully designed to evade our system.Comment: Preprint version of the work accepted at ESORICS 201
High Accuracy Phishing Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Networks
The persistent growth in phishing and the rising volume of phishing websites has led to individuals and organizations worldwide becoming increasingly exposed to various cyber-attacks. Consequently, more effective phishing detection is required for improved cyber defence. Hence, in this paper we present a deep learning-based approach to enable high accuracy detection of phishing sites. The proposed approach utilizes convolutional neural networks (CNN) for high accuracy classification to distinguish genuine sites from phishing sites. We evaluate the models using a dataset obtained from 6,157 genuine and 4,898 phishing websites. Based on the results of extensive experiments, our CNN based models proved to be highly effective in detecting unknown phishing sites. Furthermore, the CNN based approach performed better than traditional machine learning classifiers evaluated on the same dataset, reaching 98.2% phishing detection rate with an F1-score of 0.976. The method presented in this pa-per compares favourably to the state-of-the art in deep learning based phishing website detection
Analyzing Social and Stylometric Features to Identify Spear phishing Emails
Spear phishing is a complex targeted attack in which, an attacker harvests
information about the victim prior to the attack. This information is then used
to create sophisticated, genuine-looking attack vectors, drawing the victim to
compromise confidential information. What makes spear phishing different, and
more powerful than normal phishing, is this contextual information about the
victim. Online social media services can be one such source for gathering vital
information about an individual. In this paper, we characterize and examine a
true positive dataset of spear phishing, spam, and normal phishing emails from
Symantec's enterprise email scanning service. We then present a model to detect
spear phishing emails sent to employees of 14 international organizations, by
using social features extracted from LinkedIn. Our dataset consists of 4,742
targeted attack emails sent to 2,434 victims, and 9,353 non targeted attack
emails sent to 5,912 non victims; and publicly available information from their
LinkedIn profiles. We applied various machine learning algorithms to this
labeled data, and achieved an overall maximum accuracy of 97.76% in identifying
spear phishing emails. We used a combination of social features from LinkedIn
profiles, and stylometric features extracted from email subjects, bodies, and
attachments. However, we achieved a slightly better accuracy of 98.28% without
the social features. Our analysis revealed that social features extracted from
LinkedIn do not help in identifying spear phishing emails. To the best of our
knowledge, this is one of the first attempts to make use of a combination of
stylometric features extracted from emails, and social features extracted from
an online social network to detect targeted spear phishing emails.Comment: Detection of spear phishing using social media feature
Artificial intelligence in the cyber domain: Offense and defense
Artificial intelligence techniques have grown rapidly in recent years, and their applications in practice can be seen in many fields, ranging from facial recognition to image analysis. In the cybersecurity domain, AI-based techniques can provide better cyber defense tools and help adversaries improve methods of attack. However, malicious actors are aware of the new prospects too and will probably attempt to use them for nefarious purposes. This survey paper aims at providing an overview of how artificial intelligence can be used in the context of cybersecurity in both offense and defense.Web of Science123art. no. 41
An Evasion Attack against ML-based Phishing URL Detectors
Background: Over the year, Machine Learning Phishing URL classification
(MLPU) systems have gained tremendous popularity to detect phishing URLs
proactively. Despite this vogue, the security vulnerabilities of MLPUs remain
mostly unknown. Aim: To address this concern, we conduct a study to understand
the test time security vulnerabilities of the state-of-the-art MLPU systems,
aiming at providing guidelines for the future development of these systems.
Method: In this paper, we propose an evasion attack framework against MLPU
systems. To achieve this, we first develop an algorithm to generate adversarial
phishing URLs. We then reproduce 41 MLPU systems and record their baseline
performance. Finally, we simulate an evasion attack to evaluate these MLPU
systems against our generated adversarial URLs. Results: In comparison to
previous works, our attack is: (i) effective as it evades all the models with
an average success rate of 66% and 85% for famous (such as Netflix, Google) and
less popular phishing targets (e.g., Wish, JBHIFI, Officeworks) respectively;
(ii) realistic as it requires only 23ms to produce a new adversarial URL
variant that is available for registration with a median cost of only
$11.99/year. We also found that popular online services such as Google
SafeBrowsing and VirusTotal are unable to detect these URLs. (iii) We find that
Adversarial training (successful defence against evasion attack) does not
significantly improve the robustness of these systems as it decreases the
success rate of our attack by only 6% on average for all the models. (iv)
Further, we identify the security vulnerabilities of the considered MLPU
systems. Our findings lead to promising directions for future research.
Conclusion: Our study not only illustrate vulnerabilities in MLPU systems but
also highlights implications for future study towards assessing and improving
these systems.Comment: Draft for ACM TOP
- …