Antenna allocation and pricing in virtualized massive MIMO networks via Stackelberg game

We study a resource allocation problem for the uplink of a virtualized massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system, where the antennas at the base station are priced and virtualized among the service providers (SPs). The mobile network operator (MNO) who owns the infrastructure decides the price per antenna, and a Stackelberg game is formulated for the net profit maximization of the MNO, while minimum rate requirements of SPs are satisfied. To solve the bi-level optimization problem of the MNO, we first derive the closed-form best responses of the SPs with respect to the pricing strategies of the MNO, such that the problem of the MNO can be reduced to a single-level optimization. Then, via transformations and approximations, we cast the MNO’s problem with integer constraints into a signomial geometric program (SGP), and we propose an iterative algorithm based on the successive convex approximation (SCA) to solve the SGP. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm has performance close to the global optimum. Moreover, the interactions between the MNO and SPs in different scenarios are explored via simulations

Network efficiency enhancement by reactive channel state based allocation scheme

Now a day the large MIMO has considered as the efficient approach to improve the spectral and energy efficiency at WMN. However, the PC is a big issue that caused by reusing similar pilot sequence at cells, which also restrict the performance of massive MIMO network. Here, we give the alternative answer, where each of UEs required allotting a channel sequences before passing the payload data, so as to avoid the channel collision of inter-cell. Our proposed protocol will ready to determine the channel collisions in distributed and scalable process, however giving unique properties of the large MIMO channels. Here we have proposed a RCSA (Reactive channel state based allocation) scheme, which will very productively work with the RAP blockers at large network of MIMO. The position of time-frequency of RAP blocks is modified in the middle of the adjacent cells, because of this design decision the RAP defend from the hardest types of interference at inter-cell. Further, to validate the performance of our proposed scheme it will be compared with other existing technique

Game-Theoretic Frameworks for the Techno-Economic Aspects of Infrastructure Sharing in Current and Future Mobile Networks

RÉSUMÉ Le phénomène de partage d’infrastructure dans les réseaux mobiles a prévalu au cours des deux dernières décennies. Il a pris de l’ampleur en particulier pendant les deux dernières migrations technologiques, à savoir de la 2G à la 3G et de la 3G à la 4G et il sera encore plus crucial à très court terme avec l’avènement de la 5G. En permettant aux Opérateurs de Réseaux Mobiles (ORM) de faire face à la demande croissante des utilisateurs et à la baisse des revenus. Il n’est pas rare non plus que le partage d’infrastructure s’accompagne du partage du spectre, une ressource essentielle et de plus en plus rare pour les réseaux mobiles. Dans ce milieu, la communauté des chercheurs, parmis d’autres, a étudié les multiples aspects techniques du partage d’infrastructure parfois associés au partage du spectre. Entre autres, ces aspects techniques comprennent l’évaluation des performances en termes de métriques de réseau, de gestion de ressources et d’habilitateurs et d’architectures adaptées. Les aspects économiques ont également été abordés, mais généralement en se concentrant étroitement sur l’estimation des économies de coûts des dfférentes alternatives de partage d’infrastructure. Cependant, lorsqu’on considère le problème du partage d’infrastructure, et le cas échéant aussi du partage du spectre du point de vue d’un ORM, qui est une entité intéressée à maximiser le profit, il est important d’évaluer non seulement la réduction des coûts de cette infrastructure, et le cas échéant aussi le partage du spectre, mais aussi leur impact sur les performances du réseau et par conséquent sur les revenus de l’ORM. De ce point de vue, la viabilité du partage d’infrastructure ne doit pas être prise pour acquise ; afin d’étudier le problème stratégique d’un ORM concluant un accord de partage avec un ou plusieurs autres ORM, les aspects techniques et économiques doivent être pris en compte. Cette étude constitue le premier objectif de ce projet de recherche doctorale. Plus précisément, nous avons considéré plusieurs variantes résultant de deux cas où chaque variante a été abordée par un modèle mathématique approprié. Ces variantes répondent à un scénario 4G commun dans lequel il existe un ensemble de ORM avec des parts de marché données qui coexistent dans une zone géographique urbaine dense ; chaque ORM doit décider s’il faut déployer une couche de petites cellules dans la zone et, le cas échéant, s’il doit le faire lui-même ou en concluant un accord de partage en créant un réseau partagé avec certains, ou la totalité, des autres ORM, auquel cas une coalition est créée. Une caractéristique commune importante de ces variantes est le modèle de tarification de l’utilisateur défini comme une fonction linéaire du taux moyen perçu par l’utilisateur en fonction de la coalition dont fait partie l’ORM de l’utilisateur.----------ABSTRACT The phenomenon of infrastructure sharing in mobile networks has been prevalent over the last two decades. It has gathered momentum especially during the last two technology migrations, i.e., from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G and it will be even more crucial with the advent of 5G. The key rationale behind such phenomenon is cost reduction as a means for Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) to deal with an increasing user demand but declining revenues. It is also not unusual for infrastructure sharing to go hand in hand with sharing of spectrum, an essential and increasingly scarce resource for mobile networks. In this milieu, the research community (but not only) has addressed multiple technical aspects of infrastructure sharing sometimes combined with spectrum sharing. Among others, such technical aspects include performance evaluation in terms of network metrics, resource management and enablers and adapted architectures. Economic aspects have been addressed as well, but usually with a narrow focus on estimating the cost savings of the di˙erent infrastructure sharing alternatives. However, from the perspective of an MNO, which is a self-interested, profit-maximizing entity, it is important to assess not only the cost reduction that infrastructure sharing, and when applicable, also spectrum sharing bring about, but also their impact on the network performance and consequently on the MNO’s revenues. From this perspective, the viability of infrastructure sharing should not be taken for granted; in order to study the strategic problem of an MNO entering a sharing agreement with one or multiple other MNOs, both technical and economic aspects should be taken into account – such study has been the first objective of this doctoral research project. We have specifically considered multiple variants arising from two cases where each variant has been tackled by an appropriate mathematical model. These variants address a common 4G scenario in which there is a set of MNOs with given market shares that coexist in a given dense urban geographical area; each MNO has to decide whether to deploy a layer of small cells in the area and if so, whether to do that by itself or by entering a sharing agreement, i.e., building a shared network with a subset or all other MNOs (in which case a coalition is created). One key common feature of these variants is the user pricing model which is defined as a linear function of the average rate perceived by the user depending on the coalition joined by the user’s MNO; such pricing model allows us to capture the impact that infrastructure sharing, and, when applicable, also spectrum sharing have on the MNO’s revenues through a network performance metric. In turn, the two key outcomes of the models tackling these variants are the set of coalitions and the number of small cells they deploy