Radiation-Induced Error Criticality in Modern HPC Parallel Accelerators

In this paper, we evaluate the error criticality of radiation-induced errors on modern High-Performance Computing (HPC) accelerators (Intel Xeon Phi and NVIDIA K40) through a dedicated set of metrics. We show that, as long as imprecise computing is concerned, the simple mismatch detection is not sufficient to evaluate and compare the radiation sensitivity of HPC devices and algorithms. Our analysis quantifies and qualifies radiation effects on applications’ output correlating the number of corrupted elements with their spatial locality. Also, we provide the mean relative error (dataset-wise) to evaluate radiation-induced error magnitude. We apply the selected metrics to experimental results obtained in various radiation test campaigns for a total of more than 400 hours of beam time per device. The amount of data we gathered allows us to evaluate the error criticality of a representative set of algorithms from HPC suites. Additionally, based on the characteristics of the tested algorithms, we draw generic reliability conclusions for broader classes of codes. We show that arithmetic operations are less critical for the K40, while Xeon Phi is more reliable when executing particles interactions solved through Finite Difference Methods. Finally, iterative stencil operations seem the most reliable on both architectures.This work was supported by the STIC-AmSud/CAPES scientific cooperation program under the EnergySFE research project grant 99999.007556/2015-02, EU H2020 Programme, and MCTI/RNP-Brazil under the HPC4E Project, grant agreement n° 689772. Tested K40 boards were donated thanks to Steve Keckler, Timothy Tsai, and Siva Hari from NVIDIA.Postprint (author's final draft

Characterizing a Neutron-Induced Fault Model for Deep Neural Networks

International audienceThe reliability evaluation of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) executed on Graphic Processing Units (GPUs) is a challenging problem since the hardware architecture is highly complex and the software frameworks are composed of many layers of abstraction. While software-level fault injection is a common and fast way to evaluate the reliability of complex applications, it may produce unrealistic results since it has limited access to the hardware resources and the adopted fault models may be too naive (i.e., single and double bit flip). Contrarily, physical fault injection with neutron beam provides realistic error rates but lacks fault propagation visibility. This paper proposes a characterization of the DNN fault model combining both neutron beam experiments and fault injection at software level. We exposed GPUs running General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) and DNNs to beam neutrons to measure their error rate. On DNNs, we observe that the percentage of critical errors can be up to 61%, and show that ECC is ineffective in reducing critical errors. We then performed a complementary software-level fault injection, using fault models derived from RTL simulations. Our results show that by injecting complex fault models, the YOLOv3 misdetection rate is validated to be very close to the rate measured with beam experiments, which is 8.66× higher than the one measured with fault injection using only single-bit flips

Revealing GPUs Vulnerabilities by Combining Register-Transfer and Software-Level Fault Injection

The complexity of both hardware and software makes GPUs reliability evaluation extremely challenging. A low level fault injection on a GPU model, despite being accurate, would take a prohibitively long time (months to years), while software fault injection, despite being quick, cannot access critical resources for GPUs and typically uses synthetic fault models (e.g., single bit-flips) that could result in unrealistic evaluations. This paper proposes to combine the accuracy of Register-Transfer Level (RTL) fault injection with the efficiency of software fault injection. First, on an RTL GPU model (FlexGripPlus), we inject over 1.5 million faults in low-level resources that are unprotected and hidden to the programmer, and characterize their effects on the output of common instructions. We create a pool of possible fault effects on the operation output based on the instruction opcode and input characteristics. We then inject these fault effects, at the application level, using an updated version of a software framework (NVBitFI). Our strategy reduces the fault injection time from the tens of years an RTL evaluation would need to tens of hours, thus allowing, for the first time on GPUs, to track the fault propagation from the hardware to the output of complex applications. Additionally, we provide a more realistic fault model and show that single bit-flip injection would underestimate the error rate of six HPC applications and two convolutional neural networks by up to 48parcent (18parcent on average). The RTL fault models and the injection framework we developed are made available in a public repository to enable third-party evaluations and ease results reproducibility

Characterizing Deep Neural Networks Neutrons-Induced Error Model

International audienceWe characterize the fault models for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in GPUs exposed to neutron. We observe tolerable and critical errors, and show that ECC is not effective in reducing critical errors

New Techniques for On-line Testing and Fault Mitigation in GPUs

L'abstract è presente nell'allegato / the abstract is in the attachmen

Soft Error Effects on Arm Microprocessors: Early Estimations versus Chip Measurements

Extensive research efforts are being carried out to evaluate and improve the reliability of computing devices either through beam experiments or simulation-based fault injection. Unfortunately, it is still largely unclear to which extend fault injection can provide an accurate error rate estimation at early stages and if beam experiments can be used to identify the weakest resources in a device. The importance and challenges associated with a timely, but yet realistic reliability evaluation grow with the increase of complexity in both the hardware domain, with the integration of different types of cores in an SoC (System-on-Chip), and the software domain, with the OS (operating system) required to take full advantage of the available resources. In this paper, we combine and analyze data gathered with extensive beam experiments (on the final physical CPU hardware) and microarchitectural fault injections (on early microarchitectural CPU models). We target a standalone Arm Cortex-A5 CPU and an Arm Cortex-A9 CPU integrated into an SoC and evaluate their reliability in bare-metal and Linux-based configurations. Combining experimental data that covers more than 18 million years of device time with the result of more than 176,000 injections we find that both the SoC integration and the presence of the OS increase the system DUEs (Detected Unrecoverable Errors) rate (for different reasons) but do not significantly impact the SDCs (Silent Data Corruptions) rate which is solely attributed to the CPU core. Our reliability analysis demonstrates that even considering SoC integration and OS inclusion, early, pre-silicon microarchitecture-level fault injection delivers accurate SDC rates estimations and lower bounds for the DUE rates

Analysis and Mitigation of Soft-Errors on High Performance Embedded GPUs

Multiprocessor system-on-chip such as embedded GPUs are becoming very popular in safety-critical applications, such as autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles. However, these devices can suffer from the effects of soft-errors, such as those produced by radiation effects. These effects are able to generate unpredictable misbehaviors. Fault tolerance oriented to multi-threaded software introduces severe performance degradations due to the redundancy, voting and correction threads operations. In this paper, we propose a new fault injection environment for NVIDIA GPGPU devices and a fault tolerance approach based on error detection and correction threads executed during data transfer operations on embedded GPUs. The fault injection environment is capable of automatically injecting faults into the instructions at SASS level by instrumenting the CUDA binary executable file. The mitigation approach is based on concurrent error detection threads running simultaneously with the memory stream device to host data transfer operations. With several benchmark applications, we evaluate the impact of softerrors classifying Silent Data Corruption, Detection, Unrecoverable Error and Hang. Finally, the proposed mitigation approach has been validated by soft-error fault injection campaigns on an NVIDIA Pascal Architecture GPU controlled by Quad-Core A57 ARM processor (JETSON TX2) demonstrating an advantage of more than 37% with respect to state of the art solution

Approximate Computing Strategies for Low-Overhead Fault Tolerance in Safety-Critical Applications

This work studies the reliability of embedded systems with approximate computing on software and hardware designs. It presents approximate computing methods and proposes approximate fault tolerance techniques applied to programmable hardware and embedded software to provide reliability at low computational costs. The objective of this thesis is the development of fault tolerance techniques based on approximate computing and proving that approximate computing can be applied to most safety-critical systems. It starts with an experimental analysis of the reliability of embedded systems used at safety-critical projects. Results show that the reliability of single-core systems, and types of errors they are sensitive to, differ from multicore processing systems. The usage of an operating system and two different parallel programming APIs are also evaluated. Fault injection experiment results show that embedded Linux has a critical impact on the system’s reliability and the types of errors to which it is most sensitive. Traditional fault tolerance techniques and parallel variants of them are evaluated for their fault-masking capability on multicore systems. The work shows that parallel fault tolerance can indeed not only improve execution time but also fault-masking. Lastly, an approximate parallel fault tolerance technique is proposed, where the system abandons faulty execution tasks. This first approximate computing approach to fault tolerance in parallel processing systems was able to improve the reliability and the fault-masking capability of the techniques, significantly reducing errors that would cause system crashes. Inspired by the conflict between the improvements provided by approximate computing and the safety-critical systems requirements, this work presents an analysis of the applicability of approximate computing techniques on critical systems. The proposed techniques are tested under simulation, emulation, and laser fault injection experiments. Results show that approximate computing algorithms do have a particular behavior, different from traditional algorithms. The approximation techniques presented and proposed in this work are also used to develop fault tolerance techniques. Results show that those new approximate fault tolerance techniques are less costly than traditional ones and able to achieve almost the same level of error masking.Este trabalho estuda a confiabilidade de sistemas embarcados com computação aproximada em software e projetos de hardware. Ele apresenta métodos de computação aproximada e técnicas aproximadas para tolerância a falhas em hardware programável e software embarcado que provêem alta confiabilidade a baixos custos computacionais. O objetivo desta tese é o desenvolvimento de técnicas de tolerância a falhas baseadas em computação aproximada e provar que este paradigma pode ser usado em sistemas críticos. O texto começa com uma análise da confiabilidade de sistemas embarcados usados em sistemas de tolerância crítica. Os resultados mostram que a resiliência de sistemas singlecore, e os tipos de erros aos quais eles são mais sensíveis, é diferente dos multi-core. O uso de sistemas operacionais também é analisado, assim como duas APIs de programação paralela. Experimentos de injeção de falhas mostram que o uso de Linux embarcado tem um forte impacto na confiabilidade do sistema. Técnicas tradicionais de tolerância a falhas e variações paralelas das mesmas são avaliadas. O trabalho mostra que técnicas de tolerância a falhas paralelas podem de fato melhorar não apenas o tempo de execução da aplicação, mas também seu mascaramento de erros. Por fim, uma técnica de tolerância a falhas paralela aproximada é proposta, onde o sistema abandona instâncias de execuções que apresentam falhas. Esta primeira experiência com computação aproximada foi capaz de melhorar a confiabilidade das técnicas previamente apresentadas, reduzindo significativamente a ocorrência de erros que provocam um crash total do sistema. Inspirado pelo conflito entre as melhorias trazidas pela computação aproximada e os requisitos dos sistemas críticos, este trabalho apresenta uma análise da aplicabilidade de computação aproximada nestes sistemas. As técnicas propostas são testadas sob experimentos de injeção de falhas por simulação, emulação e laser. Os resultados destes experimentos mostram que algoritmos aproximados possuem um comportamento particular que lhes é inerente, diferente dos tradicionais. As técnicas de aproximação apresentadas e propostas no trabalho são também utilizadas para o desenvolvimento de técnicas de tolerância a falhas aproximadas. Estas novas técnicas possuem um custo menor que as tradicionais e são capazes de atingir o mesmo nível de mascaramento de erros