An FPGA implementation of an investigative many-core processor, Fynbos : in support of a Fortran autoparallelising software pipeline

Includes bibliographical references.In light of the power, memory, ILP, and utilisation walls facing the computing industry, this work examines the hypothetical many-core approach to finding greater compute performance and efficiency. In order to achieve greater efficiency in an environment in which Moore’s law continues but TDP has been capped, a means of deriving performance from dark and dim silicon is needed. The many-core hypothesis is one approach to exploiting these available transistors efficiently. As understood in this work, it involves trading in hardware control complexity for hundreds to thousands of parallel simple processing elements, and operating at a clock speed sufficiently low as to allow the efficiency gains of near threshold voltage operation. Performance is there- fore dependant on exploiting a new degree of fine-grained parallelism such as is currently only found in GPGPUs, but in a manner that is not as restrictive in application domain range. While removing the complex control hardware of traditional CPUs provides space for more arithmetic hardware, a basic level of control is still required. For a number of reasons this work chooses to replace this control largely with static scheduling. This pushes the burden of control primarily to the software and specifically the compiler, rather not to the programmer or to an application specific means of control simplification. An existing legacy tool chain capable of autoparallelising sequential Fortran code to the degree of parallelism necessary for many-core exists. This work implements a many-core architecture to match it. Prototyping the design on an FPGA, it is possible to examine the real world performance of the compiler-architecture system to a greater degree than simulation only would allow. Comparing theoretical peak performance and real performance in a case study application, the system is found to be more efficient than any other reviewed, but to also significantly under perform relative to current competing architectures. This failing is apportioned to taking the need for simple hardware too far, and an inability to implement static scheduling mitigating tactics due to lack of support for such in the compiler

Analytical cost metrics: days of future past

2019 Summer.Includes bibliographical references.Future exascale high-performance computing (HPC) systems are expected to be increasingly heterogeneous, consisting of several multi-core CPUs and a large number of accelerators, special-purpose hardware that will increase the computing power of the system in a very energy-efficient way. Specialized, energy-efficient accelerators are also an important component in many diverse systems beyond HPC: gaming machines, general purpose workstations, tablets, phones and other media devices. With Moore's law driving the evolution of hardware platforms towards exascale, the dominant performance metric (time efficiency) has now expanded to also incorporate power/energy efficiency. This work builds analytical cost models for cost metrics such as time, energy, memory access, and silicon area. These models are used to predict the performance of applications, for performance tuning, and chip design. The idea is to work with domain specific accelerators where analytical cost models can be accurately used for performance optimization. The performance optimization problems are formulated as mathematical optimization problems. This work explores the analytical cost modeling and mathematical optimization approach in a few ways. For stencil applications and GPU architectures, the analytical cost models are developed for execution time as well as energy. The models are used for performance tuning over existing architectures, and are coupled with silicon area models of GPU architectures to generate highly efficient architecture configurations. For matrix chain products, analytical closed form solutions for off-chip data movement are built and used to minimize the total data movement cost of a minimum op count tree

Software for Exascale Computing - SPPEXA 2016-2019

This open access book summarizes the research done and results obtained in the second funding phase of the Priority Program 1648 "Software for Exascale Computing" (SPPEXA) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) presented at the SPPEXA Symposium in Dresden during October 21-23, 2019. In that respect, it both represents a continuation of Vol. 113 in Springer’s series Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, the corresponding report of SPPEXA’s first funding phase, and provides an overview of SPPEXA’s contributions towards exascale computing in today's sumpercomputer technology. The individual chapters address one or more of the research directions (1) computational algorithms, (2) system software, (3) application software, (4) data management and exploration, (5) programming, and (6) software tools. The book has an interdisciplinary appeal: scholars from computational sub-fields in computer science, mathematics, physics, or engineering will find it of particular interest

Evaluating technologies and techniques for transitioning hydrodynamics applications to future generations of supercomputers

Current supercomputer development trends present severe challenges for scientific codebases. Moore’s law continues to hold, however, power constraints have brought an end to Dennard scaling, forcing significant increases in overall concurrency. The performance imbalance between the processor and memory sub-systems is also increasing and architectures are becoming significantly more complex. Scientific computing centres need to harness more computational resources in order to facilitate new scientific insights and maintaining their codebases requires significant investments. Centres therefore have to decide how best to develop their applications to take advantage of future architectures. To prevent vendor "lock-in" and maximise investments, achieving portableperformance across multiple architectures is also a significant concern. Efficiently scaling applications will be essential for achieving improvements in science and the MPI (Message Passing Interface) only model is reaching its scalability limits. Hybrid approaches which utilise shared memory programming models are a promising approach for improving scalability. Additionally PGAS (Partitioned Global Address Space) models have the potential to address productivity and scalability concerns. Furthermore, OpenCL has been developed with the aim of enabling applications to achieve portable-performance across a range of heterogeneous architectures. This research examines approaches for achieving greater levels of performance for hydrodynamics applications on future supercomputer architectures. The development of a Lagrangian-Eulerian hydrodynamics application is presented together with its utility for conducting such research. Strategies for improving application performance, including PGAS- and hybrid-based approaches are evaluated at large node-counts on several state-of-the-art architectures. Techniques to maximise the performance and scalability of OpenMP-based hybrid implementations are presented together with an assessment of how these constructs should be combined with existing approaches. OpenCL is evaluated as an additional technology for implementing a hybrid programming model and improving performance-portability. To enhance productivity several tools for automatically hybridising applications and improving process-to-topology mappings are evaluated. Power constraints are starting to limit supercomputer deployments, potentially necessitating the use of more energy efficient technologies. Advanced processor architectures are therefore evaluated as future candidate technologies, together with several application optimisations which will likely be necessary. An FPGA-based solution is examined, including an analysis of how effectively it can be utilised via a high-level programming model, as an alternative to the specialist approaches which currently limit the applicability of this technology

FPGA structures for high speed and low overhead dynamic circuit specialization

A Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is a programmable digital electronic chip. The FPGA does not come with a predefined function from the manufacturer; instead, the developer has to define its function through implementing a digital circuit on the FPGA resources. The functionality of the FPGA can be reprogrammed as desired and hence the name “field programmable”. FPGAs are useful in small volume digital electronic products as the design of a digital custom chip is expensive. Changing the FPGA (also called configuring it) is done by changing the configuration data (in the form of bitstreams) that defines the FPGA functionality. These bitstreams are stored in a memory of the FPGA called configuration memory. The SRAM cells of LookUp Tables (LUTs), Block Random Access Memories (BRAMs) and DSP blocks together form the configuration memory of an FPGA. The configuration data can be modified according to the user’s needs to implement the user-defined hardware. The simplest way to program the configuration memory is to download the bitstreams using a JTAG interface. However, modern techniques such as Partial Reconfiguration (PR) enable us to configure a part in the configuration memory with partial bitstreams during run-time. The reconfiguration is achieved by swapping in partial bitstreams into the configuration memory via a configuration interface called Internal Configuration Access Port (ICAP). The ICAP is a hardware primitive (macro) present in the FPGA used to access the configuration memory internally by an embedded processor. The reconfiguration technique adds flexibility to use specialized ci rcuits that are more compact and more efficient t han t heir b ulky c ounterparts. An example of such an implementation is the use of specialized multipliers instead of big generic multipliers in an FIR implementation with constant coefficients. To specialize these circuits and reconfigure during the run-time, researchers at the HES group proposed the novel technique called parameterized reconfiguration that can be used to efficiently and automatically implement Dynamic Circuit Specialization (DCS) that is built on top of the Partial Reconfiguration method. It uses the run-time reconfiguration technique that is tailored to implement a parameterized design. An application is said to be parameterized if some of its input values change much less frequently than the rest. These inputs are called parameters. Instead of implementing these parameters as regular inputs, in DCS these inputs are implemented as constants, and the application is optimized for the constants. For every change in parameter values, the design is re-optimized (specialized) during run-time and implemented by reconfiguring the optimized design for a new set of parameters. In DCS, the bitstreams of the parameterized design are expressed as Boolean functions of the parameters. For every infrequent change in parameters, a specialized FPGA configuration is generated by evaluating the corresponding Boolean functions, and the FPGA is reconfigured with the specialized configuration. A detailed study of overheads of DCS and providing suitable solutions with appropriate custom FPGA structures is the primary goal of the dissertation. I also suggest different improvements to the FPGA configuration memory architecture. After offering the custom FPGA structures, I investigated the role of DCS on FPGA overlays and the use of custom FPGA structures that help to reduce the overheads of DCS on FPGA overlays. By doing so, I hope I can convince the developer to use DCS (which now comes with minimal costs) in real-world applications. I start the investigations of overheads of DCS by implementing an adaptive FIR filter (using the DCS technique) on three different Xilinx FPGA platforms: Virtex-II Pro, Virtex-5, and Zynq-SoC. The study of how DCS behaves and what is its overhead in the evolution of the three FPGA platforms is the non-trivial basis to discover the costs of DCS. After that, I propose custom FPGA structures (reconfiguration controllers and reconfiguration drivers) to reduce the main overhead (reconfiguration time) of DCS. These structures not only reduce the reconfiguration time but also help curbing the power hungry part of the DCS system. After these chapters, I study the role of DCS on FPGA overlays. I investigate the effect of the proposed FPGA structures on Virtual-Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Arrays (VCGRAs). I classify the VCGRA implementations into three types: the conventional VCGRA, partially parameterized VCGRA and fully parameterized VCGRA depending upon the level of parameterization. I have designed two variants of VCGRA grids for HPC image processing applications, namely, the MAC grid and Pixie. Finally, I try to tackle the reconfiguration time overhead at the hardware level of the FPGA by customizing the FPGA configuration memory architecture. In this part of my research, I propose to use a parallel memory structure to improve the reconfiguration time of DCS drastically. However, this improvement comes with a significant overhead of hardware resources which will need to be solved in future research on commercial FPGA configuration memory architectures

Three-Dimensional Processing-In-Memory-Architectures: A Holistic Tool For Modeling And Simulation

Die gemeinhin als Memory Wall bekannte, sich stetig weitende Leistungslücke zwischen Prozessor- und Speicherarchitekturen erfordert neue Konzepte, um weiterhin eine Skalierung der Rechenleistung zu ermöglichen. Da Speicher als die Beschränkung innerhalb einer Von-Neumann-Architektur identifiziert wurden, widmet sich die Arbeit dieser Problemstellung. Obgleich dreidimensionale Speicher zu einer Linderung der Memory Wall beitragen können, sind diese alleinig für die zukünftige Skalierung ungenügend. Aufgrund höherer Effizienzen stellt die Integration von Rechenkapazität in den Speicher (Processing-In-Memory, PIM) ein vielversprechender Ausweg dar, jedoch existiert ein Mangel an PIM-Simulationsmodellen. Daher wurde ein flexibles Simulationswerkzeug für dreidimensionale Speicherstapel geschaffen, welches zur Modellierung von dreidimensionalen PIM erweitert wurde. Dieses kann Speicherstapel wie etwa Hybrid Memory Cube standardkonform simulieren und bietet zugleich eine hohe Genauigkeit indem auf elementaren Datenpaketen in Kombination mit dem Hardware validierten Simulator BOBSim modelliert wird. Ein eigens entworfener Simulationstaktbaum ermöglicht zugleich eine schnelle Ausführung. Messungen weisen im funktionalen Modus eine 100-fache Beschleunigung auf, wohingegen eine Verdoppelung der Ausführungsgeschwindigkeit mit Taktgenauigkeit erzielt wird. Anhand eines eigens implementierten, binärkompatiblen GPU-Beschleunigers wird die Modellierung einer vollständig dreidimensionalen PIM-Architektur demonstriert. Dabei orientieren sich die maximalen Hardwareressourcen an einem PIM-Beschleuniger aus der Literatur. Evaluiert wird einerseits das GPU-Simulationsmodell eigenständig, andererseits als PIM-Verbund jeweils mit Hilfe einer repräsentativ gewählten, speicherbeschränkten geophysikalischen Bildverarbeitung. Bei alleiniger Betrachtung des GPU-Simulationsmodells weist dieses eine signifikant gesteigerte Simulationsgeschwindigkeit auf, bei gleichzeitiger Abweichung von 6% gegenüber dem Verilator-Modell. Nachfolgend werden innerhalb dieser Arbeit unterschiedliche Konfigurationen des integrierten PIM-Beschleunigers evaluiert. Je nach gewählter Konfiguration kann der genutzte Algorithmus entweder bis zu 140GFLOPS an tatsächlicher Rechenleistung abrufen oder eine maximale Recheneffizienz von synthetisch 30% bzw. real 24,5% erzielen. Letzteres stellt eine Verdopplung des Stands der Technik dar. Eine anknüpfende Diskussion erläutert eingehend die Resultate.The steadily widening performance gap between processor- and memory-architectures - commonly known as the Memory Wall - requires novel concepts to achieve further scaling in processing performance. As memories were identified as the limitation within a Von-Neumann-architecture, this work addresses this constraining issue. Although three-dimensional memories alleviate the effects of the Memory Wall, the sole utilization of such memories would be insufficient. Due to higher efficiencies, the integration of processing capacity into memories (so-called Processing-In-Memory, PIM) depicts a promising alternative. However, a lack of PIM simulation models still remains. As a consequence, a flexible simulation tool for three-dimensional stacked memories was established, which was extended for modeling three-dimensional PIM architectures. This tool can simulate stacked memories such as Hybrid Memory Cube standard-compliant and simultaneously offers high accuracy by modeling on elementary data packets (FLIT) in combination with the hardware validated BOBSim simulator. To this, a specifically designed simulation clock tree enables an rapid simulation execution. A 100x speed up in simulation execution can be measured while utilizing the functional mode, whereas a 2x speed up is achieved during clock-cycle accuracy mode. With the aid of a specifically implemented, binary compatible GPU accelerator and the established tool, the modeling of a holistic three-dimensional PIM architecture is demonstrated within this work. Hardware resources used were constrained by a PIM architecture from literature. A representative, memory-bound, geophysical imaging algorithm was leveraged to evaluate the GPU model as well as the compound PIM simulation model. The sole GPU simulation model depicts a significantly improved simulation performance with a deviation of 6% compared to a Verilator model. Subsequently, various PIM accelerator configurations with the integrated GPU model were evaluated. Depending on the chosen PIM configuration, the utilized algorithm achieves 140GFLOPS of processing performance or a maximum computing efficiency of synthetically 30% or realistically 24.5%. The latter depicts a 2x improvement compared to state-of-the-art. A following discussion showcases the results in depth

Investigating, Optimizing, and Emulating Candidate Architectures for On-Board Space Processing

With increasing computational demands in the defense and commercial industries, future space missions will require new, high-performance architectures. Extensive research, benchmarking, and analysis of candidate architectures is required before performing the expensive, time-consuming process of radiation-hardening on suitable devices. In this work, we first compare two such candidate architectures: the Texas Instruments KeyStone II octa-core DSP and the ARM Cortex-A53 quad-core CPU. We evaluate the performance of a key kernel used in space applications, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and a key space application, the complex ambiguity function (CAF), on each architecture. We also develop and evaluate a direct-memory access scheme to take advantage of the KeyStone II architecture to perform FFTs. The KeyStone II’s batched 1D-FFT performance-per-watt is 4.1 times greater than the ARM Cortex-A53 and the CAF performance-per-watt is 1.8 times greater. Next, we develop and employ an emulator to study the performance of the High-Performance Spaceflight Computing (HPSC) processor. The HPSC processor is a future architecture under development by Boeing and funded by NASA and AFRL for their future space missions. HPSC is comprised of “chiplets” which have two quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 CPUs connected by an AMBA bus. These chiplets can be connected by different serial interfaces depending on mission needs. By employing two ARM platforms, an octa-core ARM architecture and two quad-core ARM architectures connected by Ethernet, we project HPSC performance for FFTs and another key space application: synthetic-aperture radar (SAR). We project that SAR will scale well on a multi-chiplet platform with a performance gain of 2.94 over a single US+ board when using two connected chiplets. Our research provides new insights on the tradeoffs encountered when parallelizing functions on these candidate architectures, including novel optimization techniques for each architectures