Cancer diagnosis using deep learning: A bibliographic review

In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements

A New Approach using Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning in HealthCare: Skin Cancer Classification

Nowadays, skin cancer is one of the most important problems faced by the world, due especially to the rapid development of skin cells and excessive exposure to UV rays. Therefore, early detection at an early stage employing advanced automated systems based on AI algorithms plays a major job in order to effectively identifying and detecting the disease, reducing patient health and financial burdens, and stopping its spread in the skin. In this context, several early skin cancer detection approaches and models have been presented throughout the last few decades to improve the rate of skin cancer detection using dermoscopic images. This work proposed a model that can help dermatologists to know and detect skin cancer in just a few seconds. This model combined the merits of two major artificial intelligence algorithms: Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning following the great success we achieved in the classification and recognition of images and especially in the medical sector. This research included four main steps. Firstly, the pre-processing techniques were applied to improve the accuracy, quality, and consistency of a dataset. The input dermoscopic images were obtained from the HAM10000 database. Then, the watershed algorithm was used for the segmentation process performed to extract the affected area. After that, the deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was utilized to classify the skin cancer into seven types: actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, benign keratosis, dermatofibroma melanocytic nevi, melanoma vascular skin lesions. Finally, in regards to the reinforcement learning part, the Deep Q_Learning algorithm was utilized to train and retrain our model until we found the best result. The accuracy metric was utilized to evaluate the efficacy and performance of the proposed method, which achieved a high accuracy of 80%. Furthermore, the experimental results demonstrate how reinforcement learning can be effectively combined with deep learning for skin cancer classification tasks

Application of Machine Learning in Melanoma Detection and the Identification of 'Ugly Duckling' and Suspicious Naevi: A Review

Skin lesions known as naevi exhibit diverse characteristics such as size, shape, and colouration. The concept of an "Ugly Duckling Naevus" comes into play when monitoring for melanoma, referring to a lesion with distinctive features that sets it apart from other lesions in the vicinity. As lesions within the same individual typically share similarities and follow a predictable pattern, an ugly duckling naevus stands out as unusual and may indicate the presence of a cancerous melanoma. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has become a significant player in the research and development field, as it combines machine learning techniques with a variety of patient analysis methods. Its aim is to increase accuracy and simplify decision-making, all while responding to the shortage of specialized professionals. These automated systems are especially important in skin cancer diagnosis where specialist availability is limited. As a result, their use could lead to life-saving benefits and cost reductions within healthcare. Given the drastic change in survival when comparing early stage to late-stage melanoma, early detection is vital for effective treatment and patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have gained popularity in skin cancer classification, effectively addressing challenges, and providing results equivalent to that of specialists. This article extensively covers modern Machine Learning and Deep Learning algorithms for detecting melanoma and suspicious naevi. It begins with general information on skin cancer and different types of naevi, then introduces AI, ML, DL, and CAD. The article then discusses the successful applications of various ML techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNN) for melanoma detection compared to dermatologists' performance. Lastly, it examines ML methods for UD naevus detection and identifying suspicious naevi

Towards an Effective Imaging-Based Decision Support System for Skin Cancer

The usage of expert systems to aid in medical decisions has been employed since 1980s in distinct ap plications. With the high demands of medical care and limited human resources, these technologies are required more than ever. Skin cancer has been one of the pathologies with higher growth, which suf fers from lack of dermatology experts in most of the affected geographical areas. A permanent record of examination that can be further analyzed are medical imaging modalities. Most of these modalities were also assessed along with machine learning classification methods. It is the aim of this research to provide background information about skin cancer types, medical imaging modalities, data mining and machine learning methods, and their application on skin cancer imaging, as well as the disclosure of a proposal of a multi-imaging modality decision support system for skin cancer diagnosis and treatment assessment based in the most recent available technology. This is expected to be a reference for further implementation of imaging-based clinical support systems.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

The role of AI classifiers in skin cancer images

Background: The use of different imaging modalities to assist in skin cancer diagnosis is a common practice in clinical scenarios. Different features representative of the lesion under evaluation can be retrieved from image analysis and processing. However, the integration and understanding of these additional parameters can be a challenging task for physicians, so artificial intelligence (AI) methods can be implemented to assist in this process. This bibliographic research was performed with the goal of assessing the current applications of AI algorithms as an assistive tool in skin cancer diagnosis, based on information retrieved from different imaging modalities. Materials and methods: The bibliography databases ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were used for the literature search, with the combination of keywords: skin cancer, skin neoplasm, imaging and classification methods. Results: The search resulted in 526 publications, which underwent a screening process, considering the established eligibility criteria. After screening, only 65 were qualified for revision. Conclusion: Different imaging modalities have already been coupled with AI methods, particularly dermoscopy for melanoma recognition. Learners based on support vector machines seem to be the preferred option. Future work should focus on image analysis, processing stages and image fusion assuring the best possible classification outcome.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

A survey, review, and future trends of skin lesion segmentation and classification

The Computer-aided Diagnosis or Detection (CAD) approach for skin lesion analysis is an emerging field of research that has the potential to alleviate the burden and cost of skin cancer screening. Researchers have recently indicated increasing interest in developing such CAD systems, with the intention of providing a user-friendly tool to dermatologists to reduce the challenges encountered or associated with manual inspection. This article aims to provide a comprehensive literature survey and review of a total of 594 publications (356 for skin lesion segmentation and 238 for skin lesion classification) published between 2011 and 2022. These articles are analyzed and summarized in a number of different ways to contribute vital information regarding the methods for the development of CAD systems. These ways include: relevant and essential definitions and theories, input data (dataset utilization, preprocessing, augmentations, and fixing imbalance problems), method configuration (techniques, architectures, module frameworks, and losses), training tactics (hyperparameter settings), and evaluation criteria. We intend to investigate a variety of performance-enhancing approaches, including ensemble and post-processing. We also discuss these dimensions to reveal their current trends based on utilization frequencies. In addition, we highlight the primary difficulties associated with evaluating skin lesion segmentation and classification systems using minimal datasets, as well as the potential solutions to these difficulties. Findings, recommendations, and trends are disclosed to inform future research on developing an automated and robust CAD system for skin lesion analysis

Skin Lesion Analyser: An Efficient Seven-Way Multi-Class Skin Cancer Classification Using MobileNet

Skin cancer, a major form of cancer, is a critical public health problem with 123,000 newly diagnosed melanoma cases and between 2 and 3 million non-melanoma cases worldwide each year. The leading cause of skin cancer is high exposure of skin cells to UV radiation, which can damage the DNA inside skin cells leading to uncontrolled growth of skin cells. Skin cancer is primarily diagnosed visually employing clinical screening, a biopsy, dermoscopic analysis, and histopathological examination. It has been demonstrated that the dermoscopic analysis in the hands of inexperienced dermatologists may cause a reduction in diagnostic accuracy. Early detection and screening of skin cancer have the potential to reduce mortality and morbidity. Previous studies have shown Deep Learning ability to perform better than human experts in several visual recognition tasks. In this paper, we propose an efficient seven-way automated multi-class skin cancer classification system having performance comparable with expert dermatologists. We used a pretrained MobileNet model to train over HAM10000 dataset using transfer learning. The model classifies skin lesion image with a categorical accuracy of 83.1 percent, top2 accuracy of 91.36 percent and top3 accuracy of 95.34 percent. The weighted average of precision, recall, and f1-score were found to be 0.89, 0.83, and 0.83 respectively. The model has been deployed as a web application for public use at (https://saketchaturvedi.github.io). This fast, expansible method holds the potential for substantial clinical impact, including broadening the scope of primary care practice and augmenting clinical decision-making for dermatology specialists.Comment: This is a pre-copyedited version of a contribution published in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Hassanien A., Bhatnagar R., Darwish A. (eds) published by Chaturvedi S.S., Gupta K., Prasad P.S. The definitive authentication version is available online via https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3383-9_1