Improved algorithms for two single machine scheduling problems

AbstractIn this paper, we investigate two single machine scheduling problems. The first problem addresses a class of the two-stage scheduling problems in which the first stage is job production and the second stage is job delivery. For the case that jobs are processed on a single machine and delivered by a single vehicle to one customer area, with the objective of minimizing the time when all jobs are completed and delivered to the customer area and the vehicle returns to the machine, an approximation algorithm with a worst-case ratio of 53 is known and no approximation can have a worst-case of 32 unless P=NP. We present an improved approximation algorithm with a worst-case ratio of 5335, which only leaves a gap of 170. The second problem is a single machine scheduling problem subject to a period of maintenance. The objective is to minimize the total completion time. The best known approximation algorithm has a worst-case ratio of 2017. We present a polynomial time approximation scheme

Single-machine scheduling with stepwise tardiness costs and release times

We study a scheduling problem that belongs to the yard operations component of the railroad planning problems, namely the hump sequencing problem. The scheduling problem is characterized as a single-machine problem with stepwise tardiness cost objectives. This is a new scheduling criterion which is also relevant in the context of traditional machine scheduling problems. We produce complexity results that characterize some cases of the problem as pseudo-polynomially solvable. For the difficult-to-solve cases of the problem, we develop mathematical programming formulations, and propose heuristic algorithms. We test the formulations and heuristic algorithms on randomly generated single-machine scheduling problems and real-life datasets for the hump sequencing problem. Our experiments show promising results for both sets of problems

An Approximately Optimal Algorithm for Scheduling Phasor Data Transmissions in Smart Grid Networks

In this paper, we devise a scheduling algorithm for ordering transmission of synchrophasor data from the substation to the control center in as short a time frame as possible, within the realtime hierarchical communications infrastructure in the electric grid. The problem is cast in the framework of the classic job scheduling with precedence constraints. The optimization setup comprises the number of phasor measurement units (PMUs) to be installed on the grid, a weight associated with each PMU, processing time at the control center for the PMUs, and precedence constraints between the PMUs. The solution to the PMU placement problem yields the optimum number of PMUs to be installed on the grid, while the processing times are picked uniformly at random from a predefined set. The weight associated with each PMU and the precedence constraints are both assumed known. The scheduling problem is provably NP-hard, so we resort to approximation algorithms which provide solutions that are suboptimal yet possessing polynomial time complexity. A lower bound on the optimal schedule is derived using branch and bound techniques, and its performance evaluated using standard IEEE test bus systems. The scheduling policy is power grid-centric, since it takes into account the electrical properties of the network under consideration.Comment: 8 pages, published in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, October 201

Asymptotically Optimal Approximation Algorithms for Coflow Scheduling

Many modern datacenter applications involve large-scale computations composed of multiple data flows that need to be completed over a shared set of distributed resources. Such a computation completes when all of its flows complete. A useful abstraction for modeling such scenarios is a {\em coflow}, which is a collection of flows (e.g., tasks, packets, data transmissions) that all share the same performance goal. In this paper, we present the first approximation algorithms for scheduling coflows over general network topologies with the objective of minimizing total weighted completion time. We consider two different models for coflows based on the nature of individual flows: circuits, and packets. We design constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithms for scheduling packet-based coflows with or without given flow paths, and circuit-based coflows with given flow paths. Furthermore, we give an $O(\log n/\log \log n)$-approximation polynomial time algorithm for scheduling circuit-based coflows where flow paths are not given (here $n$ is the number of network edges). We obtain our results by developing a general framework for coflow schedules, based on interval-indexed linear programs, which may extend to other coflow models and objective functions and may also yield improved approximation bounds for specific network scenarios. We also present an experimental evaluation of our approach for circuit-based coflows that show a performance improvement of at least 22% on average over competing heuristics.Comment: Fixed minor typo

Order acceptance and scheduling in a single-machine environment: exact and heuristic algorithms.

In this paper, we develop exact and heuristic algorithms for the order acceptance and scheduling problem in a single-machine environment. We consider the case where a pool consisting of firm planned orders as well as potential orders is available from which an over-demanded company can select. The capacity available for processing the accepted orders is limited and orders are characterized by known processing times, delivery dates, revenues and the weight representing a penalty per unit-time delay beyond the delivery date promised to the customer. We prove the non-approximability of the problem and give two linear formulations that we solve with CPLEX. We devise two exact branch-and-bound procedures able to solve problem instances of practical dimensions. For the solution of large instances, we propose six heuristics. We provide a comparison and comments on the efficiency and quality of the results obtained using both the exact and heuristic algorithms, including the solution of the linear formulations using CPLEX.Order acceptance; Scheduling; Single machine; Branch-and-bound; Heuristics; Firm planned orders;