Tracing the Algorithm of Bilingual Language Learning

206 p.Aprender un nuevo idioma es una tarea ardua pero altamente gratificante. Los aprendices deben adquirir un vocabulario extensivo, así como una serie de reglas sobre cómo variar y combinar este vocabulario para producir oraciones con sentido. No obstante, es posible que aprender nuevos idiomas se vuelva más sencillo una vez conocemos al menos dos. Basado en esta idea, en esta tesis exploro si existen diferencias entre las personas que sólo saben un idioma (monolingües) y aquellas que hablan dos idiomas (bilingües) a la hora de aprender un nuevo idioma. Para ello, llevé a cabo seis experimentos conductuales con participantes de distintos perfiles lingüísticos: un grupo de hablantes monolingües del castellano, un grupo bilingüe castellano-inglés, y un grupo bilingüe castellano-vasco. Estos experimentos, en conjunto, abarcaban el aprendizaje implícito y explícito de nuevos idiomas utilizando estímulos lingüísticos artificiales. En general, los resultados de todos experimentos indicaron que ambos grupos bilingües desempeñaron mejor que el grupo monolingüe al aprender vocabulario de manera implícita y explícita, pero no en otros ámbitos (fonología, ortografía, morfología). Para explicar cómo surgen estas diferencias en el aprendizaje de vocabulario, desarrollé un modelo computacional capaz de aprender palabras escritas utilizando los patrones ortográficos de palabras en uno o dos idiomas. Este modelo indicó que, al aprender palabras en dos idiomas, es más sencillo reconocer y producir nuevas palabras que al aprender vocabulario de un único idioma. La totalidad de estos resultados me llevaron a concluir que los monolingües y bilingües difieren fundamentalmente en el aprendizaje de vocabulario, debido a que la exposición a distintos patrones dentro de palabras en dos idiomas les hace más flexibles a la hora de integrar la información ortográfica (y posiblemente fonológica) de nuevas palabras

A new approach to CALL content authoring

[no abstract

Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018 : 10-12 December 2018, Torino

On behalf of the Program Committee, a very warm welcome to the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-­‐it 2018). This edition of the conference is held in Torino. The conference is locally organised by the University of Torino and hosted into its prestigious main lecture hall “Cavallerizza Reale”. The CLiC-­‐it conference series is an initiative of the Italian Association for Computational Linguistics (AILC) which, after five years of activity, has clearly established itself as the premier national forum for research and development in the fields of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing, where leading researchers and practitioners from academia and industry meet to share their research results, experiences, and challenges

Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme

Computational Linguistics; Germanic Languages; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); Computing Methodologie

Translation, interpreting, cognition

Cognitive aspects of the translation process have become central in Translation and Interpreting Studies in recent years, further establishing the field of Cognitive Translatology. Empirical and interdisciplinary studies investigating translation and interpreting processes promise a hitherto unprecedented predictive and explanatory power. This collection contains such studies which observe behaviour during translation and interpreting. The contributions cover a vast area and investigate behaviour during translation and interpreting – with a focus on training of future professionals, on language processing more generally, on the role of technology in the practice of translation and interpreting, on translation of multimodal media texts, on aspects of ergonomics and usability, on emotions, self-concept and psychological factors, and finally also on revision and post-editing. For the present publication, we selected a number of contributions presented at the Second International Congress on Translation, Interpreting and Cognition hosted by the Tra&Co Lab at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz. Most of the papers in this volume are formulated in a particular constraint-based grammar framework, Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The contributions investigate how the lexical and constructional aspects of this theory can be combined to provide an answer to this question across different linguistic sub-theories

The way out of the box

Synopsis: Cognitive aspects of the translation process have become central in Translation and Interpreting Studies in recent years, further establishing the field of Cognitive Translatology. Empirical and interdisciplinary studies investigating translation and interpreting processes promise a hitherto unprecedented predictive and explanatory power. This collection contains such studies which observe behaviour during translation and interpreting. The contributions cover a vast area and investigate behaviour during translation and interpreting – with a focus on training of future professionals, on language processing more generally, on the role of technology in the practice of translation and interpreting, on translation of multimodal media texts, on aspects of ergonomics and usability, on emotions, self-concept and psychological factors, and finally also on revision and post-editing. For the present publication, we selected a number of contributions presented at the Second International Congress on Translation, Interpreting and Cognition hosted by the Tra&Co Lab at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018

On behalf of the Program Committee, a very warm welcome to the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-­‐it 2018). This edition of the conference is held in Torino. The conference is locally organised by the University of Torino and hosted into its prestigious main lecture hall “Cavallerizza Reale”. The CLiC-­‐it conference series is an initiative of the Italian Association for Computational Linguistics (AILC) which, after five years of activity, has clearly established itself as the premier national forum for research and development in the fields of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing, where leading researchers and practitioners from academia and industry meet to share their research results, experiences, and challenges

Investigating lexical priming using eye tracking data – some “glad news"

This paper explores Hoey’s (2005) lexical priming theory using eye tracking. As this is a broad theory only a few of the overlapping claims made in the theory are explored. The focus of this study was how synonyms behave with regards to their colligations - the grammatical patterns in which they occur. Hoey claims that they will differ - this was the primary claim under investigation. The methodology used in this project is eye tracking. This is a psycholinguistic technique which allows researchers to make informed suggestions as to what participants find unexpected or confusing when reading texts, based on the movements of their gaze. By applying this scientific technique to a theory born of corpus data, this project was able to lend empirical evidence in favour of Hoey’s claims. The findings of the study, overall, support Hoey’s theory - synonyms in pairs with unexpected colligations took longer to process than synonyms in pairs with expected colligations. This increase in time indicates difficulty processing, indicating that synonyms do differ in terms of their colligations and participants are, at at least a subconscious level, aware of this. The results of this study did differ between local and global measures, however. This difference indicates that the effect of expectedness on reading of these colligatory pairs impacts more significantly on initial recognition and access of colligatory pairs, rather than on integration of the pair into the processing of a sentence. The results of this study not only support an element of Hoey’s lexical theory but also usage based theories of language in general. They highlight the importance of frequency of exposure to language in context and demonstrate how this affects language processing and organisation in the mental lexicon