Hybrid-Vehfog: A Robust Approach for Reliable Dissemination of Critical Messages in Connected Vehicles

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANET) enable efficient communication between vehicles with the aim of improving road safety. However, the growing number of vehicles in dense regions and obstacle shadowing regions like Manhattan and other downtown areas leads to frequent disconnection problems resulting in disrupted radio wave propagation between vehicles. To address this issue and to transmit critical messages between vehicles and drones deployed from service vehicles to overcome road incidents and obstacles, we proposed a hybrid technique based on fog computing called Hybrid-Vehfog to disseminate messages in obstacle shadowing regions, and multi-hop technique to disseminate messages in non-obstacle shadowing regions. Our proposed algorithm dynamically adapts to changes in an environment and benefits in efficiency with robust drone deployment capability as needed. Performance of Hybrid-Vehfog is carried out in Network Simulator (NS-2) and Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) simulators. The results showed that Hybrid-Vehfog outperformed Cloud-assisted Message Downlink Dissemination Scheme (CMDS), Cross-Layer Broadcast Protocol (CLBP), PEer-to-Peer protocol for Allocated REsource (PrEPARE), Fog-Named Data Networking (NDN) with mobility, and flooding schemes at all vehicle densities and simulation times

Beaconing Approaches in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey

A Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) is a type of wireless ad hoc network that facilitates ubiquitous connectivity between vehicles in the absence of fixed infrastructure. Beaconing approaches is an important research challenge in high mobility vehicular networks with enabling safety applications. In this article, we perform a survey and a comparative study of state-of-the-art adaptive beaconing approaches in VANET, that explores the main advantages and drawbacks behind their design. The survey part of the paper presents a review of existing adaptive beaconing approaches such as adaptive beacon transmission power, beacon rate adaptation, contention window size adjustment and Hybrid adaptation beaconing techniques. The comparative study of the paper compares the representatives of adaptive beaconing approaches in terms of their objective of study, summary of their study, the utilized simulator and the type of vehicular scenario. Finally, we discussed the open issues and research directions related to VANET adaptive beaconing approaches.Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J.; Abu Bakar, K.; Sadiq, AS.; Ben Mussa, SA. (2013). Beaconing Approaches in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey. Wireless Personal Communications. 73(3):885-912. doi:10.1007/s11277-013-1222-9S885912733ITS-Standards (1996) Intelligent transportation systems, U.S. Department of Transportation, http://www.standards.its.dot.gov/about.aspCheng, L., Henty, B., Stancil, D., Bai, F., & Mudalige, P. (2005). Mobile vehicle-to-vehicle narrow-band channel measurement and characterization of the 5.9 Ghz dedicated short range communication (DSRC) frequency band. IEEE Transactions on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(8), 1501–1516.van Eenennaam, E., Wolterink, K., Karagiannis, G., & Heijenk, G. (2009). Exploring the solution space of beaconing in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international vehicular networking conference, Tokyo (pp. 1–8).Torrent-Moreno, M. (2007). Inter-vehicle communications: Assessing information dissemination under safety constraints. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE conference wireless on demand network systems and services, Austria (pp. 59–64).Lloret, J., Canovas, A., Catalá, A., & Garcia, M. (2012). Group-based protocol and mobility model for vanets to offer internet access. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2224–2245 doi: 10.1016j.jnca.2012.02.009 .Nzouonta, J., Rajgure, N., Wang, G., & Borcea, C. (2009). Vanet routing on city roads using real-time vehicular traffic information. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(7), 3609–3626.Fukui, R., Koike, H., & Okada, H. (2002). Dynamic integrated transmission control(ditrac) over inter-vehicle communications. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE vehicular technology conference, Birmingham (pp. 483–487).Schmidt, R., Leinmuller, T., Schoch, E., Kargl, F., & Schafer, G. (2010). Exploration of adaptive beaconing for efficient intervehicle safety communication. IEEE Network, 24(1), 14–19.Ghafoor, K., Bakar, K., van Eenennaam, E., Khokhar, R., Gonzalez, A. A fuzzy logic approach to beaconing for vehicular ad hoc networks, Accepted for publication in Telecommunication Systems Journal.Ghafoor, K., & Bakar, K. (2010). A novel delay and reliability aware inter vehicle routing protocol. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 2(2), 66–88.Mittag, J., Thomas, F., Härri, J., & Hartenstein, H. (2009). A comparison of single-and multi-hop beaconing in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM international workshop on vehicular internetworking, Beijing (pp. 69–78).Sommer, C., Tonguz, O., & Dressler, F. (2010). Adaptive beaconing for delay-sensitive and congestion-aware traffic information systems. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international vehicular networking conference (VNC), New Jersey (pp. 1–8).Guan, X., Sengupta, R., Krishnan, H., & Bai, F. (2007). A feedback-based power control algorithm design for vanet. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on mobile networking for vehicular environments, USA (pp. 67–72).AL-Hashimi, H., Bakar, K., & Ghafoor, K. (2011). Inter-domain proxy mobile ipv6 based vehicular network. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 2(4), 1–15.Rawat, D., Popescu, D., Yan, G., & Olariu, S. (2011). Enhancing vanet performance by joint adaptation of transmission power and contention window size. Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22(9), 1528–1535.European-ITS (2009) Eits-technical report 102 638 v1.1.1, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/homepage.aspxNHTSA, I. Joint program office”, report to congress on the national highway traffic safety administration its program, program progress during 1992–1996 and strategic plan for 1997–2002, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Godbole, D., Sengupta, R., Misener, J., Kourjanskaia, N., & Michael, J. (1998). Benefit evaluation of crash avoidance systems. Transportation Research, 1621(1), 1–9.Reinders, R., van Eenennaam, M., Karagiannis, G., & Heijenk, G. (2004). Contention window analysis for beaconing in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on wireless communications and mobile computing (IWCMC), Istanbul (pp. 1481–1487).Yang, L., Guo, J., & Wu, Y. (2008). Channel adaptive one hop broadcasting for vanets. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Beijing (pp. 369–374).Tseng, Y., Ni, S., Chen, Y., & Sheu, J. (2002). The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network. Wireless Networks, 8(2), 153–167.van Eenennaam, E. M., Karagiannis, G., & Heijenk, G. (2010). Towards scalable beaconing in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2010 ERCIM workshop on eMobility, Lulea (pp. 103–108).Ros, F., Ruiz, P., & Stojmenovic, I. (2012). Acknowledgment-based broadcast protocol for reliable and efficient data dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(1), 33–46.Torrent-Moreno, M., Santi, P., & Hartenstein, H. (2006). Distributed fair transmit power adjustment for vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on sensor and ad hoc communications and networks, Reston, VA (pp. 479–488).Artimy, M. (2007). Local density estimation and dynamic transmission-range assignment in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(3), 400–412.Caizzone, G., Giacomazzi, P., Musumeci, L., & Verticale, G. (2005). A power control algorithm with high channel availability for vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on communications, Seoul (pp. 3171–3176).Torrent-Moreno, M., Santi, P., & Hartenstein, H. (2009). Vehicle-to-vehicle communication: Fair transmit power control for safety critical information. IEEE Transaction for Vehicular Technology, 58(7), 3684–3703.Torrent-Moreno, M., Schmidt-Eisenlohr, F., Fubler, H., & Hartenstein, H. (2006). Effects of a realistic channel model on packet forwarding in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE conference on wireless communications and networking, USA (pp. 385–391).NS, Network simulator (June 2011). http://nsnam.isi.edu/nsnam/index.php/MainPageNakagami, M. (1960). The m-distribution: A general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fadinge. In W. C. Hoffman (Ed.), Statistical method of radio propagation. New York: Pergamon Press.Narayanaswamy, S., Kawadia, V., Sreenivas, R., & Kumar, P. (2002). Power control in ad-hoc networks: Theory, architecture, algorithm and implementation of the compow protocol. In Proceedings of the 2002 European wireless conference next generation wireless networks: technologies, protocols, Italy (pp. 1–6).Cheng, P., Lee, K., Gerla, M., & Harri, J. (2010). Geodtn+ nav: Geographic dtn routing with navigator prediction for urban vehicular environments. Mobile Networks and Applications, 15(1), 61–82.Gomez, J., & Campbell, A. (2004). A case for variable-range transmission power control in wireless multihop networks. In Proceedings twenty-third annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, Hong kong (pp. 1425–1436).Ramanathan, R., & Rosales-Hain, R. (2000). Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In Proceedings nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, Hong kong (pp. 404–413).Artimy, M., Robertson, W., & Phillips, W. (2005). Assignment of dynamic transmission range based on estimation of vehicle density. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, Germany (pp. 40–48).Samara, G., Ramadas, S., & Al-Salihy, W. (2010). Safety message power transmission control for vehicular ad hoc networks. Computer Science, 6(10), 1027–1032.Rezaei, S., Sengupta, R., Krishnan, H., Guan, X., & Student, P. (2008). Adaptive communication scheme for cooperative active safety system.Rezaei, S., Sengupta, R., Krishnan, H., & Guan, X. (2007). Reducing the communication required by dsrc-based vehicle safety systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Bellevue, WA (pp. 361–366).Sommer, C., Tonguz, O., & Dressler, F. (2011). Traffic information systems: Efficient message dissemination via adaptive beaconing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(5), 173–179.Thaina, C., Nakorn, K., & Rojviboonchai, K. (2011). A study of adaptive beacon transmission on vehicular ad-hoc networks. In Proceeding of the 2011 IEEE 13th international conference on communication technology (ICCT), Vancouver (pp. 597–602).Boukerche, A., Rezende, C., & Pazzi, R. (2009). Improving neighbor localization in vehicular ad hoc networks to avoid overhead from periodic messages. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE global telecommunications conference, USA (pp. 1–6).Bai, F., Sadagopan, N., & Helmy, A. (2008). Important: A framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2003 22th annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications, USA (pp. 825–835).Nguyen, H., Bhawiyuga, A., & Jeong, H. (2012). A comprehensive analysis of beacon dissemination in vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 75th IEEE vehicular technology conference, Korea (pp. 1–5).Djahel, S., & Ghamri-Doudane, Y. (2012). A robust congestion control scheme for fast and reliable dissemination of safety messages in vanets. In Proceeding of the 2012 IEEE conference wireless communications and networking, Paris, France (pp. 2264–2269).O. Technologies (Augast 2012) Opnet modeler, http://www.opnet.com/Huang, C., Fallah, Y., Sengupta, R., & Krishnan, H. (2010). Adaptive intervehicle communication control for cooperative safety systems. IEEE Network, 24(1), 6–13.OPNET (June 2012) Opnet modeler, http://www.opnet.com/Kerner, B. (2004). The physics of traffic: Empirical freeway pattern features, engineering applications, and theory. Berlin: Springer.Vinel, A., Vishnevsky, V., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2008). A simple analytical model for the periodic broadcasting in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE international GLOBECOM workshops, Philadelphia, PA (pp. 1–5).Mariyasagayam, N., Menouar, H., & Lenardi, M. (2009). An adaptive forwarding mechanism for data dissemination in vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference, Boston (pp. 1–5).Hung, C., Chan, H., & Wu, E. (2008). Mobility pattern aware routing for heterogeneous vehicular networks. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on wireless communications and networking, Las Vegas (pp. 2200–2205).Yang, K., Ou, S., Chen, H., & He, J. (2007). A multihop peer-communication protocol with fairness guarantee for ieee 802.16-based vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 56(6), 3358–3370.Lequerica, I., Ruiz, P., & Cabrera, V. (2010). Improvement of vehicular communications by using 3G capabilities to disseminate control information. IEEE Network Magazine, 24(1), 32–38.Oh, D., Kim, P., Song, J., Jeon, S., & Lee, H. (2005). Design considerations of satellite-based vehicular broadband networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, 12(5), 91–97.Ko, Y., Sim, M., & Nekovee, M. (2006). Wi-fi based broadband wireless access for users on the road. BT Technology Journal, 24(2), 123–129.Choffnes, D., & Bustamante, F. (2005). An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, Cologne (pp. 69–78).TIGER (October 2010) Topologically integrated geographic encoding and referencing system, http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/Mittag, J., Thomas, F., Harri, J., & Hartenstein, H. (2009). A comparison of single and multi-hop beaconing in vanets. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM international workshop on vehiculaar internetworking, Beijing (pp. 69–78).Rappaport, T. (1996). Wireless communications: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR

MAC-aware Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey

International audienceThe constantly growing number of vehicles on our roads has become an increasing major cause of serious injury and death. Efficient data dissemination in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) inevitably requires an efficient and robust routing protocol. In this context, several categories of routing protocols have been proposed in the literature to meet VANETs application requirements in terms of delay, packet loss and throughput. In this paper, we focus on cross layer routing protocols. We present a survey of state-of-the-art MAC aware routing protocols designed for VANETs. These solutions can broadly be divided into two categories: contention-free and contention-based MAC-aware routing. In this paper we carryout a comprehensive comparison of these approaches. Finally, we identify open research issues that should be addressed in order to improve MAC aware routing techniques in VANETs

A Simple and Robust Dissemination Protocol for VANETs

Several promising applications for Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) exist. For most of these applications, the communication among vehicles is envisioned to be based on the broadcasting of messages. This is due to the inherent highly mobile environment and importance of these messages to vehicles nearby. To deal with broadcast communication, dissemination protocols must be defined in such a way as to (i) prevent the so-called broadcast storm problem in dense networks and (ii) deal with disconnected networks in sparse topologies. In this paper, we present a Simple and Robust Dissemination (SRD) protocol that deals with these requirements in both sparse and dense networks. Its novelty lies in its simplicity and robustness. Simplicity is achieved by considering only two states (cluster tail and non- tail) for a vehicle. Robustness is achieved by assigning message delivery responsibility to multiple vehicles in sparse networks. Our simulation results show that SRD achieves high delivery ratio and low end-to-end delay under diverse traffic conditions

Routing And Communication Path Mapping In VANETS

Vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET) has quickly become an important aspect of the intelligent transport system (ITS), which is a combination of information technology, and transport works to improve efficiency and safety through data gathering and dissemination. However, transmitting data over an ad-hoc network comes with several issues such as broadcast storms, hidden terminal problems and unreliability; these greatly reduce the efficiency of the network and hence the purpose for which it was developed. We therefore propose a system of utilising information gathered externally from the node or through the various layers of the network into the access layer of the ETSI communication stack for routing to improve the overall efficiency of data delivery, reduce hidden terminals and increase reliability. We divide route into segments and design a set of metric system to select a controlling node as well as procedure for data transfer. Furthermore we propose a system for faster data delivery based on priority of data and density of nodes from route information while developing a map to show the communication situation of an area. These metrics and algorithms will be simulated in further research using the NS-3 environment to demonstrate the effectiveness