Competitive-Ratio Approximation Schemes for Minimizing the Makespan in the Online-List Model

We consider online scheduling on multiple machines for jobs arriving one-by-one with the objective of minimizing the makespan. For any number of identical parallel or uniformly related machines, we provide a competitive-ratio approximation scheme that computes an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is arbitrarily close to the best possible competitive ratio. We also determine this value up to any desired accuracy. This is the first application of competitive-ratio approximation schemes in the online-list model. The result proves the applicability of the concept in different online models. We expect that it fosters further research on other online problems

Resource augmentation in load balancing

We consider load-balancing in the following setting. The on-line algorithm is allowed to use $n$ machines, whereas the optimal off-line algorithm is limited to $m$ machines, for some fixed $m < n$. We show that while the greedy algorithm has a competitive ratio which decays linearly in the inverse of $n/m$, the best on-line algorithm has a ratio which decays exponentially in $n/m$. Specifically, we give an algorithm with competitive ratio of 1+2^{- frac{n{m (1- o (1)), and a lower bound of 1+ e^{ - frac{n{m (1+ o(1)) on the competitive ratio of any randomized algorithm. We also consider the preemptive case. We show an on-line algorithm with a competitive ratio of 1+ e^{ - frac{n{m (1+ o(1)). We show that the algorithm is optimal by proving a matching lower bound. We also consider the non-preemptive model with temporary tasks. We prove that for $n=m+1$, the greedy algorithm is optimal. (It is not optimal for permanent tasks.

Order Acceptance and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Review

Over the past 20 years, the topic of order acceptance has attracted considerable attention from those who study scheduling and those who practice it. In a firm that strives to align its functions so that profit is maximized, the coordination of capacity with demand may require that business sometimes be turned away. In particular, there is a trade-off between the revenue brought in by a particular order, and all of its associated costs of processing. The present study focuses on the body of research that approaches this trade-off by considering two decisions: which orders to accept for processing, and how to schedule them. This paper presents a taxonomy and a review of this literature, catalogs its contributions and suggests opportunities for future research in this area

"Rotterdam econometrics": publications of the econometric institute 1956-2005

This paper contains a list of all publications over the period 1956-2005, as reported in the Rotterdam Econometric Institute Reprint series during 1957-2005.

"Rotterdam econometrics": publications of the econometric institute 1956-2005

This paper contains a list of all publications over the period 1956-2005, as reported in the Rotterdam Econometric Institute Reprint series during 1957-2005

Extending scheduling algorithms to minimise the impact of bounded uncertainty using interval programming

&nbsp;This research proposed a new methodology to extend algorithms to accept interval-based uncertain parameters. The methodology is applied on scheduling algorithms, including heuristic and meta-heuristic algorithms and produced optimal results with higher accuracy. The research outcomes are effective for decision making process using uncertain or predicted data

An optimal algorithm for preemptive on-line scheduling

We investigate the problem of on-line scheduling jobs on m identical parallel machines where preemption is allowed. The goal is to minimize the makespan. We derive an approximation algorithm with worst-case guarantee m(m)/(m(m) - (m - 1)(m)) for every m greater than or equal to 2, which increasingly tends to e/(e - 1) approximate to 1.58 as m --> infinity. Moreover, we prove that for no m greater than or equal to 2 there does exist any approximation algorithm with a better worst-case guarantee