On deletions in open addressing hashing

Deletions in open addressing tables have often been seen as problematic. The usual solution is to use a special mark’deleted’ so that probe sequences continue past deleted slots, as if there was an element still sitting there. Such a solution, notwithstanding is wide applicability, may involve performance degradation. In the first part of this paper we review a practical implementation of the often overlooked deletion algorithm for linear probing hash tables, analyze its properties and performance, and provide several strong arguments in favor of the Robin Hood variant. In particular, we show how a small variation can yield substantial improvements for unsuccessful search. In the second part we propose an algorithm for true deletion in open addressing hashing with secondary clustering, like quadratic hashing. As far as we know, this is the first time that such an algorithm appears in the literature. Moreover, for tables built using the Robin Hood variant the deletion algorithm strongly preserves randomness (the resulting table is identical to the table that would result if the item were not inserted at all). Although it involves some extra memory for bookkeeping, the algorithm is comparatively easy and efficient, and it might be of some practical value, besides its theoretical interest.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

On deletions in open addressing hashing

Deletions in open addressing tables have often been seen as problematic. The usual solution is to use a special mark ’deleted’ so that probe sequences continue past deleted slots, as if there was an element still sitting there. Such a solution, notwithstanding is wide applicability, may involve serious performance degradation. In the first part of this paper we review a practical implementation of the often overlooked deletion algorithm for linear probing hash tables, analyze its properties and performance, and provide several strong arguments in favor of the Robin Hood variant. In particular, we show how a small variation can yield substantial improvements for unsuccesful search. In the second part we propose an algorithm for true deletion in open addressing hashing with secondary clustering, like quadratic hashing. As far as we know, this is the first time that such an algorithm appears in the literature. Although it involves some extra memory for bookkeeping, the algorithm is comparatively easy and efficient, and might be of practical value, besides its theoretical interest.Postprint (published version

Comparison of scatter storage techniques using an analysis of variance model

An analysis of variance model is developed to determine if a significant difference exists between various scatter storage techniques. The model is a two-factor hierarchical mixed design with each combination of transformation and search method considered as a treatment. The data used in the analysis is obtained from a computer program which provides statistics on the number of probes needed to load the (k+l)st item into a table for the different treatments. An ANOVA table was then computed for various load factors. A significant difference among the treatments was detected for load factors above .4. Comparison of individual treatments using Tukey\u27s multiple range test shows that although some treatments are significantly inferior, most treatments are not significantly different in terms of the average number of probes needed to load an item --Abstract, page ii