Signal processing for distributed nodes in smart networks

With increasing environmental concern for energy conservation and mitigating climate change, next generation smart networks are bound to provide improved performance in terms of security, reliability, and energy efficiency. For instance, future smart networks will work in highly complex and dynamic environments and will have distributed nodes that need to interact with each other and may also interact with an energy provider in order to improve their performance. In this context, advanced signal processing tools such as game theory and distributed transmit beamforming can yield tremendous performance gains in terms of energy efficiency for demand management and signal trans-mission in smart networks. The central theme of this dissertation is the modeling of energy usage behavior of self-seeking distributed nodes in smart networks. The thesis mainly looks into two key areas of smart networks: 1) smart grid networks and 2) wireless sensor networks, and contains: an analytical framework of the economics of electric vehicle charging in smart grids in an energy constrained environment; a study of a consumer-centric energy management scheme for encouraging the consumers in a smart grid to voluntarily take part in energy management; an outage management scheme for efficiently curtailing energy from the consumers in smart grids in the event of a power outage; a comprehensive study of power control of sensors in a wireless sensor network using game theory and distributed transmit beamforming; and finally, an energy aware distributed transmit beamfoming technique for long distance signal transmission in a wireless sensor network. This thesis addresses the challenges of modeling the energy usage behavior of distributed nodes through studying the propriety of energy users in smart networks, 1) by capturing the interactions between the energy users and energy provider in smart grids using non-cooperative Stackelberg and generalized Nash games, and showing that the socially optimal energy management for users can be achieved at the solution of the games, and 2) by studying the power control of sensors in wireless sensor networks, using a non-cooperative Nash game and distributed transmit beamforming that demonstrates significant transmit energy savings for the sensors. To foster energy efficient transmission, the thesis also studies a distributed transmit beamforming technique that does not require any channel state information for long distance signal transmission in sensor networks. The contributions of this dissertation are enhanced by proposing suitable system models and appropriate signal processing techniques. These models and techniques can capture the different cost-benefit tradeoffs that exist in these networks. All the proposed schemes in this dissertation are shown to have significant performance improvement when compared with existing solutions. The work in this thesis demonstrates that modeling power usage behavior of distributed nodes in smart networks is both possible and beneficial for increasing the energy efficiency of these networks

An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol Using Dynamic Queue Management for Delay-Tolerant Mobile Sensor Networks

Conventional MAC protocols for wireless sensor network perform poorly when faced with a delay-tolerant mobile network environment. Characterized by a highly dynamic and sparse topology, poor network connectivity as well as data delay-tolerance, delay-tolerant mobile sensor networks exacerbate the severe power constraints and memory limitations of nodes. This paper proposes an energy-efficient MAC protocol using dynamic queue management (EQ-MAC) for power saving and data queue management. Via data transfers initiated by the target sink and the use of a dynamic queue management strategy based on priority, EQ-MAC effectively avoids untargeted transfers, increases the chance of successful data transmission, and makes useful data reach the target terminal in a timely manner. Experimental results show that EQ-MAC has high energy efficiency in comparison with a conventional MAC protocol. It also achieves a 46% decrease in packet drop probability, 79% increase in system throughput, and 25% decrease in mean packet delay

Wireless Sensor Networks: Applications

Wireless sensor networks consist of small nodes with identifying component by sensing, computation, and wireless communications infrastructure capabilities. Many path searching means routing, power management, and data dissemination protocols have been specifically designed for WSNs where energy awareness is an essential design issue. Routing protocols in WSNs might differ depending on the application and network architecture. Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) provide several types of applications providing comfortable and smart-economic life. A multidisciplinary research area such as wireless sensor networks, where close collaboration in some users, application domain experts, hardware designers, and software developers is needed to implement efficient systems. The easy molding, fault tolerance, high sensing fidelity, low price, and rapid deployment features of sensor networks create various new and thrilling application areas for remote sensing. In the future, this wide range of application areas will make sensor networks an essential part of our lives. However, understanding of sensor networks needs to satisfy the constraints presented by factors such as fault tolerance, scalability, cost, hardware, dynamic topology, environment, and power consumption

Link Quality Based Power Efficient Routing Protocol (LQ-PERP)

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in deploying infrastructure-less, self configurable, distributed networks such as Mobile AdHoc Networks (MANET) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) for applications like emergency management and physical variables monitoring respectively. However, nodes in these networks are susceptible to high failure rate due to battery depletion, environmental changes and malicious destruction. Since each node operates with limited sources of power, energy efficiency is an important metric to be considered for designing communication schemes for MANET and WSN. Energy consumed by nodes in MANET or WSN can be reduced by optimizing the internode transmission power which is uniform even with dynamic routing protocols like AODV. However, the transmission power required for internode communication depends on the wireless link quality which inturn depends on various factors like received signal power, propagation path loss, fading, multi-user interference and topological changes. In this paper, link quality based power efficient routing protocol (LQ-PERP) is proposed which saves the battery power of nodes by optimizing the power during data transmission. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using QualNet network simulator by considering metrics like total energy consumed in nodes, throughput, packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay and jitter

Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting: Modeling and simulation based on a practical architecture using real radiation levels

This paper presents a new energy-harvesting model for a network simulator that implements super-capacitor energy storage with solar energy-harvesting recharge. The model is easily extensible, and other energyharvesting systems, or different energy storages, can be further developed. Moreover, code can be conveniently reused as the implementation is entirely uncoupled from the radio and node models. Real radiation data are obtained from available online databases in order to dynamically calculate super-capacitor charge and discharge. Such novelty enables the evaluation of energy evolution on a network of sensor nodes at various physical world locations and during different seasons. The model is validated against a real and fully working prototype, and good result correlation is shown. Furthermore, various experiments using the ns-3 simulator were conducted, demonstrating the utility of the model in assisting the research and development of the deployment of everlasting wireless sensor networks.This work was supported by the CICYT (research projects CTM2011-29691-C02-01 and TIN2011-28435-C03-01) and UPV research project SP20120889.Climent, S.; Sánchez Matías, AM.; Blanc Clavero, S.; Capella Hernández, JV.; Ors Carot, R. (2013). Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting: Modeling and simulation based on a practical architecture using real radiation levels. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3151S119Akyildiz, I. F., & Vuran, M. C. (2010). Wireless Sensor Networks. doi:10.1002/9780470515181Seah, W. K. G., Tan, Y. K., & Chan, A. T. S. (2012). Research in Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks and the Challenges Ahead. Autonomous Sensor Networks, 73-93. doi:10.1007/5346_2012_27Vullers, R., Schaijk, R., Visser, H., Penders, J., & Hoof, C. (2010). Energy Harvesting for Autonomous Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2(2), 29-38. doi:10.1109/mssc.2010.936667Ammar, Y., Buhrig, A., Marzencki, M., Charlot, B., Basrour, S., Matou, K., & Renaudin, M. (2005). Wireless sensor network node with asynchronous architecture and vibration harvesting micro power generator. Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies - sOc-EUSAI ’05. doi:10.1145/1107548.1107618Vijayaraghavan, K., & Rajamani, R. (2007). Active Control Based Energy Harvesting for Battery-Less Wireless Traffic Sensors. 2007 American Control Conference. doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282842Bottner, H., Nurnus, J., Gavrikov, A., Kuhner, G., Jagle, M., Kunzel, C., … Schlereth, K.-H. (2004). New thermoelectric components using microsystem technologies. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13(3), 414-420. doi:10.1109/jmems.2004.828740Mateu L Codrea C Lucas N Pollak M Spies P Energy harvesting for wireless communication systems using thermogenerators Conference on Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems (DCIS) 2006AEMet Agencia Estatal de Meteorolgía 2013 http//www.aemet.esPANGAEA Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science 2013 http://www.pangaea.de/Zeng, K., Ren, K., Lou, W., & Moran, P. J. (2007). Energy aware efficient geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks with environmental energy supply. Wireless Networks, 15(1), 39-51. doi:10.1007/s11276-007-0022-0Hasenfratz, D., Meier, A., Moser, C., Chen, J.-J., & Thiele, L. (2010). Analysis, Comparison, and Optimization of Routing Protocols for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing. doi:10.1109/sutc.2010.35Noh, D. K., & Hur, J. (2012). Using a dynamic backbone for efficient data delivery in solar-powered WSNs. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(4), 1277-1284. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.01.012Lin, L., Shroff, N. B., & Srikant, R. (2007). Asymptotically Optimal Energy-Aware Routing for Multihop Wireless Networks With Renewable Energy Sources. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 15(5), 1021-1034. doi:10.1109/tnet.2007.896173Ferry, N., Ducloyer, S., Julien, N., & Jutel, D. (2011). Power/Energy Estimator for Designing WSN Nodes with Ambient Energy Harvesting Feature. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2011(1), 242386. doi:10.1155/2011/242386Glaser, J., Weber, D., Madani, S., & Mahlknecht, S. (2008). Power Aware Simulation Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks and Nodes. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2008(1), 369178. doi:10.1155/2008/369178De Mil, P., Jooris, B., Tytgat, L., Catteeuw, R., Moerman, I., Demeester, P., & Kamerman, A. (2010). Design and Implementation of a Generic Energy-Harvesting Framework Applied to the Evaluation of a Large-Scale Electronic Shelf-Labeling Wireless Sensor Network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2010(1). doi:10.1155/2010/343690Castagnetti, A., Pegatoquet, A., Belleudy, C., & Auguin, M. (2012). A framework for modeling and simulating energy harvesting WSN nodes with efficient power management policies. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-3963-2012-8Alippi, C., & Galperti, C. (2008). An Adaptive System for Optimal Solar Energy Harvesting in Wireless Sensor Network Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 55(6), 1742-1750. doi:10.1109/tcsi.2008.922023Xiaofan Jiang, Polastre, J., & Culler, D. (s. f.). Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. doi:10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440974Simjee, F., & Chou, P. H. (2006). Everlast. Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design - ISLPED ’06. doi:10.1145/1165573.1165619Sánchez, A., Climent, S., Blanc, S., Capella, J. V., & Piqueras, I. (2011). WSN with energy-harvesting. Proceedings of the 6th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks - PM2HW2N ’11. doi:10.1145/2069087.2069091Renner C Jessen J Turau V Lifetime prediction for supercapacitor-powered wireless sensor nodes Proc. of the 8th GI/ITG KuVS Fachgesprächİ Drahtlose Sensornetze(FGSN09) 2009TI Analog, Embedded Processing, Semiconductor Company, Texas Instruments 2013 http//www.ti.comWSNVAL Wireless Sensor Networks Valencia 2013 www.wsnval.comSanchez, A., Blanc, S., Yuste, P., & Serrano, J. J. (2011). RFID Based Acoustic Wake-Up System for Underwater Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems. doi:10.1109/mass.2011.103Fan, K.-W., Zheng, Z., & Sinha, P. (2008). Steady and fair rate allocation for rechargeable sensors in perpetual sensor networks. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems - SenSys ’08. doi:10.1145/1460412.1460436Moser, C., Thiele, L., Brunelli, D., & Benini, L. (2010). Adaptive Power Management for Environmentally Powered Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 59(4), 478-491. doi:10.1109/tc.2009.15

Optimized Cluster-Based Dynamic Energy-Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks in Agriculture Precision

[EN] Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are becoming one of the demanding platforms, where sensor nodes are sensing and monitoring the physical or environmental conditions and transmit the data to the base station via multihop routing. Agriculture sector also adopted these networks to promote innovations for environmental friendly farming methods, lower the management cost, and achieve scientific cultivation. Due to limited capabilities, the sensor nodes have suffered with energy issues and complex routing processes and lead to data transmission failure and delay in the sensor-based agriculture fields. Due to these limitations, the sensor nodes near the base station are always relaying on it and cause extra burden on base station or going into useless state. To address these issues, this study proposes a Gateway Clustering Energy-Efficient Centroid- (GCEEC-) based routing protocol where cluster head is selected from the centroid position and gateway nodes are selected from each cluster. Gateway node reduces the data load from cluster head nodes and forwards the data towards the base station. Simulation has performed to evaluate the proposed protocol with state-of-the-art protocols. The experimental results indicated the better performance of proposed protocol and provide more feasible WSN-based monitoring for temperature, humidity, and illumination in agriculture sector.This work has also been partially supported by the European Union through the ERANETMED (Euromediterranean Cooperation through ERANET joint activities and beyond) project ERANETMED3-227 SMARTWATIR.Qureshi, KN.; Bashir, MU.; Lloret, J.; León Fernández, A. (2020). Optimized Cluster-Based Dynamic Energy-Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks in Agriculture Precision. Journal of Sensors. 2020:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9040395S1192020Sneha, K., Kamath, R., Balachandra, M., & Prabhu, S. (2019). New Gossiping Protocol for Routing Data in Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture. Soft Computing and Signal Processing, 139-152. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3393-4_15Qureshi, K. N., Abdullah, A. H., Bashir, F., Iqbal, S., & Awan, K. M. (2018). Cluster-based data dissemination, cluster head formation under sparse, and dense traffic conditions for vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 31(8), e3533. doi:10.1002/dac.3533Rault, T., Bouabdallah, A., & Challal, Y. (2014). Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey. Computer Networks, 67, 104-122. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.027Feng, X., Zhang, J., Ren, C., & Guan, T. (2018). An Unequal Clustering Algorithm Concerned With Time-Delay for Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 6, 33895-33909. doi:10.1109/access.2018.2847036Savaglio, C., Pace, P., Aloi, G., Liotta, A., & Fortino, G. (2019). Lightweight Reinforcement Learning for Energy Efficient Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access, 7, 29355-29364. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2902371Srbinovska, M., Gavrovski, C., Dimcev, V., Krkoleva, A., & Borozan, V. (2015). Environmental parameters monitoring in precision agriculture using wireless sensor networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 88, 297-307. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.036Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Diaz, J. (2009). A Cluster-Based Architecture to Structure the Topology of Parallel Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 9(12), 10513-10544. doi:10.3390/s91210513Qureshi, K. N., Din, S., Jeon, G., & Piccialli, F. (2020). Link quality and energy utilization based preferable next hop selection routing for wireless body area networks. Computer Communications, 149, 382-392. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.030Kumar, S. A., & Ilango, P. (2017). The Impact of Wireless Sensor Network in the Field of Precision Agriculture: A Review. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(1), 685-698. doi:10.1007/s11277-017-4890-zAnisi, M. H., Abdul-Salaam, G., & Abdullah, A. H. (2014). A survey of wireless sensor network approaches and their energy consumption for monitoring farm fields in precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 16(2), 216-238. doi:10.1007/s11119-014-9371-8Long, D. S., & McCallum, J. D. (2015). On-combine, multi-sensor data collection for post-harvest assessment of environmental stress in wheat. Precision Agriculture, 16(5), 492-504. doi:10.1007/s11119-015-9391-zFu, X., Fortino, G., Li, W., Pace, P., & Yang, Y. (2019). WSNs-assisted opportunistic network for low-latency message forwarding in sparse settings. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 223-237. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.08.031Mehmood, A., Khan, S., Shams, B., & Lloret, J. (2013). Energy-efficient multi-level and distance-aware clustering mechanism for WSNs. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(5), 972-989. doi:10.1002/dac.2720Pantazis, N. A., Nikolidakis, S. A., & Vergados, D. D. (2013). Energy-Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(2), 551-591. doi:10.1109/surv.2012.062612.00084De Farias, C. M., Pirmez, L., Fortino, G., & Guerrieri, A. (2019). A multi-sensor data fusion technique using data correlations among multiple applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 109-118. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.09.034Rao, P. C. S., Jana, P. K., & Banka, H. (2016). A particle swarm optimization based energy efficient cluster head selection algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 23(7), 2005-2020. doi:10.1007/s11276-016-1270-7Fu, X., Fortino, G., Pace, P., Aloi, G., & Li, W. (2020). Environment-fusion multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Information Fusion, 53, 4-19. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.001Liu, X. (2015). Atypical Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(10), 5372-5383. doi:10.1109/jsen.2015.2445796Jan, N., Javaid, N., Javaid, Q., Alrajeh, N., Alam, M., Khan, Z. A., & Niaz, I. A. (2017). A Balanced Energy-Consuming and Hole-Alleviating Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access, 5, 6134-6150. doi:10.1109/access.2017.2676004Gupta, G. P., Misra, M., & Garg, K. (2014). Energy and trust aware mobile agent migration protocol for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 41, 300-311. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.003Safa, H., Karam, M., & Moussa, B. (2014). PHAODV: Power aware heterogeneous routing protocol for MANETs. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 46, 60-71. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.07.035Liu, X. (2015). An Optimal-Distance-Based Transmission Strategy for Lifetime Maximization of Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(6), 3484-3491. doi:10.1109/jsen.2014.2372340Brar, G. S., Rani, S., Chopra, V., Malhotra, R., Song, H., & Ahmed, S. H. (2016). Energy Efficient Direction-Based PDORP Routing Protocol for WSN. IEEE Access, 4, 3182-3194. doi:10.1109/access.2016.2576475Abo-Zahhad, M., Ahmed, S. M., Sabor, N., & Sasaki, S. (2015). Mobile Sink-Based Adaptive Immune Energy-Efficient Clustering Protocol for Improving the Lifetime and Stability Period of Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(8), 4576-4586. doi:10.1109/jsen.2015.2424296Huynh, T.-T., Dinh-Duc, A.-V., & Tran, C.-H. (2016). Delay-constrained energy-efficient cluster-based multi-hop routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 18(4), 580-588. doi:10.1109/jcn.2016.000081Shen, J., Wang, A., Wang, C., Hung, P. C. K., & Lai, C.-F. (2017). An Efficient Centroid-Based Routing Protocol for Energy Management in WSN-Assisted IoT. IEEE Access, 5, 18469-18479. doi:10.1109/access.2017.2749606Awan, K. M., Shah, P. A., Iqbal, K., Gillani, S., Ahmad, W., & Nam, Y. (2019). Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019, 1-20. doi:10.1155/2019/6470359Sajwan, M., Gosain, D., & Sharma, A. K. (2018). CAMP: cluster aided multi-path routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 25(5), 2603-2620. doi:10.1007/s11276-018-1689-0Varga, A. (2010). OMNeT++. Modeling and Tools for Network Simulation, 35-59. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12331-3_3Lartillot, O., Toiviainen, P., & Eerola, T. (2008). A Matlab Toolbox for Music Information Retrieval. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, 261-268. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_31Mathur, P., Nielsen, R. H., Prasad, N. R., & Prasad, R. (2016). Data collection using miniature aerial vehicles in wireless sensor networks. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 6(1), 17-25. doi:10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0120Zou, T., Lin, S., Feng, Q., & Chen, Y. (2016). Energy-Efficient Control with Harvesting Predictions for Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 16(1), 53. doi:10.3390/s16010053Song, Y., Ma, J., Zhang, X., & Feng, Y. (2012). Design of Wireless Sensor Network-Based Greenhouse Environment Monitoring and Automatic Control System. Journal of Networks, 7(5). doi:10.4304/jnw.7.5.838-844Nikolidakis, S., Kandris, D., Vergados, D., & Douligeris, C. (2013). Energy Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Through Balanced Clustering. Algorithms, 6(1), 29-42. doi:10.3390/a6010029Ndzi, D. L., Harun, A., Ramli, F. M., Kamarudin, M. L., Zakaria, A., Shakaff, A. Y. M., … Farook, R. S. (2014). Wireless sensor network coverage measurement and planning in mixed crop farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 105, 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.04.01

Hybrid Heterogeneous Routing Scheme for Improved Network Performance in WSNs for Animal Tracking

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) experiences several technical challenges such as limited energy, short transmission range, limited storage capacities, and limited computational capabilities. Moreover, the sensor nodes are deployed randomly and massively over an inaccessible or hostile region. Hence WSNs are vulnerable to adversaries and are usually operated in a dynamic and unreliable environment. Animal tracking using wireless sensors is one such application of WSN where power management plays a vital role. In this paper, an energy-efficient hybrid routing method is proposed that divides the whole network into smaller regions based on sensor location and chooses the routing scheme accordingly. The sensor network consists of a base station (BS) located at a distant place outside the network, and a relay node is placed inside the network for direct communications from nodes nearer to it. The nodes are further divided into two categories based on the supplied energy; such that the ones located far away from BS and relay have higher energy than the nodes nearer to them. The network performance of the proposed method is compared with protocols like LEACH, SEP, and SNRP, considering parameters like stability period, throughput and energy consumption. Simulation result shows that the proposed method outperforms other methods with better network performance