320 research outputs found

    Exact Covers via Determinants

    Full text link
    Given a k-uniform hypergraph on n vertices, partitioned in k equal parts such that every hyperedge includes one vertex from each part, the k-dimensional matching problem asks whether there is a disjoint collection of the hyperedges which covers all vertices. We show it can be solved by a randomized polynomial space algorithm in time O*(2^(n(k-2)/k)). The O*() notation hides factors polynomial in n and k. When we drop the partition constraint and permit arbitrary hyperedges of cardinality k, we obtain the exact cover by k-sets problem. We show it can be solved by a randomized polynomial space algorithm in time O*(c_k^n), where c_3=1.496, c_4=1.642, c_5=1.721, and provide a general bound for larger k. Both results substantially improve on the previous best algorithms for these problems, especially for small k, and follow from the new observation that Lovasz' perfect matching detection via determinants (1979) admits an embedding in the recently proposed inclusion-exclusion counting scheme for set covers, despite its inability to count the perfect matchings

    Exact Covers via Determinants

    Get PDF
    Given a kk-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices, partitioned in kk equal parts such that every hyperedge includes one vertex from each part, the kk-Dimensional Matching problem asks whether there is a disjoint collection of the hyperedges which covers all vertices. We show it can be solved by a randomized polynomial space algorithm in O∗(2n(k−2)/k)O^*(2^{n(k-2)/k}) time. The O∗()O^*() notation hides factors polynomial in nn and kk. The general Exact Cover by kk-Sets problem asks the same when the partition constraint is dropped and arbitrary hyperedges of cardinality kk are permitted. We show it can be solved by a randomized polynomial space algorithm in O∗(ckn)O^*(c_k^n) time, where c3=1.496,c4=1.642,c5=1.721c_3=1.496, c_4=1.642, c_5=1.721, and provide a general bound for larger kk. Both results substantially improve on the previous best algorithms for these problems, especially for small kk. They follow from the new observation that Lov\u27asz\u27 perfect matching detection via determinants (Lov\u27asz, 1979) admits an embedding in the recently proposed inclusion--exclusion counting scheme for set covers, emph{despite} its inability to count the perfect matchings

    Subject index volumes 1–92

    Get PDF
    • …
    corecore