63 research outputs found
Treating Coordination with Datalog Grammars
In previous work we studied a new type of DCGs, Datalog grammars, which are
inspired on database theory. Their efficiency was shown to be better than that
of their DCG counterparts under (terminating) OLDT-resolution. In this article
we motivate a variant of Datalog grammars which allows us a meta-grammatical
treatment of coordination. This treatment improves in some respects over
previous work on coordination in logic grammars, although more research is
needed for testing it in other respects
Constraint-based semantics
Montague\u27s famous characterization of the homomorphic relation between syntax and semantics naturally gives way in computational applications to CONSTRAINT-BASED formulations. This was originally motivated by the close harmony it provides with syntax, which is universally processed in a constraint-based fashion. Employing the same processing discipline in syntax and semantics allows that their processing (and indeed other processing) can be as tightly coupled as one wishes - indeed, there needn\u27t be any fundamental distinction between them at all. In this paper, we point out several advantages of the constraint-based view of semantics processing over standard views. These include (i) the opportunity to incorporate nonsyntactic constraints on semantics, such as those arising from phonology and context; (ii) the opportunity to formulate principles which generalize over syntax and semantics, such as those found in HEAD-DRIVEN PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR; (iii) a characterization of semantic ambiguity, which in turn provides a framework in which to describe disambiguation, and (iv) the opportunity to underspecify meanings in a way difficult to reconcile with other views. The last point is illustrated with an application to scope ambiguity in which a scheme is developed which underspecifies scope but eschews auxiliary levels of logical form
A feature-based syntax/semantics interface
Syntax/Semantics interfaces using unification-based or feature-based formalisms are increasingly common in the existing computational linguistics literature. The primary reason for attempting to specify a syntax/semantics interface in feature structures is that it harmonizes so well with the way in which syntax is now normally described; this close harmony means that syntactic and semantic processing (and indeed other processing, see below) can be as tightly coupled as one wishes - indeed, there need not be any fundamental distinction between them at all. In this paper, we first point out several advantages of the unification-based view of the syntax/semantics interface over standard views. These include (i) a more flexible relation to nonsyntactic constraints on semantics; (ii) a characterization of semantic ambiguity, which in turn provides a framework in which to describe disambiguation, and (iii) the opportunity to underspecify meanings in a way difficult to reconcile with other views. The last point is illustrated with an application to the notorious scope ambiguity problem
Recommended from our members
Simpler TAG semantics through synchronization
In recent years Laura Kallmeyer, Maribel Romero, and their collaborators
have led research on TAG semantics through a series of papers refining a system of TAG semantics computation. Kallmeyer and Romero bring together the lessons of these attempts with a set of desirable properties that such a
system should have. First, computation of the semantics of a sentence should rely only on the relationships expressed in the TAG derivation tree. Second, the generated semantics should compactly represent all valid interpretations of the input sentence, in particular with respect to quantifier scope. Third, the formalism should not, if possible, increase the expressivity of the TAG formalism. We revive the proposal of using synchronous TAG (STAG) to simultaneously generate syntactic and semantic representations for an input sentence. Although STAG meets the three requirements above, no serious attempt had previously been made to determine whether it can model the
semantic constructions that have proved difficult for other approaches. In this paper we begin exploration of this question by proposing STAG analyses of many of the hard cases that have spurred the research in this area. We reframe the TAG semantics problem in the context of the STAG formalism
and in the process present a simple, intuitive base for further exploration of TAG semantics. We provide analyses that demonstrate how STAG can handle quantifier scope, long-distance WH-movement, interaction of raising verbs and adverbs, attitude verbs and quantifiers, relative clauses, and quantifiers
within prepositional phrases.Engineering and Applied Science
Recommended from our members
Solving Unrestricted Dominance Graphs
We present the first ever algorithm for solving unrestricted dominance graphs. The algorithm extends existing polynomial solvers for restricted classes of dominance graphs, which are not sufficient to model newer theories of scope ambiguity. Using the new solver, these theories now have access to an efficient solver for the first time. The solver runs in cubic time; for those graph classes that could be solved in the past, the runtime is reduced to the same quadratic time that the most efficient previous solvers achieved
- …