323 research outputs found
Coalgebraic completeness-via-canonicity for distributive substructural logics
We prove strong completeness of a range of substructural logics with respect
to a natural poset-based relational semantics using a coalgebraic version of
completeness-via-canonicity. By formalizing the problem in the language of
coalgebraic logics, we develop a modular theory which covers a wide variety of
different logics under a single framework, and lends itself to further
extensions. Moreover, we believe that the coalgebraic framework provides a
systematic and principled way to study the relationship between resource models
on the semantics side, and substructural logics on the syntactic side.Comment: 36 page
An Abstract Approach to Consequence Relations
We generalise the Blok-J\'onsson account of structural consequence relations,
later developed by Galatos, Tsinakis and other authors, in such a way as to
naturally accommodate multiset consequence. While Blok and J\'onsson admit, in
place of sheer formulas, a wider range of syntactic units to be manipulated in
deductions (including sequents or equations), these objects are invariably
aggregated via set-theoretical union. Our approach is more general in that
non-idempotent forms of premiss and conclusion aggregation, including multiset
sum and fuzzy set union, are considered. In their abstract form, thus,
deductive relations are defined as additional compatible preorderings over
certain partially ordered monoids. We investigate these relations using
categorical methods, and provide analogues of the main results obtained in the
general theory of consequence relations. Then we focus on the driving example
of multiset deductive relations, providing variations of the methods of matrix
semantics and Hilbert systems in Abstract Algebraic Logic
A Labelled Analytic Theorem Proving Environment for Categorial Grammar
We present a system for the investigation of computational properties of
categorial grammar parsing based on a labelled analytic tableaux theorem
prover. This proof method allows us to take a modular approach, in which the
basic grammar can be kept constant, while a range of categorial calculi can be
captured by assigning different properties to the labelling algebra. The
theorem proving strategy is particularly well suited to the treatment of
categorial grammar, because it allows us to distribute the computational cost
between the algorithm which deals with the grammatical types and the algebraic
checker which constrains the derivation.Comment: 11 pages, LaTeX2e, uses examples.sty and a4wide.st
A graph-theoretic account of logics
A graph-theoretic account of logics is explored based on the general
notion of m-graph (that is, a graph where each edge can have a finite
sequence of nodes as source). Signatures, interpretation structures and
deduction systems are seen as m-graphs. After defining a category freely
generated by a m-graph, formulas and expressions in general can be seen
as morphisms. Moreover, derivations involving rule instantiation are also
morphisms. Soundness and completeness theorems are proved. As a consequence of the generality of the approach our results apply to very different
logics encompassing, among others, substructural logics as well as logics
with nondeterministic semantics, and subsume all logics endowed with an
algebraic semantics
Stone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics
Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and
relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because -- in
addition to elegant abstraction -- they strengthen soundness and completeness
to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic
and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic
treatment of Stone-type duality for the structures that interpret bunched
logics, starting with the weakest systems, recovering the familiar BI and
Boolean BI (BBI), and extending to both classical and intuitionistic Separation
Logic. We demonstrate the uniformity and modularity of this analysis by
additionally capturing the bunched logics obtained by extending BI and BBI with
modalities and multiplicative connectives corresponding to disjunction,
negation and falsum. This includes the logic of separating modalities (LSM), De
Morgan BI (DMBI), Classical BI (CBI), and the sub-classical family of logics
extending Bi-intuitionistic (B)BI (Bi(B)BI). We additionally obtain as
corollaries soundness and completeness theorems for the specific Kripke-style
models of these logics as presented in the literature: for DMBI, the
sub-classical logics extending BiBI and a new bunched logic, Concurrent Kleene
BI (connecting our work to Concurrent Separation Logic), this is the first time
soundness and completeness theorems have been proved. We thus obtain a
comprehensive semantic account of the multiplicative variants of all standard
propositional connectives in the bunched logic setting. This approach
synthesises a variety of techniques from modal, substructural and categorical
logic and contextualizes the "resource semantics" interpretation underpinning
Separation Logic amongst them
Constructive Logic with Strong Negation is a Substructural Logic. II
The goal of this two-part series of papers is to show that constructive logic with strong negation N is definitionally equivalent to a certain axiomatic extension NFL ew of the substructural logic FL ew . The main result of Part I of this series [41] shows that the equivalent variety semantics of N (namely, the variety of Nelson algebras) and the equivalent variety semantics of NFL ew (namely, a certain variety of FL ew -algebras) are term equivalent. In this paper, the term equivalence result of Part I [41] is lifted to the setting of deductive systems to establish the definitional equivalence of the logics N and NFL ew . It follows from the definitional equivalence of these systems that constructive logic with strong negation is a substructural logi
Modal Linear Logic in Higher Order Logic, an experiment in Coq
The sequent calculus of classical modal linear logic KDT 4lin is coded in the higher order logic using the proof assistant COQ. The encoding has been done using two-level meta reasoning in Coq. KDT 4lin has been encoded as an object logic by inductively defining the set of modal linear logic formulas, the sequent relation on lists of these formulas, and some lemmas to work with lists.This modal linear logic has been argued to be a good candidate for epistemic applications. As examples some epistemic problems have been coded and proven in our encoding in Coq::the problem of logical omniscience and an epistemic puzzle: ’King, three wise men and five hats’
- …