13,339 research outputs found
A Metric Encoding for Bounded Model Checking (extended version)
In Bounded Model Checking both the system model and the checked property are
translated into a Boolean formula to be analyzed by a SAT-solver. We introduce
a new encoding technique which is particularly optimized for managing
quantitative future and past metric temporal operators, typically found in
properties of hard real time systems. The encoding is simple and intuitive in
principle, but it is made more complex by the presence, typical of the Bounded
Model Checking technique, of backward and forward loops used to represent an
ultimately periodic infinite domain by a finite structure. We report and
comment on the new encoding technique and on an extensive set of experiments
carried out to assess its feasibility and effectiveness
Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment?
Many reasoning problems are based on the problem of satisfiability (SAT).
While SAT itself becomes easy when restricting the structure of the formulas in
a certain way, the situation is more opaque for more involved decision
problems. We consider here the CardMinSat problem which asks, given a
propositional formula and an atom , whether is true in some
cardinality-minimal model of . This problem is easy for the Horn
fragment, but, as we will show in this paper, remains -complete (and
thus -hard) for the Krom fragment (which is given by formulas in
CNF where clauses have at most two literals). We will make use of this fact to
study the complexity of reasoning tasks in belief revision and logic-based
abduction and show that, while in some cases the restriction to Krom formulas
leads to a decrease of complexity, in others it does not. We thus also consider
the CardMinSat problem with respect to additional restrictions to Krom formulas
towards a better understanding of the tractability frontier of such problems
Instructing implicit processes: when instructions to approach or avoid influence implicit but not explicit evaluation
Previous research has shown that linking approach or avoidance actions to novel stimuli through mere instructions causes changes in the implicit evaluation of these stimuli even when the actions are never performed. In two high-powered experiments (total N=1147), we examined whether effects of approach-avoidance instructions on implicit evaluations are mediated by changes in explicit evaluations. Participants first received information about the evaluative properties of two fictitious social groups (e.g., Niffites are good; Luupites are bad) and then received instructions to approach one group and avoid the other group. We observed an effect of approach avoidance instructions on implicit but not explicit evaluations of the groups, even when these instructions were incompatible with the previously obtained evaluative information. These results indicate that approach avoidance instructions allow for unintentional changes in implicit evaluations. We discuss implications for current theories of implicit evaluation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Discounting in LTL
In recent years, there is growing need and interest in formalizing and
reasoning about the quality of software and hardware systems. As opposed to
traditional verification, where one handles the question of whether a system
satisfies, or not, a given specification, reasoning about quality addresses the
question of \emph{how well} the system satisfies the specification. One
direction in this effort is to refine the "eventually" operators of temporal
logic to {\em discounting operators}: the satisfaction value of a specification
is a value in , where the longer it takes to fulfill eventuality
requirements, the smaller the satisfaction value is.
In this paper we introduce an augmentation by discounting of Linear Temporal
Logic (LTL), and study it, as well as its combination with propositional
quality operators. We show that one can augment LTL with an arbitrary set of
discounting functions, while preserving the decidability of the model-checking
problem. Further augmenting the logic with unary propositional quality
operators preserves decidability, whereas adding an average-operator makes some
problems undecidable. We also discuss the complexity of the problem, as well as
various extensions
- …