13,516 research outputs found
The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants
Reasoning is a crucial part of natural language argumentation. To comprehend
an argument, one must analyze its warrant, which explains why its claim follows
from its premises. As arguments are highly contextualized, warrants are usually
presupposed and left implicit. Thus, the comprehension does not only require
language understanding and logic skills, but also depends on common sense. In
this paper we develop a methodology for reconstructing warrants systematically.
We operationalize it in a scalable crowdsourcing process, resulting in a freely
licensed dataset with warrants for 2k authentic arguments from news comments.
On this basis, we present a new challenging task, the argument reasoning
comprehension task. Given an argument with a claim and a premise, the goal is
to choose the correct implicit warrant from two options. Both warrants are
plausible and lexically close, but lead to contradicting claims. A solution to
this task will define a substantial step towards automatic warrant
reconstruction. However, experiments with several neural attention and language
models reveal that current approaches do not suffice.Comment: Accepted as NAACL 2018 Long Paper; see details on the front pag
Crowdsourcing Argumentation Structures in Chinese Hotel Reviews
Argumentation mining aims at automatically extracting the premises-claim
discourse structures in natural language texts. There is a great demand for
argumentation corpora for customer reviews. However, due to the controversial
nature of the argumentation annotation task, there exist very few large-scale
argumentation corpora for customer reviews. In this work, we novelly use the
crowdsourcing technique to collect argumentation annotations in Chinese hotel
reviews. As the first Chinese argumentation dataset, our corpus includes 4814
argument component annotations and 411 argument relation annotations, and its
annotations qualities are comparable to some widely used argumentation corpora
in other languages.Comment: 6 pages,3 figures,This article has been submitted to "The 2017 IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC2017)
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational
linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation.
In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal
with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of
registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web
discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and
argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation
model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold
standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several
machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data,
source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses.
Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is
a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in
User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17
A Review on Software Architectures for Heterogeneous Platforms
The increasing demands for computing performance have been a reality
regardless of the requirements for smaller and more energy efficient devices.
Throughout the years, the strategy adopted by industry was to increase the
robustness of a single processor by increasing its clock frequency and mounting
more transistors so more calculations could be executed. However, it is known
that the physical limits of such processors are being reached, and one way to
fulfill such increasing computing demands has been to adopt a strategy based on
heterogeneous computing, i.e., using a heterogeneous platform containing more
than one type of processor. This way, different types of tasks can be executed
by processors that are specialized in them. Heterogeneous computing, however,
poses a number of challenges to software engineering, especially in the
architecture and deployment phases. In this paper, we conduct an empirical
study that aims at discovering the state-of-the-art in software architecture
for heterogeneous computing, with focus on deployment. We conduct a systematic
mapping study that retrieved 28 studies, which were critically assessed to
obtain an overview of the research field. We identified gaps and trends that
can be used by both researchers and practitioners as guides to further
investigate the topic
Detecting Large Concept Extensions for Conceptual Analysis
When performing a conceptual analysis of a concept, philosophers are
interested in all forms of expression of a concept in a text---be it direct or
indirect, explicit or implicit. In this paper, we experiment with topic-based
methods of automating the detection of concept expressions in order to
facilitate philosophical conceptual analysis. We propose six methods based on
LDA, and evaluate them on a new corpus of court decision that we had annotated
by experts and non-experts. Our results indicate that these methods can yield
important improvements over the keyword heuristic, which is often used as a
concept detection heuristic in many contexts. While more work remains to be
done, this indicates that detecting concepts through topics can serve as a
general-purpose method for at least some forms of concept expression that are
not captured using naive keyword approaches
Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems : a literature survey
Peer reviewedPostprin
Textual Stylistic Variation: Choices, Genres and Individuals
This chapter argues for more informed target metrics for the statistical processing of stylistic variation in text collections. Much as operationalized relevance proved a useful goal to strive for in information retrieval, research in textual stylistics, whether application oriented or philologically inclined, needs goals formulated in terms of pertinence, relevance, and utility — notions that agree with reader ex- perience of text. Differences readers are aware of are mostly based on utility — not on textual characteristics per se. Mostly, readers report stylistic differences in terms of genres. Genres, while vague and undefined, are well-established and talked about: very early on, readers learn to distinguish genres. This chapter discusses variation given by genre, and contrasts it to variation occasioned by individual choice
- …