Mathematical Programming formulations for the efficient solution of the kk-sum approval voting problem

In this paper we address the problem of electing a committee among a set of $m$ candidates and on the basis of the preferences of a set of $n$ voters. We consider the approval voting method in which each voter can approve as many candidates as she/he likes by expressing a preference profile (boolean $m$-vector). In order to elect a committee, a voting rule must be established to `transform' the $n$ voters' profiles into a winning committee. The problem is widely studied in voting theory; for a variety of voting rules the problem was shown to be computationally difficult and approximation algorithms and heuristic techniques were proposed in the literature. In this paper we follow an Ordered Weighted Averaging approach and study the $k$-sum approval voting (optimization) problem in the general case $1 \leq k <n$. For this problem we provide different mathematical programming formulations that allow us to solve it in an exact solution framework. We provide computational results showing that our approach is efficient for medium-size test problems ($n$ up to 200, $m$ up to 60) since in all tested cases it was able to find the exact optimal solution in very short computational times

Induced aggregation operators in decision making with the Dempster-Shafer belief structure

We study the induced aggregation operators. The analysis begins with a revision of some basic concepts such as the induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA) operator and the induced ordered weighted geometric (IOWG) operator. We then analyze the problem of decision making with Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. We suggest the use of induced aggregation operators in decision making with Dempster-Shafer theory. We focus on the aggregation step and examine some of its main properties, including the distinction between descending and ascending orders and different families of induced operators. Finally, we present an illustrative example in which the results obtained using different types of aggregation operators can be seen.aggregation operators, dempster-shafer belief structure, uncertainty, iowa operator, decision making

Optimal scaling of the ADMM algorithm for distributed quadratic programming

This paper presents optimal scaling of the alternating directions method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm for a class of distributed quadratic programming problems. The scaling corresponds to the ADMM step-size and relaxation parameter, as well as the edge-weights of the underlying communication graph. We optimize these parameters to yield the smallest convergence factor of the algorithm. Explicit expressions are derived for the step-size and relaxation parameter, as well as for the corresponding convergence factor. Numerical simulations justify our results and highlight the benefits of optimally scaling the ADMM algorithm.Comment: Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. Prior work was presented at the 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 201

Generalizing the Min-Max Regret Criterion using Ordered Weighted Averaging

In decision making under uncertainty, several criteria have been studied to aggregate the performance of a solution over multiple possible scenarios, including the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) criterion and min-max regret. This paper introduces a novel generalization of min-max regret, leveraging the modeling power of OWA to enable a more nuanced expression of preferences in handling regret values. This new OWA regret approach is studied both theoretically and numerically. We derive several properties, including polynomially solvable and hard cases, and introduce an approximation algorithm. Through computational experiments using artificial and real-world data, we demonstrate the advantages of our OWAR method over the conventional min-max regret approach, alongside the effectiveness of the proposed clustering heuristics