75 research outputs found
Weak Alternating Timed Automata
Alternating timed automata on infinite words are considered. The main result
is a characterization of acceptance conditions for which the emptiness problem
for these automata is decidable. This result implies new decidability results
for fragments of timed temporal logics. It is also shown that, unlike for MITL,
the characterisation remains the same even if no punctual constraints are
allowed
Logics Meet 1-Clock Alternating Timed Automata
This paper investigates a decidable and highly expressive real time logic QkMSO which is obtained by extending MSO[<] with guarded quantification using block of less than k metric quantifiers. The resulting logic is shown to be expressively equivalent to 1-clock ATA where loops are without clock resets, as well as, RatMTL, a powerful extension of MTL[U_I] with regular expressions. We also establish 4-variable property for QkMSO and characterize the expressive power of its 2-variable fragment. Thus, the paper presents progress towards expressively complete logics for 1-clock ATA
Relating timed and register automata
Timed automata and register automata are well-known models of computation
over timed and data words respectively. The former has clocks that allow to
test the lapse of time between two events, whilst the latter includes registers
that can store data values for later comparison. Although these two models
behave in appearance differently, several decision problems have the same
(un)decidability and complexity results for both models. As a prominent
example, emptiness is decidable for alternating automata with one clock or
register, both with non-primitive recursive complexity. This is not by chance.
This work confirms that there is indeed a tight relationship between the two
models. We show that a run of a timed automaton can be simulated by a register
automaton, and conversely that a run of a register automaton can be simulated
by a timed automaton. Our results allow to transfer complexity and decidability
results back and forth between these two kinds of models. We justify the
usefulness of these reductions by obtaining new results on register automata.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS'10, arXiv:1011.601
Satisfiability Checking of Multi-Variable TPTL with Unilateral Intervals Is PSPACE-Complete
We investigate the decidability of the fragment of Timed
Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL). We show that the satisfiability checking
of TPTL is PSPACE-complete. Moreover, even its 1-variable fragment
(1-TPTL) is strictly more expressive than Metric Interval Temporal
Logic (MITL) for which satisfiability checking is EXPSPACE complete. Hence, we
have a strictly more expressive logic with computationally easier
satisfiability checking. To the best of our knowledge, TPTL is the
first multi-variable fragment of TPTL for which satisfiability checking is
decidable without imposing any bounds/restrictions on the timed words (e.g.
bounded variability, bounded time, etc.). The membership in PSPACE is obtained
by a reduction to the emptiness checking problem for a new "non-punctual"
subclass of Alternating Timed Automata with multiple clocks called Unilateral
Very Weak Alternating Timed Automata (VWATA) which we prove to be
in PSPACE. We show this by constructing a simulation equivalent
non-deterministic timed automata whose number of clocks is polynomial in the
size of the given VWATA.Comment: Accepted in Concur 202
Mightyl: A compositional translation from mitl to timed automata
Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) was first proposed in the early 1990s as a specification formalism for real-time systems. Apart from its appealing intuitive syntax, there are also theoretical evidences that make MITL a prime real-time counterpart of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). Unfortunately, the tool support for MITL verification is still lacking to this day. In this paper, we propose a new construction from MITL to timed automata via very-weak one-clock alternating timed automata. Our construction subsumes the well-known construction from LTL to Büchi automata by Gastin and Oddoux and yet has the additional benefits of being compositional and integrating easily with existing tools. We implement the construction in our new tool MightyL and report on experiments using Uppaal and LTSmin as back-ends
Real-Time Synthesis is Hard!
We study the reactive synthesis problem (RS) for specifications given in
Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL). RS is known to be undecidable in a very
general setting, but on infinite words only; and only the very restrictive BRRS
subcase is known to be decidable (see D'Souza et al. and Bouyer et al.). In
this paper, we precise the decidability border of MITL synthesis. We show RS is
undecidable on finite words too, and present a landscape of restrictions (both
on the logic and on the possible controllers) that are still undecidable. On
the positive side, we revisit BRRS and introduce an efficient on-the-fly
algorithm to solve it
Model Checking One-clock Priced Timed Automata
We consider the model of priced (a.k.a. weighted) timed automata, an
extension of timed automata with cost information on both locations and
transitions, and we study various model-checking problems for that model based
on extensions of classical temporal logics with cost constraints on modalities.
We prove that, under the assumption that the model has only one clock,
model-checking this class of models against the logic WCTL, CTL with
cost-constrained modalities, is PSPACE-complete (while it has been shown
undecidable as soon as the model has three clocks). We also prove that
model-checking WMTL, LTL with cost-constrained modalities, is decidable only if
there is a single clock in the model and a single stopwatch cost variable
(i.e., whose slopes lie in {0,1}).Comment: 28 page
Timed Automata Approach for Motion Planning Using Metric Interval Temporal Logic
In this paper, we consider the robot motion (or task) planning problem under
some given time bounded high level specifications. We use metric interval
temporal logic (MITL), a member of the temporal logic family, to represent the
task specification and then we provide a constructive way to generate a timed
automaton and methods to look for accepting runs on the automaton to find a
feasible motion (or path) sequence for the robot to complete the task.Comment: Full Version for ECC 201
- …