5,360 research outputs found
Kernels for Below-Upper-Bound Parameterizations of the Hitting Set and Directed Dominating Set Problems
In the {\sc Hitting Set} problem, we are given a collection of
subsets of a ground set and an integer , and asked whether has a
-element subset that intersects each set in . We consider two
parameterizations of {\sc Hitting Set} below tight upper bounds: and
. In both cases is the parameter. We prove that the first
parameterization is fixed-parameter tractable, but has no polynomial kernel
unless coNPNP/poly. The second parameterization is W[1]-complete,
but the introduction of an additional parameter, the degeneracy of the
hypergraph , makes the problem not only fixed-parameter
tractable, but also one with a linear kernel. Here the degeneracy of
is the minimum integer such that for each the
hypergraph with vertex set and edge set containing all edges of
without vertices in , has a vertex of degree at most
In {\sc Nonblocker} ({\sc Directed Nonblocker}), we are given an undirected
graph (a directed graph) on vertices and an integer , and asked
whether has a set of vertices such that for each vertex there is an edge (arc) from a vertex in to . {\sc Nonblocker} can be
viewed as a special case of {\sc Directed Nonblocker} (replace an undirected
graph by a symmetric digraph). Dehne et al. (Proc. SOFSEM 2006) proved that
{\sc Nonblocker} has a linear-order kernel. We obtain a linear-order kernel for
{\sc Directed Nonblocker}
Vertex Disjoint Path in Upward Planar Graphs
The -vertex disjoint paths problem is one of the most studied problems in
algorithmic graph theory. In 1994, Schrijver proved that the problem can be
solved in polynomial time for every fixed when restricted to the class of
planar digraphs and it was a long standing open question whether it is
fixed-parameter tractable (with respect to parameter ) on this restricted
class. Only recently, \cite{CMPP}.\ achieved a major breakthrough and answered
the question positively. Despite the importance of this result (and the
brilliance of their proof), it is of rather theoretical importance. Their proof
technique is both technically extremely involved and also has at least double
exponential parameter dependence. Thus, it seems unrealistic that the algorithm
could actually be implemented. In this paper, therefore, we study a smaller
class of planar digraphs, the class of upward planar digraphs, a well studied
class of planar graphs which can be drawn in a plane such that all edges are
drawn upwards. We show that on the class of upward planar digraphs the problem
(i) remains NP-complete and (ii) the problem is fixed-parameter tractable.
While membership in FPT follows immediately from \cite{CMPP}'s general result,
our algorithm has only single exponential parameter dependency compared to the
double exponential parameter dependence for general planar digraphs.
Furthermore, our algorithm can easily be implemented, in contrast to the
algorithm in \cite{CMPP}.Comment: 14 page
Model counting for CNF formuals of bounded module treewidth.
The modular treewidth of a graph is its treewidth after the contraction of modules. Modular treewidth properly generalizes treewidth and is itself properly generalized by clique-width. We show that the number of satisfying assignments of a CNF formula whose incidence graph has bounded modular treewidth can be computed in polynomial time. This provides new tractable classes of formulas for which #SAT is polynomial. In particular, our result generalizes known results for the treewidth of incidence graphs and is incomparable with known results for clique-width (or rank-width) of signed incidence graphs. The contraction of modules is an effective data reduction procedure. Our algorithm is the first one to harness this technique for #SAT. The order of the polynomial time bound of our algorithm depends on the modular treewidth. We show that this dependency cannot be avoided subject to an assumption from Parameterized Complexity
- β¦