Algebraic recognizability of regular tree languages

We propose a new algebraic framework to discuss and classify recognizable tree languages, and to characterize interesting classes of such languages. Our algebraic tool, called preclones, encompasses the classical notion of syntactic Sigma-algebra or minimal tree automaton, but adds new expressivity to it. The main result in this paper is a variety theorem \`{a} la Eilenberg, but we also discuss important examples of logically defined classes of recognizable tree languages, whose characterization and decidability was established in recent papers (by Benedikt and S\'{e}goufin, and by Bojanczyk and Walukiewicz) and can be naturally formulated in terms of pseudovarieties of preclones. Finally, this paper constitutes the foundation for another paper by the same authors, where first-order definable tree languages receive an algebraic characterization

Algebras for Classifying Regular Tree Languages and an Application to Frontier Testability

Point-tree algebras, a class of equational three-sorted algebras are defined. The elements of sort t of the free point-tree algebra T generated by a set A are identified with finite binary trees with labels in A. A set L of finite binary trees over A is recognized by a point-tree algebr B if there exists a homomorphism h from T in B such that L is an inverse image of h. A tree language is regular if and only if it is recognized by a finite point-tree algebra. There exists a smallest recognizing point-tree algebra for every tree language, the so-called syntactic point-tree algebra. For regular tree languages, this point-tree algebra is computable from a (minimal) recognizing tree automaton. The class of finite point-tree algebras recognizing frontier testable (also known as reverse definite) tree languages is described by means of equations. This gives a cubic algorithm deciding whether a given regular tree language (over a fixed alphabet) is frontier testable. The characterization of the class of frontier testable languages in terms of equations is in contrast with other algebraic approaches to the classification of tree languages (the semigroup and the universal-algebraic approach) where such equations are not possible or not known

Proving that a Tree Language is not First-Order Definable

We explore from an algebraic viewpoint the properties of the tree languages definable with a first-order formula involving the ancestor predicate, using the description of these languages as those recognized by iterated block products of forest algebras defined from finite counter monoids. Proofs of nondefinability are infinite sequences of sets of forests, one for each level of the hierarchy of quantification levels that defines the corresponding variety of languages. The forests at a given level are built recursively by inserting forests from previous level at the ports of a suitable set of multicontexts. We show that a recursive proof exists for the syntactic algebra of every non-definable language. We also investigate certain types of uniform recursive proofs. For this purpose, we define from a forest algebra an algebra of mappings and an extended algebra, which we also use to redefine the notion of aperiodicity in a way that generalizes the existing ones