Advanced Automata Minimization

We present an efficient algorithm to reduce the size of nondeterministic Buchi word automata, while retaining their language. Additionally, we describe methods to solve PSPACE-complete automata problems like universality, equivalence and inclusion for much larger instances (1-3 orders of magnitude) than before. This can be used to scale up applications of automata in formal verification tools and decision procedures for logical theories. The algorithm is based on new transition pruning techniques. These use criteria based on combinations of backward and forward trace inclusions. Since these relations are themselves PSPACE-complete, we describe methods to compute good approximations of them in polynomial time. Extensive experiments show that the average-case complexity of our algorithm scales quadratically. The size reduction of the automata depends very much on the class of instances, but our algorithm consistently outperforms all previous techniques by a wide margin. We tested our algorithm on Buchi automata derived from LTL-formulae, many classes of random automata and automata derived from mutual exclusion protocols, and compared its performance to the well-known automata tool GOAL.Comment: 15 page

Buffered Simulation Games for B\"uchi Automata

Simulation relations are an important tool in automata theory because they provide efficiently computable approximations to language inclusion. In recent years, extensions of ordinary simulations have been studied, for instance multi-pebble and multi-letter simulations which yield better approximations and are still polynomial-time computable. In this paper we study the limitations of approximating language inclusion in this way: we introduce a natural extension of multi-letter simulations called buffered simulations. They are based on a simulation game in which the two players share a FIFO buffer of unbounded size. We consider two variants of these buffered games called continuous and look-ahead simulation which differ in how elements can be removed from the FIFO buffer. We show that look-ahead simulation, the simpler one, is already PSPACE-hard, i.e. computationally as hard as language inclusion itself. Continuous simulation is even EXPTIME-hard. We also provide matching upper bounds for solving these games with infinite state spaces.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527

State Space Reduction For Parity Automata

Exact minimization of ?-automata is a difficult problem and heuristic algorithms are a subject of current research. We propose several new approaches to reduce the state space of deterministic parity automata. These are based on extracting information from structures within the automaton, such as strongly connected components, coloring of the states, and equivalence classes of given relations, to determine states that can safely be merged. We also establish a framework to generalize the notion of quotient automata and uniformly describe such algorithms. The description of these procedures consists of a theoretical analysis as well as data collected from experiments

Reducing Nondeterministic Tree Automata by Adding Transitions

We introduce saturation of nondeterministic tree automata, a technique that consists of adding new transitions to an automaton while preserving its language. We implemented our algorithm on minotaut - a module of the tree automata library libvata that reduces the size of automata by merging states and removing superfluous transitions - and we show how saturation can make subsequent merge and transition-removal operations more effective. Thus we obtain a Ptime algorithm that reduces the size of tree automata even more than before. Additionally, we explore how minotaut alone can play an important role when performing hard operations like complementation, allowing to both obtain smaller complement automata and lower computation times. We then show how saturation can extend this contribution even further. We tested our algorithms on a large collection of automata from applications of libvata in shape analysis, and on different classes of randomly generated automata.Comment: In Proceedings MEMICS 2016, arXiv:1612.0403

Incremental Dead State Detection in Logarithmic Time

Identifying live and dead states in an abstract transition system is a recurring problem in formal verification; for example, it arises in our recent work on efficiently deciding regex constraints in SMT. However, state-of-the-art graph algorithms for maintaining reachability information incrementally (that is, as states are visited and before the entire state space is explored) assume that new edges can be added from any state at any time, whereas in many applications, outgoing edges are added from each state as it is explored. To formalize the latter situation, we propose guided incremental digraphs (GIDs), incremental graphs which support labeling closed states (states which will not receive further outgoing edges). Our main result is that dead state detection in GIDs is solvable in $O(\log m)$ amortized time per edge for $m$ edges, improving upon $O(\sqrt{m})$ per edge due to Bender, Fineman, Gilbert, and Tarjan (BFGT) for general incremental directed graphs. We introduce two algorithms for GIDs: one establishing the logarithmic time bound, and a second algorithm to explore a lazy heuristics-based approach. To enable an apples-to-apples experimental comparison, we implemented both algorithms, two simpler baselines, and the state-of-the-art BFGT baseline using a common directed graph interface in Rust. Our evaluation shows $110$-$530$x speedups over BFGT for the largest input graphs over a range of graph classes, random graphs, and graphs arising from regex benchmarks.Comment: 22 pages + reference