Network Access Control: Disruptive Technology?

Network Access Control (NAC) implements policy-based access control to the trusted network. It regulates entry to the network by the use of health verifiers and policy control points to mitigate the introduction of malicious software. However the current versions of NAC may not be the universal remedy to endpoint security that many vendors tout. Many organizations that are evaluating the technology, but that have not yet deployed a solution, believe that NAC presents an opportunity for severe disruption of their networks. A cursory examination of the technologies used and how they are deployed in the network appears to support this argument. The addition of NAC components can make the network architecture even more complex and subject to failure. However, one recent survey of organizations that have deployed a NAC solution indicates that the \u27common wisdom\u27 about NAC may not be correct

ACUTA Journal of Telecommunications in Higher Education

In This Issue UConn Looks at Little Details for Big Savings A Framework for Managing Best Practices Auditing, Honesty, and Big Savings Leveraging SIP within Existing Networks: Reflecting on the University Network Merging Faces of Telecom Service Providers How Three Schools Make Profitable Use of the Web Developing Accounting and Planning Systems to Control Network Costs lnstitutional Excellence Award: The Advanced Network Services Registry at KU Are You Ready for Best Practices? Interview President\u27s Message From the Executive Directo

Campus Communications Systems: Converging Technologies

This book is a rewrite of Campus Telecommunications Systems: Managing Change, a book that was written by ACUTA in 1995. In the past decade, our industry has experienced a thousand-fold increase in data rates as we migrated from 10 megabit links (10 million bits per second) to 10 gigabit links (10 billion bits per second), we have seen the National Telecommunications Policy completely revamped; we have seen the combination of voice, data, and video onto one network; and we have seen many of our service providers merge into larger corporations able to offer more diverse services. When this book was last written, A CUT A meant telecommunications, convergence was a mathematical term, triple play was a baseball term, and terms such as iPod, DoS, and QoS did not exist. This book is designed to be a communications primer to be used by new entrants into the field of communications in higher education and by veteran communications professionals who want additional information in areas other than their field of expertise. There are reference books and text books available on every topic discussed in this book if a more in-depth explanation is desired. Individual chapters were authored by communications professionals from various member campuses. This allowed the authors to share their years of experience (more years than many of us would care to admit to) with the community at large. Foreword Walt Magnussen, Ph.D. Preface Ron Kovac, Ph.D. 1 The Technology Landscape: Historical Overview . Walt Magnussen, Ph.D. 2 Emerging Trends and Technologies . Joanne Kossuth 3 Network Security . Beth Chancellor 4 Security and Disaster Planning and Management Marjorie Windelberg, Ph.D. 5 Student Services in a University Setting . Walt Magnussen, Ph.D. 6 Administrative Services David E. O\u27Neill 7 The Business Side of Information Technology George Denbow 8 The Role of Consultants . David C. Metz Glossary Michelle Narcavag

ACUTA Journal of Telecommunications in Higher Education

In This Issue Technology Advances: The View from 10,000 Feet WAP: Are You Ready for a Wireless World? Virtual Private Networks: How They Can Work for Colleges and Universities Network Security: How\u27s Your Posture? Software for Rent: Contact ASP Voicing My IPinion Institutional Excellence Award: Colorado Christian University Columns Interview Book Revie

Syringa Networks v. Idaho Department of Administration Clerk\u27s Record v. 1 Dckt. 38735

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/1519/thumbnail.jp

ACUTA Journal of Telecommunications in Higher Education

In This Issue CRM Solutions Let Clients Help Themselves It\u27s a Win-Win for MoBull Messenger Assistive Technologies Meet Students\u27Needs Autoattendant: Boon or Bane? Hot Spots: A Hot New ldea for Serving Customers and Generating Revenue? lnstitutional Excellence Award: Bridgewater State College A Primer on Optical Networking The Right Way to Make a Name for Yourself Interview Column

Proposed standards and best practices for technological infrastructure at contact centers in the Dominican Republic

The Contact Center industry in the Dominican Republic has experienced a considerable and fast growth in the last years. The main focus of this industry has been offering services to companies located outside the country. One notorious problem is the lack of written documentation in regards to general requirements needed to set up a Contact Center in the territory. The objective of this research is the presentation of a set of proposed standards and best practices for requirements of Technological Infrastructure for Contact Centers located in the Dominican Republic. These standards and best practices have been developed considering the needs identified within a Contact Center domain model, which was developed for this project. Other factors that were taken into consideration are the technological requirements for the operations of the Contact Center, the reasons why clients outsource their services and the technological challenges faced by Dominican Contact Centers that influence operations from a technological point of view

IP and ATM integration: A New paradigm in multi-service internetworking

ATM is a widespread technology adopted by many to support advanced data communication, in particular efficient Internet services provision. The expected challenges of multimedia communication together with the increasing massive utilization of IP-based applications urgently require redesign of networking solutions in terms of both new functionalities and enhanced performance. However, the networking context is affected by so many changes, and to some extent chaotic growth, that any approach based on a structured and complex top-down architecture is unlikely to be applicable. Instead, an approach based on finding out the best match between realistic service requirements and the pragmatic, intelligent use of technical opportunities made available by the product market seems more appropriate. By following this approach, innovations and improvements can be introduced at different times, not necessarily complying with each other according to a coherent overall design. With the aim of pursuing feasible innovations in the different networking aspects, we look at both IP and ATM internetworking in order to investigating a few of the most crucial topics/ issues related to the IP and ATM integration perspective. This research would also address various means of internetworking the Internet Protocol (IP) and Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) with an objective of identifying the best possible means of delivering Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for multi-service applications, exploiting the meritorious features that IP and ATM have to offer. Although IP and ATM often have been viewed as competitors, their complementary strengths and limitations from a natural alliance that combines the best aspects of both the technologies. For instance, one limitation of ATM networks has been the relatively large gap between the speed of the network paths and the control operations needed to configure those data paths to meet changing user needs. IP\u27s greatest strength, on the other hand, is the inherent flexibility and its capacity to adapt rapidly to changing conditions. These complementary strengths and limitations make it natural to combine IP with ATM to obtain the best that each has to offer. Over time many models and architectures have evolved for IP/ATM internetworking and they have impacted the fundamental thinking in internetworking IP and ATM. These technologies, architectures, models and implementations will be reviewed in greater detail in addressing possible issues in integrating these architectures s in a multi-service, enterprise network. The objective being to make recommendations as to the best means of interworking the two in exploiting the salient features of one another to provide a faster, reliable, scalable, robust, QoS aware network in the most economical manner. How IP will be carried over ATM when a commercial worldwide ATM network is deployed is not addressed and the details of such a network still remain in a state of flux to specify anything concrete. Our research findings culminated with a strong recommendation that the best model to adopt, in light of the impending integrated service requirements of future multi-service environments, is an ATM core with IP at the edges to realize the best of both technologies in delivering QoS guarantees in a seamless manner to any node in the enterprise

Revenue recognition, January 1, 2019; Audit and Accounting Guide

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_indev/2422/thumbnail.jp

Quality Of Service Enhancement In Ip Based Networks Using Diffserv

Tez (Yüksek Lisans) -- İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2003Thesis (M.Sc.) -- İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2003Bu çalışmada, Diffserv mimarisi ile internet üzerinde servis kalitesi sağlama tartışılmıştır. Son on yılda IP tabanlı internette servis kalitesi sağlanamıyordu. İnternette bugün sağlanabilen tek servis ‘Best Effort (BE)’ adı verilen servistir. Yani, ağ, herhangi bir paketi hedefine ulaştırırken mümkün olan en verimli yolu kullanır ancak herhangi bir garanti ya da kaynak ayırımı yapmaz. Başka bir deyişle, trafik mümkün olduğu kadar hızlı ve herhangi bir zaman sınırı ya da miktar açısından garanti verilmeden işlenir. İnternetin ticari bir yapıya bürünmesiyle ‘Servis Kalitesi’ sağlanma ihtiyacı daha da artmıştır. Bu ihtiyaç farklı mimarilerin doğmasına yol açmıştır: IntServ ve DiffServ olmak üzere.Tez çalışmasında DiffServ mimarisi problem ve avantajlarıyla ele alınmıştır. Son bölümde ise NS2 ağ simulasyon yazılımı kullanılarak DiffServ implementasyonları yapılmış sonuçları karşılaştırmalı olarak verilmiştir.In this study improving Quality of Service (QoS) on the Internet with DiffServ architecture is discussed. Within the past decade, it is certainly not support for Quality of Service (QoS) over the IP-based ubiquitous Internet. The Internet as it stands today only support one service class called -Best-Effort (BE) Service. The network would make an earnest attempt to deliver packets to their destinations but with no guarantees and/or special resources allocated for any of the packets. With another words, traffic is processed as quickly as possible but there is no guarantee as to timeliness or actual delivery or even how much can be delivered (i.e. throughput). With the rapid transformation of the Internet into a commercial infrastructure, demands for Quality of Service (QoS) have rapidly developed. This need was resulted to different architectures: IntServ and DiffServ. In the study some DiffServ implementations are discussed with their problems and gains. At the last section with using NS2 simulation programming language some DiffServ implementations are given with the compared results.Yüksek LisansM.Sc