Exploiting iteration-level parallelism in dataflow programs

The term "dataflow" generally encompasses three distinct aspects of computation - a data-driven model of computation, a functional/declarative programming language, and a special-purpose multiprocessor architecture. In this paper we decouple the language and architecture issues by demonstrating that declarative programming is a suitable vehicle for the programming of conventional distributed-memory multiprocessors.This is achieved by appling several transformations to the compiled declarative program to achieve iteration-level (rather than instruction-level) parallelism. The transformations first group individual instructions into sequential light-weight processes, and then insert primitives to: (1) cause array allocation to be distributed over multiple processors, (2) cause computation to follow the data distribution by inserting an index filtering mechanism into a given loop and spawning a copy of it on all PEs; the filter causes each instance of that loop to operate on a different subrange of the index variable.The underlying model of computation is a dataflow/von Neumann hybrid in that exection within a process is control-driven while the creation, blocking, and activation of processes is data-driven.The performance of this process-oriented dataflow system (PODS) is demonstrated using the hydrodynamics simulation benchmark called SIMPLE, where a 19-fold speedup on a 32-processor architecture has been achieved

Accelerating Pattern Recognition Algorithms On Parallel Computing Architectures

The move to more parallel computing architectures places more responsibility on the programmer to achieve greater performance. The programmer must now have a greater understanding of the underlying architecture and the inherent algorithmic parallelism. Using parallel computing architectures for exploiting algorithmic parallelism can be a complex task. This dissertation demonstrates various techniques for using parallel computing architectures to exploit algorithmic parallelism. Specifically, three pattern recognition (PR) approaches are examined for acceleration across multiple parallel computing architectures, namely field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and general purpose graphical processing units (GPGPUs). Phase-only filter correlation for fingerprint identification was studied as the first PR approach. This approach\u27s sensitivity to angular rotations, scaling, and missing data was surveyed. Additionally, a novel FPGA implementation of this algorithm was created using fixed point computations, deep pipelining, and four computation phases. Communication and computation were overlapped to efficiently process large fingerprint galleries. The FPGA implementation showed approximately a 47 times speedup over a central processing unit (CPU) implementation with negligible impact on precision. For the second PR approach, a spiking neural network (SNN) algorithm for a character recognition application was examined. A novel FPGA implementation of the approach was developed incorporating a scalable modular SNN processing element (PE) to efficiently perform neural computations. The modular SNN PE incorporated streaming memory, fixed point computation, and deep pipelining. This design showed speedups of approximately 3.3 and 8.5 times over CPU implementations for 624 and 9,264 sized neural networks, respectively. Results indicate that the PE design could scale to process larger sized networks easily. Finally for the third PR approach, cellular simultaneous recurrent networks (CSRNs) were investigated for GPGPU acceleration. Particularly, the applications of maze traversal and face recognition were studied. Novel GPGPU implementations were developed employing varying quantities of task-level, data-level, and instruction-level parallelism to achieve efficient runtime performance. Furthermore, the performance of the face recognition application was examined across a heterogeneous cluster of multi-core and GPGPU architectures. A combination of multi-core processors and GPGPUs achieved roughly a 996 times speedup over a single-core CPU implementation. From examining these PR approaches for acceleration, this dissertation presents useful techniques and insight applicable to other algorithms to improve performance when designing a parallel implementation

Highly parallel HEVC decoding for heterogeneous systems with CPU and GPU

The High Efficiency Video Coding HEVC standard provides a higher compression efficiency than other video coding standards but at the cost of an increased computational load, which makes hard to achieve real-time encoding/decoding for ultra high-resolution and high-quality video sequences. Graphics Processing Units GPU are known to provide massive processing capability for highly parallel and regular computing kernels, but not all HEVC decoding procedures are suited for GPU execution. Furthermore, if HEVC decoding is accelerated by GPUs, energy efficiency is another concern for heterogeneous CPU+GPU decoding. In this paper, a highly parallel HEVC decoder for heterogeneous CPU+GPU system is proposed. It exploits available parallelism in HEVC decoding on the CPU, GPU, and between the CPU and GPU devices simultaneously. On top of that, different workload balancing schemes can be selected according to the devoted CPU and GPU computing resources. Furthermore, an energy optimized solution is proposed by tuning GPU clock rates. Results show that the proposed decoder achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art CPU decoder, and the best performance among the workload balancing schemes depends on the available CPU and GPU computing resources. In particular, with an NVIDIA Titan X Maxwell GPU and an Intel Xeon E5-2699v3 CPU, the proposed decoder delivers 167 frames per second (fps) for Ultra HD 4K videos, when four CPU cores are used. Compared to the state-of-the-art CPU decoder using four CPU cores, the proposed decoder gains a speedup factor of . When decoding performance is bounded by the CPU, a system wise energy reduction up to 36% is achieved by using fixed (and lower) GPU clocks, compared to the default dynamic clock settings on the GPU.EC/H2020/688759/EU/Low-Power Parallel Computing on GPUs 2/LPGPU