562 research outputs found
Abstraction and Acceleration in SMT-based Model-Checking for Array Programs
Abstraction (in its various forms) is a powerful established technique in
model-checking; still, when unbounded data-structures are concerned, it cannot
always cope with divergence phenomena in a satisfactory way. Acceleration is an
approach which is widely used to avoid divergence, but it has been applied
mostly to integer programs. This paper addresses the problem of accelerating
transition relations for unbounded arrays with the ultimate goal of avoiding
divergence during reachability analysis of abstract programs. For this, we
first design a format to compute accelerations in this domain; then we show how
to adapt the so-called 'monotonic abstraction' technique to efficiently handle
complex formulas with nested quantifiers generated by the acceleration
preprocessing. Notably, our technique can be easily plugged-in into
abstraction/refinement loops, and strongly contributes to avoid divergence:
experiments conducted with the MCMT model checker attest the effectiveness of
our approach on programs with unbounded arrays, where acceleration and
abstraction/refinement technologies fail if applied alone.Comment: Published in the proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on
Frontiers of Combining Systems (FroCoS) with the title "Definability of
Accelerated Relations in a Theory of Arrays and its Applications" (available
at http://www.springerlink.com
An SMT-based verification framework for software systems handling arrays
Recent advances in the areas of automated reasoning and first-order theorem proving paved the way to the developing of effective tools for the rigorous formal analysis of computer systems. Nowadays many formal verification frameworks are built over highly engineered tools (SMT-solvers) implementing decision procedures for quantifier- free fragments of theories of interest for (dis)proving properties of software or hardware products. The goal of this thesis is to go beyond the quantifier-free case and enable sound and effective solutions for the analysis of software systems requiring the usage of quantifiers. This is the case, for example, of software systems handling array variables, since meaningful properties about arrays (e.g., "the array is sorted") can be expressed only by exploiting quantification. The first contribution of this thesis is the definition of a new Lazy Abstraction with Interpolants framework in which arrays can be handled in a natural manner. We identify a fragment of the theory of arrays admitting quantifier-free interpolation and provide an effective quantifier-free interpolation algorithm. The combination of this result with an important preprocessing technique allows the generation of the required quantified formulae. Second, we prove that accelerations, i.e., transitive closures, of an interesting class of relations over arrays are definable in the theory of arrays via Exists-Forall-first order formulae. We further show that the theoretical importance of this result has a practical relevance: Once the (problematic) nested quantifiers are suitably handled, acceleration offers a precise (not over-approximated) alternative to abstraction solutions. Third, we present new decision procedures for quantified fragments of the theories of arrays. Our decision procedures are fully declarative, parametric in the theories describing the structure of the indexes and the elements of the arrays and orthogonal with respect to known results. Fourth, by leveraging our new results on acceleration and decision procedures, we show that the problem of checking the safety of an important class of programs with arrays is fully decidable. The thesis presents along with theoretical results practical engineering strategies for the effective implementation of a framework combining the aforementioned results: The declarative nature of our contributions allows for the definition of an integrated framework able to effectively check the safety of programs handling array variables while overcoming the individual limitations of the presented techniques
Monotonic Abstraction Techniques: from Parametric to Software Model Checking
Monotonic abstraction is a technique introduced in model checking
parameterized distributed systems in order to cope with transitions containing
global conditions within guards. The technique has been re-interpreted in a
declarative setting in previous papers of ours and applied to the verification
of fault tolerant systems under the so-called "stopping failures" model. The
declarative reinterpretation consists in logical techniques (quantifier
relativizations and, especially, quantifier instantiations) making sense in a
broader context. In fact, we recently showed that such techniques can
over-approximate array accelerations, so that they can be employed as a
meaningful (and practically effective) component of CEGAR loops in software
model checking too.Comment: In Proceedings MOD* 2014, arXiv:1411.345
Proving Safety with Trace Automata and Bounded Model Checking
Loop under-approximation is a technique that enriches C programs with
additional branches that represent the effect of a (limited) range of loop
iterations. While this technique can speed up the detection of bugs
significantly, it introduces redundant execution traces which may complicate
the verification of the program. This holds particularly true for verification
tools based on Bounded Model Checking, which incorporate simplistic heuristics
to determine whether all feasible iterations of a loop have been considered.
We present a technique that uses \emph{trace automata} to eliminate redundant
executions after performing loop acceleration. The method reduces the diameter
of the program under analysis, which is in certain cases sufficient to allow a
safety proof using Bounded Model Checking. Our transformation is precise---it
does not introduce false positives, nor does it mask any errors. We have
implemented the analysis as a source-to-source transformation, and present
experimental results showing the applicability of the technique
Backward Reachability of Array-based Systems by SMT solving: Termination and Invariant Synthesis
The safety of infinite state systems can be checked by a backward
reachability procedure. For certain classes of systems, it is possible to prove
the termination of the procedure and hence conclude the decidability of the
safety problem. Although backward reachability is property-directed, it can
unnecessarily explore (large) portions of the state space of a system which are
not required to verify the safety property under consideration. To avoid this,
invariants can be used to dramatically prune the search space. Indeed, the
problem is to guess such appropriate invariants. In this paper, we present a
fully declarative and symbolic approach to the mechanization of backward
reachability of infinite state systems manipulating arrays by Satisfiability
Modulo Theories solving. Theories are used to specify the topology and the data
manipulated by the system. We identify sufficient conditions on the theories to
ensure the termination of backward reachability and we show the completeness of
a method for invariant synthesis (obtained as the dual of backward
reachability), again, under suitable hypotheses on the theories. We also
present a pragmatic approach to interleave invariant synthesis and backward
reachability so that a fix-point for the set of backward reachable states is
more easily obtained. Finally, we discuss heuristics that allow us to derive an
implementation of the techniques in the model checker MCMT, showing remarkable
speed-ups on a significant set of safety problems extracted from a variety of
sources.Comment: Accepted for publication in Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
A simple abstraction of arrays and maps by program translation
We present an approach for the static analysis of programs handling arrays,
with a Galois connection between the semantics of the array program and
semantics of purely scalar operations. The simplest way to implement it is by
automatic, syntactic transformation of the array program into a scalar program
followed analysis of the scalar program with any static analysis technique
(abstract interpretation, acceleration, predicate abstraction,.. .). The
scalars invariants thus obtained are translated back onto the original program
as universally quantified array invariants. We illustrate our approach on a
variety of examples, leading to the " Dutch flag " algorithm
Polyhedra to the rescue of array interpolants
International audienceWe propose a new approach to the automated verification of the correctness of programs handling arrays. An abstract interpreter supplies auxiliary numeric invariants to an interpolation-based refinement procedure suited to array programs. Experiments show that this combination approach, implemented in an enhanced version of the Booster software model-checker, performs better than the pure interpolation-based approach, at no additional cost
Test generation for high coverage with abstraction refinement and coarsening (ARC)
Testing is the main approach used in the software industry to expose failures. Producing thorough test suites is an expensive and error prone task that can greatly benefit from automation. Two challenging problems in test automation are generating test input and evaluating the adequacy of test suites: the first amounts to producing a set of test cases that accurately represent the software behavior, the second requires defining appropriate metrics to evaluate the thoroughness of the testing activities. Structural testing addresses these problems by measuring the amount of code elements that are executed by a test suite. The code elements that are not covered by any execution are natural candidates for generating further test cases, and the measured coverage rate can be used to estimate the thoroughness of the test suite. Several empirical studies show that test suites achieving high coverage rates exhibit a high failure detection ability. However, producing highly covering test suites automatically is hard as certain code elements are executed only under complex conditions while other might be not reachable at all. In this thesis we propose Abstraction Refinement and Coarsening (ARC), a goal oriented technique that combines static and dynamic software analysis to automatically generate test suites with high code coverage. At the core of our approach there is an abstract program model that enables the synergistic application of the different analysis components. In ARC we integrate Dynamic Symbolic Execution (DSE) and abstraction refinement to precisely direct test generation towards the coverage goals and detect infeasible elements. ARC includes a novel coarsening algorithm for improved scalability. We implemented ARC-B, a prototype tool that analyses C programs and produces test suites that achieve high branch coverage. Our experiments show that the approach effectively exploits the synergy between symbolic testing and reachability analysis outperforming state of the art test generation approaches. We evaluated ARC-B on industry relevant software, and exposed previously unknown failures in a safety-critical software component
What's Decidable About Sequences?
We present a first-order theory of sequences with integer elements,
Presburger arithmetic, and regular constraints, which can model significant
properties of data structures such as arrays and lists. We give a decision
procedure for the quantifier-free fragment, based on an encoding into the
first-order theory of concatenation; the procedure has PSPACE complexity. The
quantifier-free fragment of the theory of sequences can express properties such
as sortedness and injectivity, as well as Boolean combinations of periodic and
arithmetic facts relating the elements of the sequence and their positions
(e.g., "for all even i's, the element at position i has value i+3 or 2i"). The
resulting expressive power is orthogonal to that of the most expressive
decidable logics for arrays. Some examples demonstrate that the fragment is
also suitable to reason about sequence-manipulating programs within the
standard framework of axiomatic semantics.Comment: Fixed a few lapses in the Mergesort exampl
- …