755 research outputs found
Probabilistic Maneuver Recognition in Traffic Scenarios
In this work an approach is presented to model and recognize traffic maneuvers in terms of interactions between different traffic participants on extra urban roads. Results of the recognition concept are presented and evaluated using different sensor setups and its benefit is outlined by an integration into a software framework in the field of Car-to-Car (C2C) communications. Furthermore, recognition results are used in this work to robustly predict vehicle’s trajectories while driving dynami
Enhanced Position Verification for VANETs using Subjective Logic
The integrity of messages in vehicular ad-hoc networks has been extensively
studied by the research community, resulting in the IEEE~1609.2 standard, which
provides typical integrity guarantees. However, the correctness of message
contents is still one of the main challenges of applying dependable and secure
vehicular ad-hoc networks. One important use case is the validity of position
information contained in messages: position verification mechanisms have been
proposed in the literature to provide this functionality. A more general
approach to validate such information is by applying misbehavior detection
mechanisms. In this paper, we consider misbehavior detection by enhancing two
position verification mechanisms and fusing their results in a generalized
framework using subjective logic. We conduct extensive simulations using VEINS
to study the impact of traffic density, as well as several types of attackers
and fractions of attackers on our mechanisms. The obtained results show the
proposed framework can validate position information as effectively as existing
approaches in the literature, without tailoring the framework specifically for
this use case.Comment: 7 pages, 18 figures, corrected version of a paper submitted to 2016
IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2016-Fall): revised the way an
opinion is created with eART, and re-did the experiments (uploaded here as
correction in agreement with TPC Chairs
Reachability-Based Confidence-Aware Probabilistic Collision Detection in Highway Driving
Risk assessment is a crucial component of collision warning and avoidance
systems in intelligent vehicles. To accurately detect potential vehicle
collisions, reachability-based formal approaches have been developed to ensure
driving safety, but suffer from over-conservatism, potentially leading to
false-positive risk events in complicated real-world applications. In this
work, we combine two reachability analysis techniques, i.e., backward reachable
set (BRS) and stochastic forward reachable set (FRS), and propose an integrated
probabilistic collision detection framework in highway driving. Within the
framework, we can firstly use a BRS to formally check whether a two-vehicle
interaction is safe; otherwise, a prediction-based stochastic FRS is employed
to estimate a collision probability at each future time step. In doing so, the
framework can not only identify non-risky events with guaranteed safety, but
also provide accurate collision risk estimation in safety-critical events. To
construct the stochastic FRS, we develop a neural network-based acceleration
model for surrounding vehicles, and further incorporate confidence-aware
dynamic belief to improve the prediction accuracy. Extensive experiments are
conducted to validate the performance of the acceleration prediction model
based on naturalistic highway driving data, and the efficiency and
effectiveness of the framework with the infused confidence belief are tested
both in naturalistic and simulated highway scenarios. The proposed risk
assessment framework is promising in real-world applications.Comment: Under review at Engineering. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:2205.0135
Situational Awareness Enhancement for Connected and Automated Vehicle Systems
Recent developments in the area of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) have boosted the interest in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs). While ITS is intended to resolve and mitigate serious traffic issues such as passenger and pedestrian fatalities, accidents, and traffic congestion; these goals are only achievable by vehicles that are fully aware of their situation and surroundings in real-time. Therefore, connected and automated vehicle systems heavily rely on communication technologies to create a real-time map of their surrounding environment and extend their range of situational awareness. In this dissertation, we propose novel approaches to enhance situational awareness, its applications, and effective sharing of information among vehicles.;The communication technology for CAVs is known as vehicle-to-everything (V2x) communication, in which vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) have been targeted for the first round of deployment based on dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) devices for vehicles and road-side transportation infrastructures. Wireless communication among these entities creates self-organizing networks, known as Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs). Due to the mobile, rapidly changing, and intrinsically error-prone nature of VANETs, traditional network architectures are generally unsatisfactory to address VANETs fundamental performance requirements. Therefore, we first investigate imperfections of the vehicular communication channel and propose a new modeling scheme for large-scale and small-scale components of the communication channel in dense vehicular networks. Subsequently, we introduce an innovative method for a joint modeling of the situational awareness and networking components of CAVs in a single framework. Based on these two models, we propose a novel network-aware broadcast protocol for fast broadcasting of information over multiple hops to extend the range of situational awareness. Afterward, motivated by the most common and injury-prone pedestrian crash scenarios, we extend our work by proposing an end-to-end Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) framework to provide situational awareness and hazard detection for vulnerable road users. Finally, as humans are the most spontaneous and influential entity for transportation systems, we design a learning-based driver behavior model and integrate it into our situational awareness component. Consequently, higher accuracy of situational awareness and overall system performance are achieved by exchange of more useful information
Emerging research directions in computer science : contributions from the young informatics faculty in Karlsruhe
In order to build better human-friendly human-computer interfaces,
such interfaces need to be enabled with capabilities to perceive
the user, his location, identity, activities and in particular his interaction
with others and the machine. Only with these perception capabilities
can smart systems ( for example human-friendly robots or smart environments) become posssible. In my research I\u27m thus focusing on the
development of novel techniques for the visual perception of humans and
their activities, in order to facilitate perceptive multimodal interfaces,
humanoid robots and smart environments. My work includes research
on person tracking, person identication, recognition of pointing gestures,
estimation of head orientation and focus of attention, as well as
audio-visual scene and activity analysis. Application areas are humanfriendly
humanoid robots, smart environments, content-based image and
video analysis, as well as safety- and security-related applications. This
article gives a brief overview of my ongoing research activities in these
areas
SOTIF Entropy: Online SOTIF Risk Quantification and Mitigation for Autonomous Driving
Autonomous driving confronts great challenges in complex traffic scenarios,
where the risk of Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) can be triggered
by the dynamic operational environment and system insufficiencies. The SOTIF
risk is reflected not only intuitively in the collision risk with objects
outside the autonomous vehicles (AVs), but also inherently in the performance
limitation risk of the implemented algorithms themselves. How to minimize the
SOTIF risk for autonomous driving is currently a critical, difficult, and
unresolved issue. Therefore, this paper proposes the "Self-Surveillance and
Self-Adaption System" as a systematic approach to online minimize the SOTIF
risk, which aims to provide a systematic solution for monitoring,
quantification, and mitigation of inherent and external risks. The core of this
system is the risk monitoring of the implemented artificial intelligence
algorithms within the AV. As a demonstration of the Self-Surveillance and
Self-Adaption System, the risk monitoring of the perception algorithm, i.e.,
YOLOv5 is highlighted. Moreover, the inherent perception algorithm risk and
external collision risk are jointly quantified via SOTIF entropy, which is then
propagated downstream to the decision-making module and mitigated. Finally,
several challenging scenarios are demonstrated, and the Hardware-in-the-Loop
experiments are conducted to verify the efficiency and effectiveness of the
system. The results demonstrate that the Self-Surveillance and Self-Adaption
System enables dependable online monitoring, quantification, and mitigation of
SOTIF risk in real-time critical traffic environments.Comment: 16 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables, submitted to IEEE TIT
The Application of Driver Models in the Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey
Driver models play a vital role in developing and verifying autonomous
vehicles (AVs). Previously, they are mainly applied in traffic flow simulation
to model realistic driver behavior. With the development of AVs, driver models
attract much attention again due to their potential contributions to AV
certification. The simulation-based testing method is considered an effective
measure to accelerate AV testing due to its safe and efficient characteristics.
Nonetheless, realistic driver models are prerequisites for valid simulation
results. Additionally, an AV is assumed to be at least as safe as a careful and
competent driver. Therefore, driver models are inevitable for AV safety
assessment. However, no comparison or discussion of driver models is available
regarding their utility to AVs in the last five years despite their necessities
in the release of AVs. This motivates us to present a comprehensive survey of
driver models in the paper and compare their applicability. Requirements for
driver models in terms of their application to AV safety assessment are
discussed. A summary of driver models for simulation-based testing and AV
certification is provided. Evaluation metrics are defined to compare their
strength and weakness. Finally, an architecture for a careful and competent
driver model is proposed. Challenges and future work are elaborated. This study
gives related researchers especially regulators an overview and helps them to
define appropriate driver models for AVs
λμ¬ κ΅μ°¨λ‘μμμ μμ¨μ£Όνμ μν μ£Όλ³ μ°¨λ κ²½λ‘ μμΈ‘ λ° κ±°λ κ³ν μκ³ λ¦¬μ¦
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :곡과λν κΈ°κ³ν곡곡νλΆ,2020. 2. μ΄κ²½μ.μ°¨λμ© μΌμ± λ° μ²λ¦¬κΈ°μ μ΄ λ°λ¬ν¨μ λ°λΌ μλμ°¨ κΈ°μ μ°κ΅¬κ° μλ μμ κΈ°μ μμ λ₯λ μμ κΈ°μ λ‘ μ΄μ μ΄ νμ₯λκ³ μλ€. μ΅κ·Ό, μ£Όμ μλμ°¨ μ μμ¬λ€μ λ₯λν μ°¨κ°κ±°λ¦¬ μ μ΄, μ°¨μ μ μ§ λ³΄μ‘°, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κΈ΄κΈ μλ μ λκ³Ό κ°μ λ₯λ μμ κΈ°μ μ΄ μ΄λ―Έ μμ
ννκ³ μλ€. μ΄λ¬ν κΈ°μ μ μ§λ³΄λ μ¬μλ₯ μ λ‘λ₯Ό λ¬μ±νκΈ° μνμ¬ κΈ°μ μ°κ΅¬ λΆμΌλ₯Ό λ₯λ μμ κΈ°μ μ λμ΄μ μμ¨μ£Όν μμ€ν
μΌλ‘ νμ₯μν€κ³ μλ€. νΉν, λμ¬ λλ‘λ μΈλ, μ¬κ°μ§λ, μ£Όμ°¨μ°¨λ, μ΄λ₯μ°¨, 보νμ λ±κ³Ό κ°μ κ΅ν΅ μν μμλ₯Ό λ§μ΄ κ°κ³ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ κ³ μλλ‘λ³΄λ€ μ¬κ³ λ°μλ₯ κ³Ό μ¬μλ₯ μ΄ λμΌλ©°, μ΄λ λμ¬ λλ‘μμμ μμ¨μ£Όνμ ν΅μ¬ μ΄μκ° λκ³ μλ€. λ§μ νλ‘μ νΈλ€μ΄ μμ¨μ£Όνμ νκ²½μ , μΈκ΅¬νμ , μ¬νμ , κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κ²½μ μ μΈ‘λ©΄μμμ μμ¨μ£Όνμ ν¨κ³Όλ₯Ό νκ°νκΈ° μν΄ μνλμκ±°λ μν μ€μ μλ€. μλ₯Ό λ€μ΄, μ λ½μ AdaptIVEλ λ€μν μμ¨μ£Όν κΈ°λ₯μ κ°λ°νμμΌλ©°, ꡬ체μ μΈ νκ° λ°©λ²λ‘ μ κ°λ°νμλ€. λν, CityMobil2λ μ λ½ μ μμ 9κ°μ λ€λ₯Έ νκ²½μμ λ¬΄μΈ μ§λ₯ν μ°¨λμ μ±κ³΅μ μΌλ‘ ν΅ν©νμλ€. μΌλ³Έμμλ 2014λ
5μμ μμλ Automated Driving System Research Projectλ μμ¨μ£Όν μμ€ν
κ³Ό μ°¨μΈλ λμ¬ κ΅ν΅ μλ¨μ κ°λ° λ° κ²μ¦μ μ΄μ μ λ§μΆμλ€.
κΈ°μ‘΄ μ°κ΅¬λ€μ λν μ‘°μ¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μμ¨μ£Όν μμ€ν
μ κ΅ν΅ μ°Έμ¬μλ€μ μμ λλ₯Ό ν₯μμν€κ³ , κ΅ν΅ νΌμ‘μ κ°μμν€λ©°, μ΄μ μ νΈμμ±μ μ¦μ§μν€λ κ²μ΄ μ¦λͺ
λμλ€. λ€μν λ°©λ²λ‘ λ€μ΄ μΈμ§, κ±°λ κ³ν, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ μ΄μ κ°μ λμ¬ λλ‘ μμ¨μ£Όνμ°¨μ ν΅μ¬ κΈ°μ λ€μ κ°λ°νκΈ° μνμ¬ μ¬μ©λμλ€. νμ§λ§ λ§μ μ΅μ μ μμ¨μ£Όν μ°κ΅¬λ€μ κ° κΈ°μ μ κ°λ°μ λ³κ°λ‘ κ³ λ €νμ¬ μ§νν΄μλ€. κ²°κ³Όμ μΌλ‘ ν΅ν©μ μΈ κ΄μ μμμ μμ¨μ£Όν κΈ°μ μ€κ³λ μμ§ μΆ©λΆν κ³ λ €λμ΄ μμλ€.
λ°λΌμ, λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ 볡μ‘ν λμ¬ λλ‘ νκ²½μμ λΌμ΄λ€, μΉ΄λ©λΌ, GPS, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κ°λ¨ν κ²½λ‘ λ§΅μ κΈ°λ°ν μμ μμ¨μ£Όν μκ³ λ¦¬μ¦μ κ°λ°νλ κ²μ λͺ©νλ‘ νμλ€. μ μλ μμ¨μ£Όν μκ³ λ¦¬μ¦μ λΉν΅μ κ΅μ°¨λ‘λ₯Ό ν¬ν¨ν λμ¬ λλ‘ μν©μ μ°¨λ κ±°λ μμΈ‘κΈ°μ λͺ¨λΈ μμΈ‘ μ μ΄ κΈ°λ²μ κΈ°λ°νμ¬ μ€κ³λμλ€. λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ λμ , μ μ νκ²½ νν λ° μ’
ν‘λ°©ν₯ κ±°λ κ³νμ μ€μ μ μΌλ‘ λ€λ£¨μλ€.
λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ λμ¬ λλ‘ μμ¨μ£Όνμ μν κ±°λ κ³ν μκ³ λ¦¬μ¦μ κ°μλ₯Ό μ μνμμΌλ©°, μ€μ κ΅ν΅ μν©μμμ μ€ν κ²°κ³Όλ μ μλ μκ³ λ¦¬μ¦μ ν¨κ³Όμ±κ³Ό μ΄μ μ κ±°λκ³Όμ μ μ¬μ±μ 보μ¬μ£Όμλ€. μ€μ°¨ μ€ν κ²°κ³Όλ λΉν΅μ κ΅μ°¨λ‘λ₯Ό ν¬ν¨ν λμ¬ μλ리μ€μμμ κ°κ±΄ν μ±λ₯μ 보μ¬μ£Όμλ€.The foci of automotive researches have been expanding from passive safety systems to active safety systems with advances in sensing and processing technologies. Recently, the majority of automotive makers have already commercialized active safety systems, such as adaptive cruise control (ACC), lane keeping assistance (LKA), and autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Such advances have extended the research field beyond active safety systems to automated driving systems to achieve zero fatalities. Especially, automated driving on urban roads has become a key issue because urban roads possess numerous risk factors for traffic accidents, such as sidewalks, blind spots, on-street parking, motorcycles, and pedestrians, which cause higher accident rates and fatalities than motorways. Several projects have been conducted, and many others are still underway to evaluate the effects of automated driving in environmental, demographic, social, and economic aspects. For example, the European project AdaptIVe, develops various automated driving functions and defines specific evaluation methodologies. In addition, CityMobil2 successfully integrates driverless intelligent vehicles in nine other environments throughout Europe. In Japan, the Automated Driving System Research Project began on May 2014, which focuses on the development and verification of automated driving systems and next-generation urban transportation.
From a careful review of a considerable amount of literature, automated driving systems have been proven to increase the safety of traffic users, reduce traffic congestion, and improve driver convenience. Various methodologies have been employed to develop the core technology of automated vehicles on urban roads, such as perception, motion planning, and control. However, the current state-of-the-art automated driving algorithms focus on the development of each technology separately. Consequently, designing automated driving systems from an integrated perspective is not yet sufficiently considered.
Therefore, this dissertation focused on developing a fully autonomous driving algorithm in urban complex scenarios using LiDAR, vision, GPS, and a simple path map. The proposed autonomous driving algorithm covered the urban road scenarios with uncontrolled intersections based on vehicle motion prediction and model predictive control approach. Mainly, four research issues are considered: dynamic/static environment representation, and longitudinal/lateral motion planning.
In the remainder of this thesis, we will provide an overview of the proposed motion planning algorithm for urban autonomous driving and the experimental results in real traffic, which showed the effectiveness and human-like behaviors of the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm has been tested and evaluated using both simulation and vehicle tests. The test results show the robust performance of urban scenarios, including uncontrolled intersections.Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1. Background and Motivation 1
1.2. Previous Researches 4
1.3. Thesis Objectives 9
1.4. Thesis Outline 10
Chapter 2 Overview of Motion Planning for Automated Driving System 11
Chapter 3 Dynamic Environment Representation with Motion Prediction 15
3.1. Moving Object Classification 17
3.2. Vehicle State based Direct Motion Prediction 20
3.2.1. Data Collection Vehicle 22
3.2.2. Target Roads 23
3.2.3. Dataset Selection 24
3.2.4. Network Architecture 25
3.2.5. Input and Output Features 33
3.2.6. Encoder and Decoder 33
3.2.7. Sequence Length 34
3.3. Road Structure based Interactive Motion Prediction 36
3.3.1. Maneuver Definition 38
3.3.2. Network Architecture 39
3.3.3. Path Following Model based State Predictor 47
3.3.4. Estimation of predictor uncertainty 50
3.3.5. Motion Parameter Estimation 53
3.3.6. Interactive Maneuver Prediction 56
3.4. Intersection Approaching Vehicle Motion Prediction 59
3.4.1. Driver Behavior Model at Intersections 59
3.4.2. Intention Inference based State Prediction 63
Chapter 4 Static Environment Representation 67
4.1. Static Obstacle Map Construction 69
4.2. Free Space Boundary Decision 74
4.3. Drivable Corridor Decision 76
Chapter 5 Longitudinal Motion Planning 81
5.1. In-Lane Target Following 82
5.2. Proactive Motion Planning for Narrow Road Driving 85
5.2.1. Motivation for Collision Preventive Velocity Planning 85
5.2.2. Desired Acceleration Decision 86
5.3. Uncontrolled Intersection 90
5.3.1. Driving Phase and Mode Definition 91
5.3.2. State Machine for Driving Mode Decision 92
5.3.3. Motion Planner for Approach Mode 95
5.3.4. Motion Planner for Risk Management Phase 98
Chapter 6 Lateral Motion Planning 105
6.1. Vehicle Model 107
6.2. Cost Function and Constraints 109
Chapter 7 Performance Evaluation 115
7.1. Motion Prediction 115
7.1.1. Prediction Accuracy Analysis of Vehicle State based Direct Motion Predictor 115
7.1.2. Prediction Accuracy and Effect Analysis of Road Structure based Interactive Motion Predictor 122
7.2. Prediction based Distance Control at Urban Roads 132
7.2.1. Driving Data Analysis of Direct Motion Predictor Application at Urban Roads 133
7.2.2. Case Study of Vehicle Test at Urban Roads 138
7.2.3. Analysis of Vehicle Test Results on Urban Roads 147
7.3. Complex Urban Roads 153
7.3.1. Case Study of Vehicle Test at Complex Urban Roads 154
7.3.2. Closed-loop Simulation based Safety Analysis 162
7.4. Uncontrolled Intersections 164
7.4.1. Simulation based Algorithm Comparison of Motion Planner 164
7.4.2. Monte-Carlo Simulation based Safety Analysis 166
7.4.3. Vehicle Tests Results in Real Traffic Conditions 172
7.4.4. Similarity Analysis between Human and Automated Vehicle 194
7.5. Multi-Lane Turn Intersections 197
7.5.1. Case Study of a Multi-Lane Left Turn Scenario 197
7.5.2. Analysis of Motion Planning Application Results 203
Chapter 8 Conclusion & Future Works 207
8.1. Conclusion 207
8.2. Future Works 209
Bibliography 210
Abstract in Korean 219Docto
- β¦