An efficient deterministic parallel algorithm for two processors precedence constraint scheduling

AbstractWe present here a new deterministic parallel algorithm for the two-processor scheduling problem. The algorithm uses only O(n3) processors and takes O(log2n) time on a CREW PRAM. In order to prove the above bounds we show how to compute in NC the lexicographically first matching for a special kind of convex bipartite graphs

Parallel algorithms for two processors precedence constraint scheduling

The final publication is available at link.springer.comPeer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

The Matching Problem in General Graphs is in Quasi-NC

We show that the perfect matching problem in general graphs is in Quasi-NC. That is, we give a deterministic parallel algorithm which runs in $O(\log^3 n)$ time on $n^{O(\log^2 n)}$ processors. The result is obtained by a derandomization of the Isolation Lemma for perfect matchings, which was introduced in the classic paper by Mulmuley, Vazirani and Vazirani [1987] to obtain a Randomized NC algorithm. Our proof extends the framework of Fenner, Gurjar and Thierauf [2016], who proved the analogous result in the special case of bipartite graphs. Compared to that setting, several new ingredients are needed due to the significantly more complex structure of perfect matchings in general graphs. In particular, our proof heavily relies on the laminar structure of the faces of the perfect matching polytope.Comment: Accepted to FOCS 2017 (58th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

Faster Algorithms for Semi-Matching Problems

We consider the problem of finding \textit{semi-matching} in bipartite graphs which is also extensively studied under various names in the scheduling literature. We give faster algorithms for both weighted and unweighted case. For the weighted case, we give an $O(nm\log n)$-time algorithm, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $m$ is the number of edges, by exploiting the geometric structure of the problem. This improves the classical $O(n^3)$ algorithms by Horn [Operations Research 1973] and Bruno, Coffman and Sethi [Communications of the ACM 1974]. For the unweighted case, the bound could be improved even further. We give a simple divide-and-conquer algorithm which runs in $O(\sqrt{n}m\log n)$ time, improving two previous $O(nm)$-time algorithms by Abraham [MSc thesis, University of Glasgow 2003] and Harvey, Ladner, Lov\'asz and Tamir [WADS 2003 and Journal of Algorithms 2006]. We also extend this algorithm to solve the \textit{Balance Edge Cover} problem in $O(\sqrt{n}m\log n)$ time, improving the previous $O(nm)$-time algorithm by Harada, Ono, Sadakane and Yamashita [ISAAC 2008].Comment: ICALP 201