46,439 research outputs found
A Bayesian approach to constrained single- and multi-objective optimization
This article addresses the problem of derivative-free (single- or
multi-objective) optimization subject to multiple inequality constraints. Both
the objective and constraint functions are assumed to be smooth, non-linear and
expensive to evaluate. As a consequence, the number of evaluations that can be
used to carry out the optimization is very limited, as in complex industrial
design optimization problems. The method we propose to overcome this difficulty
has its roots in both the Bayesian and the multi-objective optimization
literatures. More specifically, an extended domination rule is used to handle
objectives and constraints in a unified way, and a corresponding expected
hyper-volume improvement sampling criterion is proposed. This new criterion is
naturally adapted to the search of a feasible point when none is available, and
reduces to existing Bayesian sampling criteria---the classical Expected
Improvement (EI) criterion and some of its constrained/multi-objective
extensions---as soon as at least one feasible point is available. The
calculation and optimization of the criterion are performed using Sequential
Monte Carlo techniques. In particular, an algorithm similar to the subset
simulation method, which is well known in the field of structural reliability,
is used to estimate the criterion. The method, which we call BMOO (for Bayesian
Multi-Objective Optimization), is compared to state-of-the-art algorithms for
single- and multi-objective constrained optimization
Solving the G-problems in less than 500 iterations: Improved efficient constrained optimization by surrogate modeling and adaptive parameter control
Constrained optimization of high-dimensional numerical problems plays an
important role in many scientific and industrial applications. Function
evaluations in many industrial applications are severely limited and no
analytical information about objective function and constraint functions is
available. For such expensive black-box optimization tasks, the constraint
optimization algorithm COBRA was proposed, making use of RBF surrogate modeling
for both the objective and the constraint functions. COBRA has shown remarkable
success in solving reliably complex benchmark problems in less than 500
function evaluations. Unfortunately, COBRA requires careful adjustment of
parameters in order to do so.
In this work we present a new self-adjusting algorithm SACOBRA, which is
based on COBRA and capable to achieve high-quality results with very few
function evaluations and no parameter tuning. It is shown with the help of
performance profiles on a set of benchmark problems (G-problems, MOPTA08) that
SACOBRA consistently outperforms any COBRA algorithm with fixed parameter
setting. We analyze the importance of the several new elements in SACOBRA and
find that each element of SACOBRA plays a role to boost up the overall
optimization performance. We discuss the reasons behind and get in this way a
better understanding of high-quality RBF surrogate modeling
- …