4 research outputs found

    Multi-agent model predictive control for transport phenomena processes

    Get PDF
    Throughout the last decades, control systems theory has thrived, promoting new areas of development, especially for chemical and biological process engineering. Production processes are becoming more and more complex and researchers, academics and industry professionals dedicate more time in order to keep up-to-date with the increasing complexity and nonlinearity. Developing control architectures and incorporating novel control techniques as a way to overcome optimization problems is the main focus for all people involved. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) has been one of the main responses from academia for the exponential growth of process complexity and fast growing scale. Prediction algorithms are the response to manage closed-loop stability and optimize results. Adaptation mechanisms are nowadays seen as a natural extension of prediction methodologies in order to tackle uncertainty in distributed parameter systems (DPS), governed by partial differential equations (PDE). Parameters observers and Lyapunov adaptation laws are also tools for the systems in study. Stability and stabilization conditions, being implicitly or explicitly incorporated in the NMPC formulation, by means of pointwise min-norm techniques, are also being used and combined as a way to improve control performance, robustness and reduce computational effort or maintain it low, without degrading control action. With the above assumptions, centralized (or single agent) or decentralized and distributed Model Predictive Control (MPC) architectures (also called multi-agent) have been applied to a series of nonlinear distributed parameters systems with transport phenomena, such as bioreactors, water delivery canals and heat exchangers to show the importance and success of these control techniques

    ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ частичной устойчивости ΠΈ управлСния : [ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠ΅ пособиС]

    Full text link
    Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ частичной устойчивости (стабилизации), Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ устойчивости (стабилизации) ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΊ части ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, βˆ’ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ, возникшиС Π² Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ устойчивости, восходящСй ΠΊ классичСским Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π°ΠΌ А. М. Ляпунова ΠΈ А. ΠŸΡƒΠ°Π½ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΅. Благодаря большой матСматичСской общности, эти Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ мСТдисциплинарными ΠΈ СстСствСнным ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ… явлСний ΠΈ управляСмых процСссов Π² самых Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ… Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ

    A generalization of input-to-state stability

    No full text
    Input-to-State Stability (ISS) and its many derivatives have proved to be extremely useful in the analysis and design of robustly stable nonlinear systems. In this paper, we present a generalization of ISS that subsumes several ISS-type properties and discuss cases where this generalization may fail
    corecore