Personas versus clones for player decision modelling

The current paper investigates how to model human play styles. Building on decision and persona theory we evolve game playing agents representing human decision making styles. Two methods are developed, applied, and compared: procedural personas, based on utilities designed with expert knowledge, and clones, trained to reproduce play traces. Additionally, two metrics for comparing agent and human decision making styles are proposed and compared. Results indicate that personas evolved from designer intuitions can capture human decision making styles equally well as clones evolved from human play traces.peer-reviewe

StABLE: Making Player Modeling Possible for Sandbox Games

Digital games are increasingly delivered as services. Understanding how players interact with games on an ongoing basis is important for maintenance. Logs of player activity offer a potentially rich window into how and why players interact with games, but can be difficult to render into actionable insights because of their size and complexity. In particular, understanding the sequential behavior in-game logs can be difficult. In this thesis, we present the String Analysis of Behavior Log Elements (StABLE) method, which renders location and activity data from a game log file into a sequence of symbols which can be analyzed using techniques from text mining. We show that by intelligently designing sequences of features, it is possible to cluster players into groups corresponding to experience or motivation by analyzing a dataset containing Minecraft game logs. The findings demonstrate the validity of the proposed method, and illustrate its potential utility in mining readily available data to better understand player behavior

Automated iterative game design

Computational systems to model aspects of iterative game design were proposed, encompassing: game generation, sampling behaviors in a game, analyzing game behaviors for patterns, and iteratively altering a game design. Explicit models of the actions in games as planning operators allowed an intelligent system to reason about how actions and action sequences affect gameplay and to create new mechanics. Metrics to analyze differences in player strategies were presented and were able to identify flaws in game designs. An intelligent system learned design knowledge about gameplay and was able to reduce the number of design iterations needed during playtesting a game to achieve a design goal. Implications for how intelligent systems augment and automate human game design practices are discussed.Ph.D