A Temporal Logic for Hyperproperties

Hyperproperties, as introduced by Clarkson and Schneider, characterize the correctness of a computer program as a condition on its set of computation paths. Standard temporal logics can only refer to a single path at a time, and therefore cannot express many hyperproperties of interest, including noninterference and other important properties in security and coding theory. In this paper, we investigate an extension of temporal logic with explicit path variables. We show that the quantification over paths naturally subsumes other extensions of temporal logic with operators for information flow and knowledge. The model checking problem for temporal logic with path quantification is decidable. For alternation depth 1, the complexity is PSPACE in the length of the formula and NLOGSPACE in the size of the system, as for linear-time temporal logic

On verifying timed hyperproperties

We study the satisfiability and model-checking problems for timed hyperproperties specified with HyperMTL, a timed extension of HyperLTL. Depending on whether interleaving of events in different traces is allowed, two possible semantics can be defined for timed hyperproperties: asynchronous and synchronous. While the satisfiability problem can be decided similarly to HyperLTL regardless of the choice of semantics, we show that the model-checking problem, unless the specification is alternation-free, is undecidable even when very restricted timing constraints are allowed. On the positive side, we show that model checking HyperMTL with quantifier alternations is possible under certain conditions in the synchronous semantics, or when there is a fixed bound on the length of the time domain.EP/K026399/1 and EP/P020011/

Complexity and Unwinding for Intransitive Noninterference

The paper considers several definitions of information flow security for intransitive policies from the point of view of the complexity of verifying whether a finite-state system is secure. The results are as follows. Checking (i) P-security (Goguen and Meseguer), (ii) IP-security (Haigh and Young), and (iii) TA-security (van der Meyden) are all in PTIME, while checking TO-security (van der Meyden) is undecidable, as is checking ITO-security (van der Meyden). The most important ingredients in the proofs of the PTIME upper bounds are new characterizations of the respective security notions, which also lead to new unwinding proof techniques that are shown to be sound and complete for these notions of security, and enable the algorithms to return simple counter-examples demonstrating insecurity. Our results for IP-security improve a previous doubly exponential bound of Hadj-Alouane et al

Model counting for reactive systems

Model counting is the problem of computing the number of solutions for a logical formula. In the last few years, it has been primarily studied for propositional logic, and has been shown to be useful in many applications. In planning, for example, propositional model counting has been used to compute the robustness of a plan in an incomplete domain. In information-flow control, model counting has been applied to measure the amount of information leaked by a security-critical system. In this thesis, we introduce the model counting problem for linear-time properties, and show its applications in formal verification. In the same way propositional model counting generalizes the satisfiability problem for propositional logic, counting models for linear-time properties generalizes the emptiness problem for languages over infinite words to one that asks for the number of words in a language. The model counting problem, thus, provides a foundation for quantitative extensions of model checking, where not only the existence of computations that violate the specification is determined, but also the number of such violations. We solve the model counting problem for the prominent class of omega-regular properties. We present algorithms for solving the problem for different classes of properties, and show the advantages of our algorithms in comparison to indirect approaches based on encodings into propositional logic. We further show how model counting can be used for solving a variety of quantitative problems in formal verification, including probabilistic model checking, quantitative information-flow in security-critical systems, and the synthesis of approximate implementations for reactive systems.Das Modellzählproblem fragt nach der Anzahl der Lösungen einer logischen Formel, und wurde in den letzten Jahren hauptsächlich für Aussagenlogik untersucht. Das Zählen von Modellen aussagenlogischer Formeln hat sich in vielen Anwendungen als nützlich erwiesen. Im Bereich der künstlichen Intelligenz wurde das Zählen von Modellen beispielsweise verwendet, um die Robustheit eines Plans in einem unvollständigen Weltmodell zu bewerten. Das Zählen von Modellen kann auch verwendet werden, um in sicherheitskritischen Systemen die Menge an enthüllten vertraulichen Daten zu messen. Diese Dissertation stellt das Modellzählproblem für Linearzeiteigenschaften vor, und untersucht dessen Rolle in der Welt der formalen Verifikation. Das Zählen von Modellen für Linearzeiteigenschaften führt zu neuen quantitativen Erweiterungen klassischer Verifikationsprobleme, bei denen nicht nur die Existenz eines Fehlers in einem System zu überprüfen ist, sondern auch die Anzahl solcher Fehler. Wir präsentieren Algorithmen zur Lösung des Modellzählproblems für verschiedene Klassen von Linearzeiteigenschaften und zeigen die Vorteile unserer Algorithmen im Vergleich zu indirekten Ansätzen, die auf Kodierungen der untersuchten Probleme in Aussagenlogik basieren. Darüberhinaus zeigen wir wie das Zählen von Modellen zur Lösung einer Vielzahl quantitativer Probleme in der formalen Verifikation verwendet werden kann. Dies beinhaltet unter anderem die Analyse probabilistischer Modelle, die Kontrolle quantitativen Informationsflusses in sicherheitskritischen Systemen, und die Synthese von approximativen Implementierungen für reaktive Systeme