89 research outputs found

    VERIFICATION OF CALCULATION METHOD FOR DRONE MICRO-DOPPLER SIGNATURE ESTIMATION

    Get PDF
    Drones micro-Doppler signatures obtained by FMCW radars are an excellent procedure for malicious drone detection, identification and classification. There are a number of contributions dealing with recorded spectrograms with these micro-Doppler signatures, but very low number of them has analyzed possibility to calculate echo caused by drone moving parts. In this paper, starting from already existing mathematical apparatus, we presented such spectrograms as a function of changing drone moving parts characteristics: rotor number, blades number, blade length and rotor moving speed. This development is the part of a wider project intended to prevent malicious drone usage

    Radar UAV and Bird Signature comparisons with Micro-Doppler

    Get PDF
    This chapter reviews the similarities and differences between micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also referred to as drones, and bird targets from the signals they present to radar sensors. With the increasing usage of UAV platforms in both military and civilian applications, the demand for the ability to sense drone locations and discriminate them from background clutter and non-drone targets is becoming a vital requirement. A comparable target in size, speed and Radar Cross Section (RCS) is a bird. These are present almost everywhere that radar systems have to operate and have been detected by radar since the early origin of radar engineering. Due to the similarity in radar signature birds can cause common misclassification between them and the priority drone targets which has been identified as a current key challenge in radar sensing. In this chapter radar bird and drone signature research is initially summarised, then a fundamental model that represents the key contributions from drone rotor blades is introduced and compared to real measurements. Laboratory measurements of quadcopter rotor blade signatures with across 4 linear polarisations are then investigated in order to evaluate the trend of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) vs. aspect angle. Next bird signatures from two separate radar systems are shown and compared to drone targets also present in the captures which are of comparable size and RCS. The outputs of all research presented are then summarised in the concluding remarks

    ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ปจ๋ณผ๋ฃจ์…˜ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฌด์ธํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(์ง€๋Šฅํ˜•์œตํ•ฉ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ „๊ณต), 2021. 2. ๊ณฝ๋…ธ์ค€.With the upsurge in using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in various fields, identifying them in real-time is becoming an important issue. However, the identification of UAVs is difficult due to their characteristics such as Low altitude, Slow speed and Small radar cross-section (LSS). To identify UAVs with existing deterministic systems, the algorithm becomes more complex and requires large computations, making it unsuitable for real-time systems. Hence, we need a new approach to these threats. Deep learning models extract features from a large amount of data by themselves and have shown outstanding performance in various tasks. Using these advantages, deep learning-based UAV classification models using various sensors are being studied recently. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based classification model that learns the micro-Doppler signatures (MDS) of targets represented on radar spectrogram images. To enable this, first, we recorded five LSS targets (three types of UAVs and two different types of human activities) with a frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar in various scenarios. Then, we converted signals into spectrograms in the form of images by Short-time Fourier transform (STFT). After the data refinement and augmentation, we made our own radar spectrogram dataset. Secondly, we analyzed characteristics of the radar spectrogram dataset using the ResNet-18 model and designed the lightweight ResNet-SP model for the real-time system. The results show that the proposed ResNet-SP has a training time of 242 seconds and an accuracy of 83.39%, which is superior to the ResNet-18 that takes 640 seconds for training with an accuracy of 79.88%.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š”, ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ์ƒ์— ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ด๋™ํ‘œ์ ์˜ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ ๋„ํ”Œ๋Ÿฌ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๋Š” ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ์œ„ํ•ด ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์„ฏ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์†Œํ˜• ์ด๋™ํ‘œ์ (๋ฌด์ธํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ 3์ข…๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋žŒํ–‰๋™ 2์ข…)์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜๋ณ€์กฐ ์—ฐ์†ํŒŒ๋ ˆ์ด๋”๋กœ ํ‘œ์ ๋“ค์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์— ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ‘ธ๋ฆฌ์— ๋ณ€ํ™˜์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณผ์ •๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ •์ œ ๋ฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ•์˜ ์ „์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์ฒด ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ดํ›„ ๊ด‘ํ•™์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ ResNet-18์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ด๋”์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๊ด‘ํ•™์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ์ •๋ณด์™œ๊ณก ๋ฐ ์†์‹ค์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์‹ ํ˜ธํ˜•ํƒœ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋…ธ์ด์ฆˆ ์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํŠน์ง•๊ณผ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ ˆ์ด๋” ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹ ํŠน์„ฑ๋ถ„์„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ๋Ÿ‰ํ™” ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ •ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ResNet-SP ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ResNet-18๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์†๋„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . iv List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Related Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1 Micro Doppler Signature (MDS) . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Classification of UAVs using MDS . . . . . . . 6 3 Dataset Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.1 Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2 Pre-processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4 Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1 ResNet-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.2 ResNet-SP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 5.1 Experiment Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 5.2 Training Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Abstract (In Korean) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38Maste

    Review of radar classification and RCS characterisation techniques for small UAVs or drones

    Get PDF
    This review explores radar-based techniques currently utilised in the literature to monitor small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) or drones; several challenges have arisen due to their rapid emergence and commercialisation within the mass market. The potential security threats posed by these systems are collectively presented and the legal issues surrounding their successful integration are briefly outlined. Key difficulties involved in the identification and hence tracking of these `radar elusive' systems are discussed, along with how research efforts relating to drone detection, classification and radar cross section (RCS) characterisation are being directed in order to address this emerging challenge. Such methods are thoroughly analysed and critiqued; finally, an overall picture of the field in its current state is painted, alongside scope for future work over a broad spectrum

    Development of a K-band FMCW flexible radar prototype for detection and classification of nano-drones

    Get PDF
    ยฉ Cranfield University 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright ownerNano-drones of the size of an insect can be used to perform stealthy surveillance or to gather intelligence crucial to attack roles at a relatively short range and within enclosed spaces and buildings. Conventional radar systems have been optimised to detect and classify bigger targets and are not specifically designed to detect nano-targets of less than 5 cm in size. Hence, this project aims to develop a radar system to detect and classify an insect-like size drone that corresponds to a low RCS. This will exhibit challenges due to the nature of the weak echoed signal that will be masked by an uninterested target with a stronger echoed signal. To tackle this sort of problem, micro Doppler extraction is applied for better target detection. This type of target that consists of a bladed propeller will give rise to a significant micro-Doppler signature that will contribute to the discernment of the interested target. An ad-hoc S-band FMCW radar prototype using off-the-shelf components An ad-hoc S-band FMCW radar prototype using off-the-shelf components has been successfully delivered. This prototype act as a groundwork for the next research phase of design and development for a higher frequency. Then, with the strong foundation of the S-band demonstrator, a flexible K-band FMCW radar prototype has successfully delivered aiming to meet the research purpose. The radar prototype offers a wide range of flexibility for the user to select the radar parameters (like operating frequency, ramp duration, bandwidth and integration time) and configure its performance. It will collect the signatures of real targets (nano-drone model) so that their performance can be assessed on experimental data. The results demonstrated that a nano-drone, a small size of less than 5 cm can be detected with the radar prototype developed.Ph
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore