15,013 research outputs found
Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 228:A soft edge target zone model: theory and application to Hong Kong
Hong Kongâs currency is pegged to the US dollar in a currency board arrangement. In autumn 2003,the Hong Kong dollar appreciated from close to 7.80 per US dollar to 7.70, as investors feared that the currency board would be abandoned. In the wake of this appreciation, the monetary authorities revamped the one-sided currency board mechanism into a symmetric two-sided system with a narrow exchange rate band. This paper reviews the characteristics of the new currency board arrangement and embeds a theoretical soft edge target zone model typifying many intermediate regimes, to explain the notable achievement of speculative peace and credibility since May 2005
Exact and asymptotic solutions of the call auction problem
The call auction is a widely used trading mechanism, especially during the
opening and closing periods of financial markets. In this paper, we study a
standard call auction problem where orders are submitted according to Poisson
processes, with random prices distributed according to a general distribution,
and may be cancelled at any time. We compute the analytical expressions of the
distributions of the traded volume, of the lower and upper bounds of the
clearing prices, and of the price range of these possible clearing prices of
the call auction. Using results from the theory of order statistics and a
theorem on the limit of sequences of random variables with independent random
indices, we derive the weak limits of all these distributions. In this setting,
traded volume and bounds of the clearing prices are found to be asymptotically
normal, while the clearing price range is asymptotically exponential. All the
parameters of these distributions are explicitly derived as functions of the
parameters of the incoming orders' flows.Comment: 24 pages, 7 figure
Modeling Electricity Markets as Two-Stage Capacity Constrained Price Competition Games under Uncertainty
The last decade has seen an increasing application of game theoretic tools in the analysis of electricity markets and the strategic behavior of market players. This paper focuses on the model examined by Fabra et al. (2008), where the market is described by a two-stage game with the firms choosing their capacity in the first stage and then competing in prices in the second stage. By allowing the firms to endogenously determine their capacity, through the capacity investment stage of the game, they can greatly affect competition in the subsequent pricing stage. Extending this model to the demand uncertainty case gives a very good candidate for modeling the strategic aspect of the investment decisions in an electricity market. After investigating the required assumptions for applying the model in electricity markets, we present some numerical examples of the model on the resulting equilibrium capacities, prices and profits of the firms. We then proceed with two results on the minimum value of price caps and the minimum required revenue from capacity mechanisms in order to induce adequate investments
Regime switching volatility calibration by the Baum-Welch method
Regime switching volatility models provide a tractable method of modelling stochastic
volatility. Currently the most popular method of regime switching calibration is the
Hamilton filter. We propose using the Baum-Welch algorithm, an established technique
from Engineering, to calibrate regime switching models instead. We demonstrate the
Baum-Welch algorithm and discuss the significant advantages that it provides compared to the Hamilton filter. We provide computational results of calibrating and comparing the performance of the Baum-Welch and the Hamilton filter to S&P 500 and Nikkei 225 data, examining their performance in and out of sample
Additive energy forward curves in a Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework
One of the peculiarities of power and gas markets is the delivery mechanism
of forward contracts. The seller of a futures contract commits to deliver, say,
power, over a certain period, while the classical forward is a financial
agreement settled on a maturity date. Our purpose is to design a
Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework for an additive, mean-reverting, multicommodity
market consisting of forward contracts of any delivery period. The main
assumption is that forward prices can be represented as affine functions of a
universal source of randomness. This allows us to completely characterize the
models which prevent arbitrage opportunities: this boils down to finding a
density between a risk-neutral measure , such that the prices of
traded assets like forward contracts are true -martingales, and the
real world probability measure , under which forward prices are
mean-reverting. The Girsanov kernel for such a transformation turns out to be
stochastic and unbounded in the diffusion part, while in the jump part the
Girsanov kernel must be deterministic and bounded: thus, in this respect, we
prove two results on the martingale property of stochastic exponentials. The
first allows to validate measure changes made of two components: an
Esscher-type density and a Girsanov transform with stochastic and unbounded
kernel. The second uses a different approach and works for the case of
continuous density. We apply this framework to two models: a generalized
Lucia-Schwartz model and a cross-commodity cointegrated market.Comment: 28 page
Institutional Weakness and Stock Price Volatility
We find an empirical regularity that stronger creditor protection reduces the volatility of stock market prices. We analyze two distinct mechanisms that characterize equity price volatility: government guarantees and creditor protection. Using a Tobin q model, we demonstrate that weak creditor protection that gives rise to government guarantees and tightens credit constraints, increases stock price volatility. Empirically, accounting for the probability of financial crises, we find that government guarantees and weak institutions that tighten credit constraints increase aggregated stock price volatility.
Modeling Electricity Markets as Two-Stage Capacity Constrained Price Competition Games under Uncertainty
The last decade has seen an increasing application of game theoretic tools in the analysis of electricity markets and the strategic behavior of market players. This paper focuses on the model examined by Fabra et al. (2008), where the market is described by a two-stage game with the firms choosing their capacity in the first stage and then competing in prices in the second stage. By allowing the firms to endogenously determine their capacity, through the capacity investment stage of the game, they can greatly affect competition in the subsequent pricing stage. Extending this model to the demand uncertainty case gives a very good candidate for modeling the strategic aspect of the investment decisions in an electricity market. After investigating the required assumptions for applying the model in electricity markets, we present some numerical examples of the model on the resulting equilibrium capacities, prices and profits of the firms. We then proceed with two results on the minimum value of price caps and the minimum required revenue from capacity mechanisms in order to induce adequate investments.Capacity Constraints; Electricity Markets; Regulatory Policy; Strategic Behaviour;
- âŠ