16 research outputs found

    Iterated uniform finite-state transducers

    Get PDF
    A deterministic iterated uniform finite-state transducer (for short, iufst) operates the same length-preserving transduction on several left-to-right sweeps. The first sweep occurs on the input string, while any other sweep processes the output of the previous one. We focus on constant sweep bounded iufsts. We study their descriptional power vs. deterministic finite automata, and the state cost of implementing language operations. Then, we focus on non-constant sweep bounded iufsts, showing a nonregular language hierarchy depending on sweep complexity

    Descriptional Complexity of Finite Automata -- Selected Highlights

    Full text link
    The state complexity, respectively, nondeterministic state complexity of a regular language LL is the number of states of the minimal deterministic, respectively, of a minimal nondeterministic finite automaton for LL. Some of the most studied state complexity questions deal with size comparisons of nondeterministic finite automata of differing degree of ambiguity. More generally, if for a regular language we compare the size of description by a finite automaton and by a more powerful language definition mechanism, such as a context-free grammar, we encounter non-recursive trade-offs. Operational state complexity studies the state complexity of the language resulting from a regularity preserving operation as a function of the complexity of the argument languages. Determining the state complexity of combined operations is generally challenging and for general combinations of operations that include intersection and marked concatenation it is uncomputable

    Optimal Regular Expressions for Palindromes of Given Length

    Get PDF
    The language P_n (P?_n, respectively) consists of all words that are palindromes of length 2n (2n-1, respectively) over a fixed binary alphabet. We construct a regular expression that specifies P_n (P?_n, respectively) of alphabetic width 4? 2?-4 (3? 2?-4, respectively) and show that this is optimal, that is, the expression has minimum alphabetic width among all expressions that describe P_n (P?_n, respectively). To this end we give optimal expressions for the first k palindromes in lexicographic order of odd and even length, proving that the optimal bound is 2n+4(k-1)-2 S?(k-1) in case of odd length and 2n+3(k-1)-2 S?(k-1)-1 for even length, respectively. Here S?(n) refers to the Hamming weight function, which denotes the number of ones in the binary expansion of the number n

    Lower bounds for the state complexity of probabilistic languages and the language of prime numbers

    Full text link
    This paper studies the complexity of languages of finite words using automata theory. To go beyond the class of regular languages, we consider infinite automata and the notion of state complexity defined by Karp. Motivated by the seminal paper of Rabin from 1963 introducing probabilistic automata, we study the (deterministic) state complexity of probabilistic languages and prove that probabilistic languages can have arbitrarily high deterministic state complexity. We then look at alternating automata as introduced by Chandra, Kozen and Stockmeyer: such machines run independent computations on the word and gather their answers through boolean combinations. We devise a lower bound technique relying on boundedly generated lattices of languages, and give two applications of this technique. The first is a hierarchy theorem, stating that there are languages of arbitrarily high polynomial alternating state complexity, and the second is a linear lower bound on the alternating state complexity of the prime numbers written in binary. This second result strengthens a result of Hartmanis and Shank from 1968, which implies an exponentially worse lower bound for the same model.Comment: Submitted to the Journal of Logic and Computation, Special Issue on LFCS'2016) (Logical Foundations of Computer Science). Guest Editors: S. Artemov and A. Nerode. This journal version extends two conference papers: the first published in the proceedings of LFCS'2016 and the second in the proceedings of LICS'2018. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1607.0025
    corecore