375 research outputs found

    A Spectral Bound on Hypergraph Discrepancy

    Get PDF
    Let H\mathcal{H} be a tt-regular hypergraph on nn vertices and mm edges. Let MM be the m×nm \times n incidence matrix of H\mathcal{H} and let us denote λ=maxv1,v=1Mv\lambda =\max_{v \perp \overline{1},\|v\| = 1}\|Mv\|. We show that the discrepancy of H\mathcal{H} is O(t+λ)O(\sqrt{t} + \lambda). As a corollary, this gives us that for every tt, the discrepancy of a random tt-regular hypergraph with nn vertices and mnm \geq n edges is almost surely O(t)O(\sqrt{t}) as nn grows. The proof also gives a polynomial time algorithm that takes a hypergraph as input and outputs a coloring with the above guarantee.Comment: 18 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1811.01491, several changes to the presentatio

    Approximate Hypergraph Coloring under Low-discrepancy and Related Promises

    Get PDF
    A hypergraph is said to be χ\chi-colorable if its vertices can be colored with χ\chi colors so that no hyperedge is monochromatic. 22-colorability is a fundamental property (called Property B) of hypergraphs and is extensively studied in combinatorics. Algorithmically, however, given a 22-colorable kk-uniform hypergraph, it is NP-hard to find a 22-coloring miscoloring fewer than a fraction 2k+12^{-k+1} of hyperedges (which is achieved by a random 22-coloring), and the best algorithms to color the hypergraph properly require n11/k\approx n^{1-1/k} colors, approaching the trivial bound of nn as kk increases. In this work, we study the complexity of approximate hypergraph coloring, for both the maximization (finding a 22-coloring with fewest miscolored edges) and minimization (finding a proper coloring using fewest number of colors) versions, when the input hypergraph is promised to have the following stronger properties than 22-colorability: (A) Low-discrepancy: If the hypergraph has discrepancy k\ell \ll \sqrt{k}, we give an algorithm to color the it with nO(2/k)\approx n^{O(\ell^2/k)} colors. However, for the maximization version, we prove NP-hardness of finding a 22-coloring miscoloring a smaller than 2O(k)2^{-O(k)} (resp. kO(k)k^{-O(k)}) fraction of the hyperedges when =O(logk)\ell = O(\log k) (resp. =2\ell=2). Assuming the UGC, we improve the latter hardness factor to 2O(k)2^{-O(k)} for almost discrepancy-11 hypergraphs. (B) Rainbow colorability: If the hypergraph has a (k)(k-\ell)-coloring such that each hyperedge is polychromatic with all these colors, we give a 22-coloring algorithm that miscolors at most kΩ(k)k^{-\Omega(k)} of the hyperedges when k\ell \ll \sqrt{k}, and complement this with a matching UG hardness result showing that when =k\ell =\sqrt{k}, it is hard to even beat the 2k+12^{-k+1} bound achieved by a random coloring.Comment: Approx 201

    Approximating Hereditary Discrepancy via Small Width Ellipsoids

    Full text link
    The Discrepancy of a hypergraph is the minimum attainable value, over two-colorings of its vertices, of the maximum absolute imbalance of any hyperedge. The Hereditary Discrepancy of a hypergraph, defined as the maximum discrepancy of a restriction of the hypergraph to a subset of its vertices, is a measure of its complexity. Lovasz, Spencer and Vesztergombi (1986) related the natural extension of this quantity to matrices to rounding algorithms for linear programs, and gave a determinant based lower bound on the hereditary discrepancy. Matousek (2011) showed that this bound is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor, leaving open the question of actually computing this bound. Recent work by Nikolov, Talwar and Zhang (2013) showed a polynomial time O~(log3n)\tilde{O}(\log^3 n)-approximation to hereditary discrepancy, as a by-product of their work in differential privacy. In this paper, we give a direct simple O(log3/2n)O(\log^{3/2} n)-approximation algorithm for this problem. We show that up to this approximation factor, the hereditary discrepancy of a matrix AA is characterized by the optimal value of simple geometric convex program that seeks to minimize the largest \ell_{\infty} norm of any point in a ellipsoid containing the columns of AA. This characterization promises to be a useful tool in discrepancy theory

    Hypergraph expanders of all uniformities from Cayley graphs

    Get PDF
    Hypergraph expanders are hypergraphs with surprising, non-intuitive expansion properties. In a recent paper, the first author gave a simple construction, which can be randomized, of 33-uniform hypergraph expanders with polylogarithmic degree. We generalize this construction, giving a simple construction of rr-uniform hypergraph expanders for all r3r \geq 3.Comment: 32 page

    New Notions and Constructions of Sparsification for Graphs and Hypergraphs

    Get PDF
    A sparsifier of a graph GG (Bencz\'ur and Karger; Spielman and Teng) is a sparse weighted subgraph G~\tilde G that approximately retains the cut structure of GG. For general graphs, non-trivial sparsification is possible only by using weighted graphs in which different edges have different weights. Even for graphs that admit unweighted sparsifiers, there are no known polynomial time algorithms that find such unweighted sparsifiers. We study a weaker notion of sparsification suggested by Oveis Gharan, in which the number of edges in each cut (S,Sˉ)(S,\bar S) is not approximated within a multiplicative factor (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon), but is, instead, approximated up to an additive term bounded by ϵ\epsilon times dS+vol(S)d\cdot |S| + \text{vol}(S), where dd is the average degree, and vol(S)\text{vol}(S) is the sum of the degrees of the vertices in SS. We provide a probabilistic polynomial time construction of such sparsifiers for every graph, and our sparsifiers have a near-optimal number of edges O(ϵ2npolylog(1/ϵ))O(\epsilon^{-2} n {\rm polylog}(1/\epsilon)). We also provide a deterministic polynomial time construction that constructs sparsifiers with a weaker property having the optimal number of edges O(ϵ2n)O(\epsilon^{-2} n). Our constructions also satisfy a spectral version of the ``additive sparsification'' property. Our construction of ``additive sparsifiers'' with Oϵ(n)O_\epsilon (n) edges also works for hypergraphs, and provides the first non-trivial notion of sparsification for hypergraphs achievable with O(n)O(n) hyperedges when ϵ\epsilon and the rank rr of the hyperedges are constant. Finally, we provide a new construction of spectral hypergraph sparsifiers, according to the standard definition, with poly(ϵ1,r)nlogn{\rm poly}(\epsilon^{-1},r)\cdot n\log n hyperedges, improving over the previous spectral construction (Soma and Yoshida) that used O~(n3)\tilde O(n^3) hyperedges even for constant rr and ϵ\epsilon.Comment: 31 page
    corecore