3,736 research outputs found
(Leftmost-Outermost) Beta Reduction is Invariant, Indeed
Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable
machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is
lambda-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the
computational complexity of a lambda-term? This paper presents the first
complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is
completely machine-independent and based over a standard notion in the theory
of lambda-calculus: the length of a leftmost-outermost derivation to normal
form is an invariant cost model. Such a theorem cannot be proved by directly
relating lambda-calculus with Turing machines or random access machines,
because of the size explosion problem: there are terms that in a linear number
of steps produce an exponentially long output. The first step towards the
solution is to shift to a notion of evaluation for which the length and the
size of the output are linearly related. This is done by adopting the linear
substitution calculus (LSC), a calculus of explicit substitutions modeled after
linear logic proof nets and admitting a decomposition of leftmost-outermost
derivations with the desired property. Thus, the LSC is invariant with respect
to, say, random access machines. The second step is to show that LSC is
invariant with respect to the lambda-calculus. The size explosion problem seems
to imply that this is not possible: having the same notions of normal form,
evaluation in the LSC is exponentially longer than in the lambda-calculus. We
solve such an impasse by introducing a new form of shared normal form and
shared reduction, deemed useful. Useful evaluation avoids those steps that only
unshare the output without contributing to beta-redexes, i.e. the steps that
cause the blow-up in size. The main technical contribution of the paper is
indeed the definition of useful reductions and the thorough analysis of their
properties.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1405.331
Constructing applicative functors
Applicative functors define an interface to computation that is more general, and correspondingly weaker, than that of monads. First used in parser libraries, they are now seeing a wide range of applications. This paper sets out to explore the space of non-monadic applicative functors useful in programming. We work with a generalization, lax monoidal functors, and consider several methods of constructing useful functors of this type, just as transformers are used to construct computational monads. For example, coends, familiar to functional programmers as existential types, yield a range of useful applicative functors, including left Kan extensions. Other constructions are final fixed points, a limited sum construction, and a generalization of the semi-direct product of monoids. Implementations in Haskell are included where possible
Beta Reduction is Invariant, Indeed (Long Version)
Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable
machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is
-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the
computational complexity of a -term? This paper presents the first
complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is
completely machine-independent and based over a standard notion in the theory
of -calculus: the length of a leftmost-outermost derivation to normal
form is an invariant cost model. Such a theorem cannot be proved by directly
relating -calculus with Turing machines or random access machines,
because of the size explosion problem: there are terms that in a linear number
of steps produce an exponentially long output. The first step towards the
solution is to shift to a notion of evaluation for which the length and the
size of the output are linearly related. This is done by adopting the linear
substitution calculus (LSC), a calculus of explicit substitutions modelled
after linear logic and proof-nets and admitting a decomposition of
leftmost-outermost derivations with the desired property. Thus, the LSC is
invariant with respect to, say, random access machines. The second step is to
show that LSC is invariant with respect to the -calculus. The size
explosion problem seems to imply that this is not possible: having the same
notions of normal form, evaluation in the LSC is exponentially longer than in
the -calculus. We solve such an impasse by introducing a new form of
shared normal form and shared reduction, deemed useful. Useful evaluation
avoids those steps that only unshare the output without contributing to
-redexes, i.e., the steps that cause the blow-up in size.Comment: 29 page
A Rational Deconstruction of Landin's SECD Machine with the J Operator
Landin's SECD machine was the first abstract machine for applicative
expressions, i.e., functional programs. Landin's J operator was the first
control operator for functional languages, and was specified by an extension of
the SECD machine. We present a family of evaluation functions corresponding to
this extension of the SECD machine, using a series of elementary
transformations (transformation into continu-ation-passing style (CPS) and
defunctionalization, chiefly) and their left inverses (transformation into
direct style and refunctionalization). To this end, we modernize the SECD
machine into a bisimilar one that operates in lockstep with the original one
but that (1) does not use a data stack and (2) uses the caller-save rather than
the callee-save convention for environments. We also identify that the dump
component of the SECD machine is managed in a callee-save way. The caller-save
counterpart of the modernized SECD machine precisely corresponds to Thielecke's
double-barrelled continuations and to Felleisen's encoding of J in terms of
call/cc. We then variously characterize the J operator in terms of CPS and in
terms of delimited-control operators in the CPS hierarchy. As a byproduct, we
also present several reduction semantics for applicative expressions with the J
operator, based on Curien's original calculus of explicit substitutions. These
reduction semantics mechanically correspond to the modernized versions of the
SECD machine and to the best of our knowledge, they provide the first syntactic
theories of applicative expressions with the J operator
- …