9,909 research outputs found
A Proof Theoretic Approach to Operational Semantics
AbstractProof theory can be applied to the problem of specifying and reasoning about the operational semantics of process calculi. We overview some recent research in which λ-tree syntax is used to encode expressions containing bindings and sequent calculus is used to reason about operational semantics. There are various benefits of this proof theoretic approach for the π-calculus: the treatment of bindings can be captured with no side conditions; bisimulation has a simple and natural specification in which the difference between bound input and bound output is characterized using difference quantifiers; various modal logics for mobility can be specified declaratively; and simple logic programming-like deduction involving subsets of second-order unification provides immediate implementations of symbolic bisimulation. These benefits should extend to other process calculi as well. As partial evidence of this, a simple λ-tree syntax extension to the tyft/tyxt rule format for name-binding and name-passing is possible that allows one to conclude that (open) bisimilarity is a congruence
Global semantic typing for inductive and coinductive computing
Inductive and coinductive types are commonly construed as ontological
(Church-style) types, denoting canonical data-sets such as natural numbers,
lists, and streams. For various purposes, notably the study of programs in the
context of global semantics, it is preferable to think of types as semantical
properties (Curry-style). Intrinsic theories were introduced in the late 1990s
to provide a purely logical framework for reasoning about programs and their
semantic types. We extend them here to data given by any combination of
inductive and coinductive definitions. This approach is of interest because it
fits tightly with syntactic, semantic, and proof theoretic fundamentals of
formal logic, with potential applications in implicit computational complexity
as well as extraction of programs from proofs. We prove a Canonicity Theorem,
showing that the global definition of program typing, via the usual (Tarskian)
semantics of first-order logic, agrees with their operational semantics in the
intended model. Finally, we show that every intrinsic theory is interpretable
in a conservative extension of first-order arithmetic. This means that
quantification over infinite data objects does not lead, on its own, to
proof-theoretic strength beyond that of Peano Arithmetic. Intrinsic theories
are perfectly amenable to formulas-as-types Curry-Howard morphisms, and were
used to characterize major computational complexity classes Their extensions
described here have similar potential which has already been applied
Nominal Logic Programming
Nominal logic is an extension of first-order logic which provides a simple
foundation for formalizing and reasoning about abstract syntax modulo
consistent renaming of bound names (that is, alpha-equivalence). This article
investigates logic programming based on nominal logic. We describe some typical
nominal logic programs, and develop the model-theoretic, proof-theoretic, and
operational semantics of such programs. Besides being of interest for ensuring
the correct behavior of implementations, these results provide a rigorous
foundation for techniques for analysis and reasoning about nominal logic
programs, as we illustrate via examples.Comment: 46 pages; 19 page appendix; 13 figures. Revised journal submission as
of July 23, 200
Programming in logic without logic programming
In previous work, we proposed a logic-based framework in which computation is
the execution of actions in an attempt to make reactive rules of the form if
antecedent then consequent true in a canonical model of a logic program
determined by an initial state, sequence of events, and the resulting sequence
of subsequent states. In this model-theoretic semantics, reactive rules are the
driving force, and logic programs play only a supporting role.
In the canonical model, states, actions and other events are represented with
timestamps. But in the operational semantics, for the sake of efficiency,
timestamps are omitted and only the current state is maintained. State
transitions are performed reactively by executing actions to make the
consequents of rules true whenever the antecedents become true. This
operational semantics is sound, but incomplete. It cannot make reactive rules
true by preventing their antecedents from becoming true, or by proactively
making their consequents true before their antecedents become true.
In this paper, we characterize the notion of reactive model, and prove that
the operational semantics can generate all and only such models. In order to
focus on the main issues, we omit the logic programming component of the
framework.Comment: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
(TPLP
Operational Semantics of Resolution and Productivity in Horn Clause Logic
This paper presents a study of operational and type-theoretic properties of
different resolution strategies in Horn clause logic. We distinguish four
different kinds of resolution: resolution by unification (SLD-resolution),
resolution by term-matching, the recently introduced structural resolution, and
partial (or lazy) resolution. We express them all uniformly as abstract
reduction systems, which allows us to undertake a thorough comparative analysis
of their properties. To match this small-step semantics, we propose to take
Howard's System H as a type-theoretic semantic counterpart. Using System H, we
interpret Horn formulas as types, and a derivation for a given formula as the
proof term inhabiting the type given by the formula. We prove soundness of
these abstract reduction systems relative to System H, and we show completeness
of SLD-resolution and structural resolution relative to System H. We identify
conditions under which structural resolution is operationally equivalent to
SLD-resolution. We show correspondence between term-matching resolution for
Horn clause programs without existential variables and term rewriting.Comment: Journal Formal Aspect of Computing, 201
Inductive Definition and Domain Theoretic Properties of Fully Abstract
A construction of fully abstract typed models for PCF and PCF^+ (i.e., PCF +
"parallel conditional function"), respectively, is presented. It is based on
general notions of sequential computational strategies and wittingly consistent
non-deterministic strategies introduced by the author in the seventies.
Although these notions of strategies are old, the definition of the fully
abstract models is new, in that it is given level-by-level in the finite type
hierarchy. To prove full abstraction and non-dcpo domain theoretic properties
of these models, a theory of computational strategies is developed. This is
also an alternative and, in a sense, an analogue to the later game strategy
semantics approaches of Abramsky, Jagadeesan, and Malacaria; Hyland and Ong;
and Nickau. In both cases of PCF and PCF^+ there are definable universal
(surjective) functionals from numerical functions to any given type,
respectively, which also makes each of these models unique up to isomorphism.
Although such models are non-omega-complete and therefore not continuous in the
traditional terminology, they are also proved to be sequentially complete (a
weakened form of omega-completeness), "naturally" continuous (with respect to
existing directed "pointwise", or "natural" lubs) and also "naturally"
omega-algebraic and "naturally" bounded complete -- appropriate generalisation
of the ordinary notions of domain theory to the case of non-dcpos.Comment: 50 page
- …