69 research outputs found

    BDDC and FETI-DP under Minimalist Assumptions

    Full text link
    The FETI-DP, BDDC and P-FETI-DP preconditioners are derived in a particulary simple abstract form. It is shown that their properties can be obtained from only on a very small set of algebraic assumptions. The presentation is purely algebraic and it does not use any particular definition of method components, such as substructures and coarse degrees of freedom. It is then shown that P-FETI-DP and BDDC are in fact the same. The FETI-DP and the BDDC preconditioned operators are of the same algebraic form, and the standard condition number bound carries over to arbitrary abstract operators of this form. The equality of eigenvalues of BDDC and FETI-DP also holds in the minimalist abstract setting. The abstract framework is explained on a standard substructuring example.Comment: 11 pages, 1 figure, also available at http://www-math.cudenver.edu/ccm/reports

    An application of the BDDC method to the Navier-Stokes equations in 3-D cavity

    Get PDF
    summary:We deal with numerical simulation of incompressible flow governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. The problem is discretised using the finite element method, and the arising system of nonlinear equations is solved by Picard iteration. We explore the applicability of the Balancing Domain Decomposition by Constraints (BDDC) method to nonsymmetric problems arising from such linearisation. One step of BDDC is applied as the preconditioner for the stabilized variant of the biconjugate gradient (BiCGstab) method. We present results for a 3-D cavity problem computed on 32 cores of a parallel supercomputer

    Balancing domain decomposition by constraints associated with subobjects

    Get PDF
    A simple variant of the BDDC preconditioner in which constraints are imposed on a selected set of subobjects (subdomain subedges, subfaces and vertices between pairs of subedges) is presented. We are able to show that the condition number of the preconditioner is bounded by C(1+log(L/h))2, where C is a constant, and h and L are the characteristic sizes of the mesh and the subobjects, respectively. As L can be chosen almost freely, the condition number can theoretically be as small as O(1). We will discuss the pros and cons of the preconditioner and its application to heterogeneous problems. Numerical results on supercomputers are provided.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Balancing domain decomposition by constraints associated with subobjects

    Get PDF
    A simple variant of the BDDC preconditioner in which constraints are imposed on a selected set of subobjects (subdomain subedges, subfaces and vertices between pairs of subedges) is presented. We are able to show that the condition number of the preconditioner is bounded by C 1 + log(L/h)2, where C is a constant, and h and L are the characteristic sizes of the mesh and the subobjects, respectively. As L can be chosen almost freely, the condition number can theoretically be as small as O(1). We will discuss the pros and cons of the preconditioner and its application to heterogeneous problems. Numerical results on supercomputers are provided
    corecore