306 research outputs found

    An adaptive finite element method for laser surface hardening of steel problem

    Get PDF
    ACMAC’s PrePrint Repository aim is to enable open access to the scholarly output of ACMAC

    Dual weighted residual method for laser surface hardening of steel problem

    Get PDF
    Abstract. The main focus of this article is on the development of Adaptive Finite Element Method (AFEM) for the optimal control problem of laser surface hardening of steel governed by a dynamical system consisting of a semi-linear parabolic equation and an ordinary differential equation using Dual Weighted Residual Method (DWR). A posteriori error estimators using DWR method have been developed when a continuous piecewise linear discretization has been used for the finite element approximation of space variables and a discontinuous Galerkin method has been used for time and control discretizations. Further numerical results obtained are presented are compared with residual method numerical results. Key Words. Laser surface of steel problem, Adaptive finite element methods, Dual weighted residual methods, a posteriori error estimates. 1

    Pointwise best approximation results for Galerkin finite element solutions of parabolic problems

    Full text link
    In this paper we establish a best approximation property of fully discrete Galerkin finite element solutions of second order parabolic problems on convex polygonal and polyhedral domains in the LL^\infty norm. The discretization method uses of continuous Lagrange finite elements in space and discontinuous Galerkin methods in time of an arbitrary order. The method of proof differs from the established fully discrete error estimate techniques and for the first time allows to obtain such results in three space dimensions. It uses elliptic results, discrete resolvent estimates in weighted norms, and the discrete maximal parabolic regularity for discontinuous Galerkin methods established by the authors in [16]. In addition, the proof does not require any relationship between spatial mesh sizes and time steps. We also establish a local best approximation property that shows a more local behavior of the error at a given point

    Error Analysis of an HDG Method for a Distributed Optimal

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we present a priori error analysis of a hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method for a distributed optimal control problem governed by diffusion equations. The error estimates are established based on the projection-based approach recently used to analyze these methods for the diffusion equation. We proved that for approximations of degree k on conforming meshes, the orders of convergence of the approximation to fluxes and scalar variables are k+1 when the local stabilization parameter is suitably chosen

    Output error estimation strategies for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of unsteady convection‐dominated flows

    Full text link
    We study practical strategies for estimating numerical errors in scalar outputs calculated from unsteady simulations of convection‐dominated flows, including those governed by the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. The discretization is a discontinuous Galerkin finite element method in space and time on static spatial meshes. Time‐integral quantities are considered for scalar outputs and these are shown to superconverge with temporal refinement. Output error estimates are calculated using the adjoint‐weighted residual method, where the unsteady adjoint solution is obtained using a discrete approach with an iterative solver. We investigate the accuracy versus computational cost trade‐off for various approximations of the fine‐space adjoint and find that exact adjoint solutions are accurate but expensive. To reduce the cost, we propose a local temporal reconstruction that takes advantage of superconvergence properties at Radau points, and a spatial reconstruction based on nearest‐neighbor elements. This inexact adjoint yields output error estimates at a computational cost of less than 2.5 times that of the forward problem for the cases tested. The calculated error estimates account for numerical error arising from both the spatial and temporal discretizations, and we present a method for identifying the percentage contributions of each discretization to the output error. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/88080/1/3224_ftp.pd
    corecore