1,531 research outputs found
A parallel repetition theorem for all entangled games
The behavior of games repeated in parallel, when played with quantumly
entangled players, has received much attention in recent years. Quantum
analogues of Raz's classical parallel repetition theorem have been proved for
many special classes of games. However, for general entangled games no parallel
repetition theorem was known. We prove that the entangled value of a two-player
game repeated times in parallel is at most for a
constant depending on , provided that the entangled value of is
less than 1. In particular, this gives the first proof that the entangled value
of a parallel repeated game must converge to 0 for all games whose entangled
value is less than 1. Central to our proof is a combination of both classical
and quantum correlated sampling.Comment: To appear in the 43rd International Colloquium on Automata,
Languages, and Programming (ICALP
Parallel repetition for entangled k-player games via fast quantum search
We present two parallel repetition theorems for the entangled value of
multi-player, one-round free games (games where the inputs come from a product
distribution). Our first theorem shows that for a -player free game with
entangled value , the -fold repetition of
has entangled value at most , where is the answer length of any
player. In contrast, the best known parallel repetition theorem for the
classical value of two-player free games is , due to Barak, et al. (RANDOM 2009). This
suggests the possibility of a separation between the behavior of entangled and
classical free games under parallel repetition.
Our second theorem handles the broader class of free games where the
players can output (possibly entangled) quantum states. For such games, the
repeated entangled value is upper bounded by . We also show that the dependence of the exponent
on is necessary: we exhibit a -player free game and such
that .
Our analysis exploits the novel connection between communication protocols
and quantum parallel repetition, first explored by Chailloux and Scarpa (ICALP
2014). We demonstrate that better communication protocols yield better parallel
repetition theorems: our first theorem crucially uses a quantum search protocol
by Aaronson and Ambainis, which gives a quadratic speed-up for distributed
search problems. Finally, our results apply to a broader class of games than
were previously considered before; in particular, we obtain the first parallel
repetition theorem for entangled games involving more than two players, and for
games involving quantum outputs.Comment: This paper is a significantly revised version of arXiv:1411.1397,
which erroneously claimed strong parallel repetition for free entangled
games. Fixed author order to alphabetica
Parallel Repetition of Entangled Games with Exponential Decay via the Superposed Information Cost
In a two-player game, two cooperating but non communicating players, Alice
and Bob, receive inputs taken from a probability distribution. Each of them
produces an output and they win the game if they satisfy some predicate on
their inputs/outputs. The entangled value of a game is the
maximum probability that Alice and Bob can win the game if they are allowed to
share an entangled state prior to receiving their inputs.
The -fold parallel repetition of consists of instances of
where the players receive all the inputs at the same time and produce all
the outputs at the same time. They win if they win each instance of .
In this paper we show that for any game such that , decreases exponentially in . First, for
any game on the uniform distribution, we show that , where and are the sizes of the input
and output sets. From this result, we show that for any entangled game ,
where is the input distribution of and
. This implies parallel
repetition with exponential decay as long as for
general games. To prove this parallel repetition, we introduce the concept of
\emph{Superposed Information Cost} for entangled games which is inspired from
the information cost used in communication complexity.Comment: In the first version of this paper we presented a different, stronger
Corollary 1 but due to an error in the proof we had to modify it in the
second version. This third version is a minor update. We correct some typos
and re-introduce a proof accidentally commented out in the second versio
The Hilbertian Tensor Norm and Entangled Two-Prover Games
We study tensor norms over Banach spaces and their relations to quantum
information theory, in particular their connection with two-prover games. We
consider a version of the Hilbertian tensor norm and its dual
that allow us to consider games with arbitrary output alphabet
sizes. We establish direct-product theorems and prove a generalized
Grothendieck inequality for these tensor norms. Furthermore, we investigate the
connection between the Hilbertian tensor norm and the set of quantum
probability distributions, and show two applications to quantum information
theory: firstly, we give an alternative proof of the perfect parallel
repetition theorem for entangled XOR games; and secondly, we prove a new upper
bound on the ratio between the entangled and the classical value of two-prover
games.Comment: 33 pages, some of the results have been obtained independently in
arXiv:1007.3043v2, v2: an error in Theorem 4 has been corrected; Section 6
rewritten, v3: completely rewritten in order to improve readability; title
changed; references added; published versio
Entangled Games Are Hard to Approximate
We establish the first hardness results for the problem of computing the value of one-round games played by a verifier and a team of provers who can share quantum entanglement. In particular, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate within an inverse polynomial the value of a one-round game with (i) a quantum verifier and two entangled provers or (ii) a classical verifier and three entangled provers. Previously it was not even known if computing the value exactly is NP-hard. We also describe a mathematical conjecture, which, if true, would imply hardness of approximation of entangled-prover games to within a constant. Using our techniques we also show that every language in PSPACE has a two-prover one-round interactive proof system with perfect completeness and soundness 1-1/poly even against entangled provers. We start our proof by describing two ways to modify classical multiprover games to make them resistant to entangled provers. We then show that a strategy for the modified game that uses entanglement can be âroundedâ to one that does not. The results then follow from classical inapproximability bounds. Our work implies that, unless P=NP, the values of entangled-prover games cannot be computed by semidefinite programs that are polynomial in the size of the verifier's system, a method that has been successful for more restricted quantum games
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
- âŠ