research

Parallel Repetition of Entangled Games with Exponential Decay via the Superposed Information Cost

Abstract

In a two-player game, two cooperating but non communicating players, Alice and Bob, receive inputs taken from a probability distribution. Each of them produces an output and they win the game if they satisfy some predicate on their inputs/outputs. The entangled value ω(G)\omega^*(G) of a game GG is the maximum probability that Alice and Bob can win the game if they are allowed to share an entangled state prior to receiving their inputs. The nn-fold parallel repetition GnG^n of GG consists of nn instances of GG where the players receive all the inputs at the same time and produce all the outputs at the same time. They win GnG^n if they win each instance of GG. In this paper we show that for any game GG such that ω(G)=1ε<1\omega^*(G) = 1 - \varepsilon < 1, ω(Gn)\omega^*(G^n) decreases exponentially in nn. First, for any game GG on the uniform distribution, we show that ω(Gn)=(1ε2)Ω(nlog(IO)log(ε))\omega^*(G^n) = (1 - \varepsilon^2)^{\Omega\left(\frac{n}{\log(|I||O|)} - |\log(\varepsilon)|\right)}, where I|I| and O|O| are the sizes of the input and output sets. From this result, we show that for any entangled game GG, ω(Gn)(1ε2)Ω(nQlog(IO)log(ε)Q)\omega^*(G^n) \le (1 - \varepsilon^2)^{\Omega(\frac{n}{Q\log(|I||O|)} - \frac{|\log(\varepsilon)|}{Q})} where pp is the input distribution of GG and Q=I2maxxypxy2minxypxyQ= \frac{|I|^2 \max_{xy} p_{xy}^2 }{\min_{xy} p_{xy} }. This implies parallel repetition with exponential decay as long as minxy{pxy}0\min_{xy} \{p_{xy}\} \neq 0 for general games. To prove this parallel repetition, we introduce the concept of \emph{Superposed Information Cost} for entangled games which is inspired from the information cost used in communication complexity.Comment: In the first version of this paper we presented a different, stronger Corollary 1 but due to an error in the proof we had to modify it in the second version. This third version is a minor update. We correct some typos and re-introduce a proof accidentally commented out in the second versio

    Similar works