17,199 research outputs found

    Stratification and domination in graphs.

    Get PDF
    Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2006.In a recent manuscript (Stratification and domination in graphs. Discrete Math. 272 (2003), 171-185) a new mathematical framework for studying domination is presented. It is shown that the domination number and many domination related parameters can be interpreted as restricted 2-stratifications or 2-colorings. This framework places the domination number in a new perspective and suggests many other parameters of a graph which are related in some way to the domination number. In this thesis, we continue this study of domination and stratification in graphs. Let F be a 2-stratified graph with one fixed blue vertex v specified. We say that F is rooted at the blue vertex v. An F-coloring of a graph G is a red-blue coloring of the vertices of G such that every blue vertex v of G belongs to a copy of F (not necessarily induced in G) rooted at v. The F-domination number yF(GQ of G is the minimum number of red vertices of G in an F-coloring of G. Chapter 1 is an introduction to the chapters that follow. In Chapter 2, we investigate the X-domination number of prisms when X is a 2-stratified 4-cycle rooted at a blue vertex where a prism is the cartesian product Cn x K2, n > 3, of a cycle Cn and a K2. In Chapter 3 we investigate the F-domination number when (i) F is a 2-stratified path P3 on three vertices rooted at a blue vertex which is an end-vertex of the F3 and is adjacent to a blue vertex and with the remaining vertex colored red. In particular, we show that for a tree of diameter at least three this parameter is at most two-thirds its order and we characterize the trees attaining this bound. (ii) We also investigate the F-domination number when F is a 2-stratified K3 rooted at a blue vertex and with exactly one red vertex. We show that if G is a connected graph of order n in which every edge is in a triangle, then for n sufficiently large this parameter is at most (n — /n)/2 and this bound is sharp. In Chapter 4, we further investigate the F-domination number when F is a 2- stratified path P3 on three vertices rooted at a blue vertex which is an end-vertex of the P3 and is adjacent to a blue vertex with the remaining vertex colored red. We show that for a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least two this parameter is bounded above by (n —1)/2 with the exception of five graphs (one each of orders four, five and six and two of order eight). For n > 9, we characterize those graphs that achieve the upper bound of (n — l)/2. In Chapter 5, we define an f-coloring of a graph to be a red-blue coloring of the vertices such that every blue vertex is adjacent to a blue vertex and to a red vertex, with the red vertex itself adjacent to some other red vertex. The f-domination number yz{G) of a graph G is the minimum number of red vertices of G in an f-coloring of G. Let G be a connected graph of order n > 4 with minimum degree at least 2. We prove that (i) if G has maximum degree A where A 4 with maximum degree A where A 5 with maximum degree A where

    A note on the double Roman domination number of graphs

    Get PDF
    summary:For a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a double Roman dominating function is a function f ⁣:V{0,1,2,3}f\colon V\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\} having the property that if f(v)=0f(v)=0, then the vertex vv must have at least two neighbors assigned 22 under ff or one neighbor with f(w)=3f(w)=3, and if f(v)=1f(v)=1, then the vertex vv must have at least one neighbor with f(w)2f(w)\geq 2. The weight of a double Roman dominating function ff is the sum f(V)=vVf(v)f(V)=\sum \nolimits _{v\in V}f(v). The minimum weight of a double Roman dominating function on GG is called the double Roman domination number of GG and is denoted by γdR(G)\gamma _{\rm dR}(G). In this paper, we establish a new upper bound on the double Roman domination number of graphs. We prove that every connected graph GG with minimum degree at least two and GC5G\neq C_{5} satisfies the inequality γdR(G)1311n\gamma _{\rm dR}(G)\leq \lfloor \frac {13}{11}n\rfloor . One open question posed by R. A. Beeler et al. has been settled

    Domination parameters with number 2: Interrelations and algorithmic consequences

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we study the most basic domination invariants in graphs, in which number 2 is intrinsic part of their definitions. We classify them upon three criteria, two of which give the following previously studied invariants: the weak 2-domination number, γw2(G), the 2-domination number, γ2(G), the {2}-domination number, γ{2}(G), the double domination number, γ×2(G), the total {2}-domination number, γt{2}(G), and the total double domination number, γt×2(G), where G is a graph in which the corresponding invariant is well defined. The third criterion yields rainbow versions of the mentioned six parameters, one of which has already been well studied, and three other give new interesting parameters. Together with a special, extensively studied Roman domination, γR(G), and two classical parameters, the domination number, γ(G), and the total domination number, γt(G), we consider 13 domination invariants in graphs. In the main result of the paper we present sharp upper and lower bounds of each of the invariants in terms of every other invariant, a large majority of which are new results proven in this paper. As a consequence of the main theorem we obtain new complexity results regarding the existence of approximation algorithms for the studied invariants, matched with tight or almost tight inapproximability bounds, which hold even in the class of split graphs.Fil: Bonomo, Flavia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Brešar, Boštjan. Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics; Eslovenia. University of Maribor; EsloveniaFil: Grippo, Luciano Norberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; ArgentinaFil: Milanič, Martin. University of Primorska; EsloveniaFil: Safe, Martin Dario. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación; Argentin

    Domination parameters with number 2: interrelations and algorithmic consequences

    Full text link
    In this paper, we study the most basic domination invariants in graphs, in which number 2 is intrinsic part of their definitions. We classify them upon three criteria, two of which give the following previously studied invariants: the weak 22-domination number, γw2(G)\gamma_{w2}(G), the 22-domination number, γ2(G)\gamma_2(G), the {2}\{2\}-domination number, γ{2}(G)\gamma_{\{2\}}(G), the double domination number, γ×2(G)\gamma_{\times 2}(G), the total {2}\{2\}-domination number, γt{2}(G)\gamma_{t\{2\}}(G), and the total double domination number, γt×2(G)\gamma_{t\times 2}(G), where GG is a graph in which a corresponding invariant is well defined. The third criterion yields rainbow versions of the mentioned six parameters, one of which has already been well studied, and three other give new interesting parameters. Together with a special, extensively studied Roman domination, γR(G)\gamma_R(G), and two classical parameters, the domination number, γ(G)\gamma(G), and the total domination number, γt(G)\gamma_t(G), we consider 13 domination invariants in graphs GG. In the main result of the paper we present sharp upper and lower bounds of each of the invariants in terms of every other invariant, large majority of which are new results proven in this paper. As a consequence of the main theorem we obtain some complexity results for the studied invariants, in particular regarding the existence of approximation algorithms and inapproximability bounds.Comment: 45 pages, 4 tables, 7 figure

    Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture

    Full text link
    A total dominating set of a graph GG is a set DD of vertices of GG such that every vertex of GG has a neighbor in DD. A locating-total dominating set of GG is a total dominating set DD of GG with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside DD have distinct neighbors in DD; that is, for distinct vertices uu and vv outside DD, N(u)DN(v)DN(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D where N(u)N(u) denotes the open neighborhood of uu. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-total domination number of GG, denoted LT(G)LT(G), is the minimum cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in GG. It is well-known that every connected graph of order n3n \geq 3 has a total dominating set of size at most 23n\frac{2}{3}n. We conjecture that if GG is a twin-free graph of order nn with no isolated vertex, then LT(G)23nLT(G) \leq \frac{2}{3}n. We prove the conjecture for graphs without 44-cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if GG is a twin-free graph of order nn, then LT(G)34nLT(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur

    Domination number of graphs with minimum degree five

    Full text link
    We prove that for every graph GG on nn vertices and with minimum degree five, the domination number γ(G)\gamma(G) cannot exceed n/3n/3. The proof combines an algorithmic approach and the discharging method. Using the same technique, we provide a shorter proof for the known upper bound 4n/114n/11 on the domination number of graphs of minimum degree four.Comment: 17 page
    corecore