135,274 research outputs found
A note on p-values interpreted as plausibilities
P-values are a mainstay in statistics but are often misinterpreted. We
propose a new interpretation of p-value as a meaningful plausibility, where
this is to be interpreted formally within the inferential model framework. We
show that, for most practical hypothesis testing problems, there exists an
inferential model such that the corresponding plausibility function, evaluated
at the null hypothesis, is exactly the p-value. The advantages of this
representation are that the notion of plausibility is consistent with the way
practitioners use and interpret p-values, and the plausibility calculation
avoids the troublesome conditioning on the truthfulness of the null. This
connection with plausibilities also reveals a shortcoming of standard p-values
in problems with non-trivial parameter constraints.Comment: 13 pages, 1 figur
Some Remarks on the Model Theory of Epistemic Plausibility Models
Classical logics of knowledge and belief are usually interpreted on Kripke
models, for which a mathematically well-developed model theory is available.
However, such models are inadequate to capture dynamic phenomena. Therefore,
epistemic plausibility models have been introduced. Because these are much
richer structures than Kripke models, they do not straightforwardly inherit the
model-theoretical results of modal logic. Therefore, while epistemic
plausibility structures are well-suited for modeling purposes, an extensive
investigation of their model theory has been lacking so far. The aim of the
present paper is to fill exactly this gap, by initiating a systematic
exploration of the model theory of epistemic plausibility models. Like in
'ordinary' modal logic, the focus will be on the notion of bisimulation. We
define various notions of bisimulations (parametrized by a language L) and show
that L-bisimilarity implies L-equivalence. We prove a Hennesy-Milner type
result, and also two undefinability results. However, our main point is a
negative one, viz. that bisimulations cannot straightforwardly be generalized
to epistemic plausibility models if conditional belief is taken into account.
We present two ways of coping with this issue: (i) adding a modality to the
language, and (ii) putting extra constraints on the models. Finally, we make
some remarks about the interaction between bisimulation and dynamic model
changes.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure
Naturalness of the relaxion mechanism
The relaxion mechanism is a novel solution to the hierarchy problem. In this
first statistical analysis of the relaxion mechanism, we quantify the relative
plausibility of a QCD and a non-QCD relaxion model versus the Standard Model
with Bayesian statistics, which includes an automatic penalty for fine-tuning.
We find that in light of the hierarchy between the weak and Planck scales,
relaxion models are favoured by colossal Bayes-factors. Constraints upon \eg
the vacuum energy during relaxation, however, shrink the Bayes-factors such
that relaxion models are only slightly favoured. Including the bounds on
shatters the plausibility of the QCD relaxion
model as it typically yields . Finally,
we augment our models with scalar-field inflation and consider measurements of
inflationary observables from BICEP/Planck. We find that, all told, the
Standard Model is favoured by huge Bayes-factors as the relaxion models require
fine-tuning such that the Hubble parameter is less than the height of the
periodic barriers. Thus, whilst we confirm that relaxion models could solve the
hierarchy problem, we find that their unconventional cosmology demolishes their
plausibility
Evidence and plausibility in neighborhood structures
The intuitive notion of evidence has both semantic and syntactic features. In
this paper, we develop an {\em evidence logic} for epistemic agents faced with
possibly contradictory evidence from different sources. The logic is based on a
neighborhood semantics, where a neighborhood indicates that the agent has
reason to believe that the true state of the world lies in . Further notions
of relative plausibility between worlds and beliefs based on the latter
ordering are then defined in terms of this evidence structure, yielding our
intended models for evidence-based beliefs. In addition, we also consider a
second more general flavor, where belief and plausibility are modeled using
additional primitive relations, and we prove a representation theorem showing
that each such general model is a -morphic image of an intended one. This
semantics invites a number of natural special cases, depending on how uniform
we make the evidence sets, and how coherent their total structure. We give a
structural study of the resulting `uniform' and `flat' models. Our main result
are sound and complete axiomatizations for the logics of all four major model
classes with respect to the modal language of evidence, belief and safe belief.
We conclude with an outlook toward logics for the dynamics of changing
evidence, and the resulting language extensions and connections with logics of
plausibility change
Localist but Distributed Representations
A number of examples are given of how localist models may incorporate distributed representations, without the types of non-local interactions that often render distributed models implausible. The need to analyze the information that is encoded by these representations is also emphasized as a metatheoretical constraint on model plausibility
Light aircraft sound transmission study
The plausibility of using the two microphone sound intensity technique to study noise transmission into light aircraft was investigated. In addition, a simple model to predict the interior sound pressure level of the cabin was constructed
- …