74,164 research outputs found
Dura
The reactive event processing language, that is developed in the context of this project, has been called DEAL in previous documents. When we chose this name for our language it has not been used by other authors working in the same research area (complex event processing). However, in the meantime it appears in publications of other authors and because we have not used the name in publications yet we cannot claim that we were the first to use it. In order to avoid ambiguities and name conflicts in future publications we decided to rename our language to Dura which stands for “Declarative uniform reactive event processing language”. Therefore the title of this deliverable has been updated to “Dura – Concepts and Examples”
Probability, propensity and probabilities of propensities (and of probabilities)
The process of doing Science in condition of uncertainty is illustrated with
a toy experiment in which the inferential and the forecasting aspects are both
present. The fundamental aspects of probabilistic reasoning, also relevant in
real life applications, arise quite naturally and the resulting discussion
among non-ideologized, free-minded people offers an opportunity for
clarifications.Comment: Invited contribution to the proceedings MaxEnt 2016 based on the talk
given at the workshop (Ghent, Belgium, 10-15 July 2016), supplemented by work
done within the program Probability and Statistics in Forensic Science at the
Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridg
Structurally Tractable Uncertain Data
Many data management applications must deal with data which is uncertain,
incomplete, or noisy. However, on existing uncertain data representations, we
cannot tractably perform the important query evaluation tasks of determining
query possibility, certainty, or probability: these problems are hard on
arbitrary uncertain input instances. We thus ask whether we could restrict the
structure of uncertain data so as to guarantee the tractability of exact query
evaluation. We present our tractability results for tree and tree-like
uncertain data, and a vision for probabilistic rule reasoning. We also study
uncertainty about order, proposing a suitable representation, and study
uncertain data conditioned by additional observations.Comment: 11 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. To appear in SIGMOD/PODS PhD Symposium
201
Confidence limits: what is the problem? Is there the solution?
This contribution to the debate on confidence limits focuses mostly on the
case of measurements with `open likelihood', in the sense that it is defined in
the text. I will show that, though a prior-free assessment of {\it confidence}
is, in general, not possible, still a search result can be reported in a mostly
unbiased and efficient way, which satisfies some desiderata which I believe are
shared by the people interested in the subject. The simpler case of `closed
likelihood' will also be treated, and I will discuss why a uniform prior on a
sensible quantity is a very reasonable choice for most applications. In both
cases, I think that much clarity will be achieved if we remove from scientific
parlance the misleading expressions `confidence intervals' and `confidence
levels'.Comment: 20 pages, 6 figures, using cernrepp.cls (included). Contribution to
the Workshop on Confidence Limits, CERN, Geneva, 17-18 January 2000. This
paper and related work are also available at
http://www-zeus.roma1.infn.it/~agostini/prob+stat.htm
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
As we are moving towards the Internet of Things (IoT), the number of sensors
deployed around the world is growing at a rapid pace. Market research has shown
a significant growth of sensor deployments over the past decade and has
predicted a significant increment of the growth rate in the future. These
sensors continuously generate enormous amounts of data. However, in order to
add value to raw sensor data we need to understand it. Collection, modelling,
reasoning, and distribution of context in relation to sensor data plays
critical role in this challenge. Context-aware computing has proven to be
successful in understanding sensor data. In this paper, we survey context
awareness from an IoT perspective. We present the necessary background by
introducing the IoT paradigm and context-aware fundamentals at the beginning.
Then we provide an in-depth analysis of context life cycle. We evaluate a
subset of projects (50) which represent the majority of research and commercial
solutions proposed in the field of context-aware computing conducted over the
last decade (2001-2011) based on our own taxonomy. Finally, based on our
evaluation, we highlight the lessons to be learnt from the past and some
possible directions for future research. The survey addresses a broad range of
techniques, methods, models, functionalities, systems, applications, and
middleware solutions related to context awareness and IoT. Our goal is not only
to analyse, compare and consolidate past research work but also to appreciate
their findings and discuss their applicability towards the IoT.Comment: IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials Journal, 201
- …