Dependency pairs for proving termination properties of conditional term rewriting systems

[EN] The notion of operational termination provides a logic-based definition of termination of computational systems as the absence of infinite inferences in the computational logic describing the operational semantics of the system. For Conditional Term Rewriting Systems we show that operational termination is characterized as the conjunction of two termination properties. One of them is traditionally called termination and corresponds to the absence of infinite sequences of rewriting steps (a horizontal dimension). The other property, that we call V-termination, concerns the absence of infinitely many attempts to launch the subsidiary processes that are required to perform a single rewriting step (a vertical dimension). We introduce appropriate notions of dependency pairs to characterize termination, V-termination, and operational termination of Conditional Term Rewriting Systems. This can be used to obtain a powerful and more expressive framework for proving termination properties of Conditional Term Rewriting Systems.Partially supported by the EU (FEDER), Spanish MINECO projects TIN 2013-45732-C4-1-P and TIN2015-69175-C4-1-R, GV project PROMETEOII/2015/013, and NSF grant CNS 13-19109. Salvador Lucas' research was partly developed during a sabbatical year at UIUCLucas Alba, S.; Meseguer, J. (2017). Dependency pairs for proving termination properties of conditional term rewriting systems. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming. 86(1):236-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2016.03.003S23626886

The 2D Dependency Pair Framework for Conditional Rewrite Systems¿Part II: Advanced Processors and Implementation Techniques

[EN] Proving termination of programs in `real-life¿ rewriting-based languages like CafeOBJ, Haskell, Maude, etc., is an important subject of research. To advance this goal, faithfully cap- turing the impact in the termination behavior of the main language features (e.g., conditions in program rules) is essential. In Part I of this work, we have introduced a 2D Dependency Pair Framework for automatically proving termination properties of Conditional Term Rewriting Systems. Our framework relies on the notion of processor as the main practical device to deal with proofs of termination properties of conditional rewrite systems. Processors are used to decompose and simplify the proofs in a divide and conquer approach. With the basic proof framework defined in Part I, here we introduce new processors to further improve the abil- ity of the 2D Dependency Pair Framework to deal with proofs of termination properties of conditional rewrite systems. We also discuss relevant implementation techniques to use such processors in practice.Partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and projects RTI2018-094403-B-C32, PROMETEO/2019/098, SP20180225. Jose Meseguer was supported by grants NSF CNS 13-19109 and NRL N00173-17-1-G002. Salvador Lucas' research was partly developed during a sabbatical year at the UIUC.Lucas Alba, S.; Meseguer, J.; Gutiérrez Gil, R. (2020). The 2D Dependency Pair Framework for Conditional Rewrite Systems¿Part II: Advanced Processors and Implementation Techniques. Journal of Automated Reasoning. 64(8):1611-1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-020-09542-3S16111662648Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 236(1–2), 133–178 (2000)Alarcón, B., Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S., Navarro-Marset, R.: Proving termination properties with MU-TERM. In: Proceedings of AMAST’10, LNCS, vol. 6486, pp. 201–208 (2011)Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and all That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Barwise, J.: An introduction to first-order logic. In: Barwise, J. (ed.) Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude—A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS 4350, Springer, New York (2007)Contejean, E., Marché, C., Tomás, A.-P., Urbain, X.: Mechanically proving termination using polynomial interpretations. J. Autom. Reason. 34(4), 325–363 (2006)Dershowitz, N.: A note on simplification orderings. Inf. Process. Lett. 9(5), 212–215 (1979)Durán, F., Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: MTT: the Maude termination tool (system description). In: Proceedings of IJCAR’08, LNAI, vol. 5195, pp. 313–319 (2008)Endrullis, J., Waldmann, J., Zantema, H.: Matrix interpretations for proving termination of term rewriting. J. Autom. Reason. 40(2–3), 195–220 (2008)Giesl, J., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R.: AProVE 1.2: Automatic Termination proofs in the dependency pair framework. In: Proceeding of IJCAR’06, LNAI, vol. 4130, pp. 281–286 (2006)Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P.: The dependency pair framework: combining techniques for automated termination proofs. In: Proceedings of LPAR’04, LNAI, vol. 3452, pp. 301–331 (2004)Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P., Falke, S.: Mechanizing and improving dependency pairs. J. Autom. Reason. 37(3), 155–203 (2006)Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Models and equality for logical programming. In: Proceedings of TAPSOFT’87, LNCS, vol. 250, pp. 1–22 (1987)Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S.: Automatic generation of logical models with AGES. In: Proceedings of CADE 2019, LNCS, vol. 11716, pp. 287–299 (2019). Tool page: http://zenon.dsic.upv.es/ages/Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Dependency pairs revisited. In: Proceedings of RTA’04, LNCS, vol. 3091, pp. 249–268 (2004)Hodges, W.: Elementary predicate logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 1, pp. 1–131. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1983)Lankford, D.S.: On proving term rewriting systems are noetherian. Technical Report, Louisiana Technological University, Ruston, LA (1979)Lucas, S.: Using Well-founded relations for proving operational termination. J. Autom. Reason. to appear (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-019-09514-2Lucas, S., Gutiérrez, R.: Automatic synthesis of logical models for order-sorted first-order theories. J. Autom. Reason. 60(4), 465–501 (2018)Lucas, S., Gutiérrez, R.: Use of logical models for proving infeasibility in term rewriting. Inf. Process. Lett. 136, 90–95 (2018)Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J.: Operational termination of conditional term rewriting systems. Inf. Process. Lett. 95, 446–453 (2005)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Models for logics and conditional constraints in automated proofs of termination. In: Proceedings of AISC’14, LNAI, vol. 8884, pp. 9–20 (2014)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: 2D Dependency pairs for proving operational termination of CTRSs. In: Escobar, S., (ed) Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Rewriting Logic and its Applications, WRLA’14, LNCS, vol. 8663, pp. 195–212 (2014)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Dependency pairs for proving termination properties of conditional term rewriting systems. J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. 86, 236–268 (2017)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Normal forms and normal theories in conditional rewriting. J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. 85(1), 67–97 (2016)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J., Gutiérrez, R.: Extending the 2D DP framework for conditional term rewriting systems. In: Selected Papers from LOPSTR’14, LNCS, vol. 8981, pp. 113–130 (2015)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J., Gutiérrez, R.: The 2D dependency pair framework for conditional rewrite systems. Part I: Definition and basic processors. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 96, 74–106 (2018)McCune, W.: Prover9 & Mace4. http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/prover9/ (2005–2010)Ohlebusch, E.: Advanced Topics in Term Rewriting. Springer, New York (2002)Schernhammer, F., Gramlich, B.: Characterizing and proving operational termination of deterministic conditional term rewriting systems. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 79, 659–688 (2010)Sternagel, T., Middeldorp, A.: Conditional confluence (system description). In: Proceedings of RTA-TLCA’14, LNCS, vol. f8560, pp. 456–465 (2014)Sternagel, T., Middeldorp, A.: Infeasible conditional critical pairs. In: Proceedings of IWC’15, pp. 13–18 (2014)Thiemann, R.: The DP Framework for Proving Termination of Term Rewriting. PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen, Technical Report AIB-2007-17 (2007)Thiemann, R., Giesl, J., Schneider-Kamp, P.: Improved modular termination proofs using dependency pairs. In: Proceedings of IJCAR’04, LNAI, vol. 3097, pp. 75–90 (2004)Wang, H.: Logic of many-sorted theories. J. Symb. Log. 17(2), 105–116 (1952

Fitting Semantics for Conditional Term Rewriting

This paper investigates the semantics of conditional term rewriting systems with negation which do not satisfy useful properties like termination. It is shown that the approach used by Fitting [5] for Prolog-style logic programs is applicable in this context. A monotone operator is developed, whose fixpoints describe the semantics of conditional rewriting. Several examples illustrate this semantics for non-terminating rewrite systems which could not be easily handled by previous approaches

2D Dependency Pairs for Proving Operational Termination of CTRSs

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12904-4_11The notion of *operational termination* captures nonterminating computations due to subsidiary processes that are necessary to issue a *single* `main' step but which often remain `hidden' when the main computation sequence is observed. This highlights *two dimensions* of nontermination: one for the infinite sequencing of computation steps, and the other that concerns the proof of some single steps. For conditional term rewriting systems (CTRSs), we introduce a new *dependency pair framework* which exploits the *bidimensional* nature of conditional rewriting (rewriting steps + satisfaction of the conditions as reachability problems) to obtain a powerful and more expressive framework for proving operational termination of CTRSs.Lucas Alba, S.; Meseguer, J. (2014). 2D Dependency Pairs for Proving Operational Termination of CTRSs. En Rewriting Logic and Its Applications. Springer Verlag (Germany). 195-212. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12904-4_11S19521

Strong and weak operational termination of order-sorted rewrite theories

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12904-4 10This paper presents several new results on conditional term rewriting within the general framework of order-sorted rewrite theories (OSRTs) which contains the more restricted framework of conditional term rewriting systems (CTRSs) as a special case. The results uncover some subtle issues about conditional termination. We first of all generalize a previous known result characterizing the operational termination of a CTRS by the quasi-decreasing ordering notion to a similar result for OSRTs. Second, we point out that the notions of *irreducible* term and of *normal form*, which coincide for unsorted rewriting are *totally different* for conditional rewriting and formally characterize that difference. We then define the notion of a *weakly operationally terminating* (or *weakly normalizing*) OSRT, give several evaluation mechanisms to compute normal forms in such theories, and investigate general conditions under which the rewriting-based operational semantics and the initial algebra semantics of a confluent OSRT coincide thanks to a notion of *canonical term algebra*. Finally, we investigate appropriate conditions and proof methods to ensure good executability properties of an OSRT for computing normal forms.Research partially supported by NSF grant CNS 13-19109. Salvador Lucas’ research was developed during a sabbatical year at the CS Dept. of the UIUC and was also partially supported by Spanish MECD grant PRX12/00214, MINECO project TIN2010-21062-C02-02, and GV grant BEST/2014/026 and project PROMETEO/2011/052.Lucas Alba, S.; Meseguer, J. (2014). Strong and weak operational termination of order-sorted rewrite theories. En Rewriting Logic and Its Applications. Springer Verlag (Germany). 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12904-4_10S17819

Using Well-Founded Relations for Proving Operational Termination

[EN] In this paper, we study operational termination, a proof theoretical notion for capturing the termination behavior of computational systems. We prove that operational termination can be characterized at different levels by means of well- founded relations on specific formulas which can be obtained from the considered system. We show how to obtain such well-founded relations from logical models which can be automatically generated using existing tools.Partially supported by the EU (FEDER), Projects TIN2015-69175-C4-1-R, and GV PROMETEOII/2015/013.Lucas Alba, S. (2020). Using Well-Founded Relations for Proving Operational Termination. Journal of Automated Reasoning. 64(2):167-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-019-09514-2S167195642Alarcón, B., Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S., Navarro-Marset, R.: Proving termination properties with MU-TERM. In: Proceedings of AMAST’10, LNCS, vol. 6486, pp. 201–208, Springer (2011)Aguirre, L., Martí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M., Pita, I.: Sentence-normalized conditional narrowing modulo in rewriting logic and Maude. J. Automat. Reason. 60(4), 421–463 (2018)Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Proving innermost normalisation automatically. In: Proceedings of RTA’97, LNCS, vol. 1232, pp. 157–171, Springer, Berlin (1997)Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 236(1–2), 133–178 (2000)Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude—A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350, Springer (2007)Durán, F., Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Methods for proving termination of rewriting-based programming languages by transformation. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 248, 93–113 (2009)Durán, F., Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J., Urbain, X.: Proving operational termination of membership equational programs. High. Order Symb. Comput. 21(1–2), 59–88 (2008)Falke, S., Kapur, D.: Operational termination of conditional rewriting with built-in numbers and semantic data structures. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 237, 75–90 (2009)Floyd, R.W.: Assigning meanings to programs. Math. Asp. Comput. Sci. 19, 19–32 (1967)Giesl, J., Arts, T.: Verification of Erlang processes by dependency pairs. Appl. Algebra Eng. Commun. Comput. 12, 39–72 (2001)Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P., Falke, S.: Mechanizing and improving dependency pairs. J. Autom. Reason. 37(3), 155–203 (2006)Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P.: The dependency pair framework: combining techniques for automated termination proofs. In: Proceedings of LPAR’04, LNAI, vol. 3452, pp. 301–331 (2004)Giesl, J., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R.: AProVE 1.2: automatic termination proofs in the dependency pair framework. In: Proceedings of IJCAR’06, LNAI, vol. 4130, pp. 281–286 (2006)Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Models and equality for logical programming. In: Proceedings of TAPSOFT’87, LNCS, vol. 250, pp. 1–22 (1987)Goguen, J., Meseguer, J.: Order-sorted algebra I: equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 105, 217–273 (1992)Gutiérrez, R., Lucas, S., Reinoso, P.: A tool for the automatic generation of logical models of order-sorted first-order theories. In: Proceedings of PROLE’16, pp. 215–230 (2016)Hodges, W.: Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)Korp, M., Sternagel, C., Zankl, H., Middeldorp, A.: Tyrolean termination tool 2. In: Proceedings of RTA 2009, LNCS, vol. 5595, pp. 295–304 (2009)Lalement, R.: Computation as Logic. Masson-Prentice Hall International, Paris (1993)Lucas, S.: Context-sensitive rewriting strategies. Inf. Comput. 178(1), 294–343 (2002)Lucas, S.: Use of logical models for proving operational termination in general logics. In: Selected Papers from WRLA’16, LNCS, vol. 9942, pp. 1–21 (2016)Lucas, S.: Directions of operational termination. In: Proceedings of PROLE’18. http://hdl.handle.net/11705/PROLE/2018/009 (2018). Accessed 9 Feb 2019Lucas, S., Gutiérrez, R.: Automatic synthesis of logical models for order-sorted first-order theories. J. Autom. Reason. 60(4), 465–501 (2018)Lucas, S., Gutiérrez, R.: Use of logical models for proving infeasibility in term rewriting. Inf. Process. Lett. 136, 90–95 (2018)Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J.: Operational termination of conditional term rewriting systems. Inf. Process. Lett. 95, 446–453 (2005)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Dependency pairs for proving termination properties of conditional term rewriting systems. J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. 86, 236–268 (2017)Lucas, S., Meseguer, J.: Proving operational termination of declarative programs in general logics. In: Proceedings of PPDP’14, pp. 111–122. ACM Digital Library (2014)McCune, W.: Prover9 & Mace4. http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/prover9/ (2005–2010). Accessed 9 Feb 2019Mendelson, E.: Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th edn. Chapman & Hall, London (1997)Meseguer, J.: General logics. In: Logic Colloquium’87, pp. 275–329 (1989)O’Donnell, M.J.: Equational Logic as a Programming Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Ohlebusch, E.: Advanced Topics in Term Rewriting. Springer, Berlin (2002)Prawitz, D.: Natural Deduction. A Proof Theoretical Study. Almqvist & Wiksell, 1965. Reprinted by Dover Publications (2006)Rosu, G., Stefanescu, A., Ciobaca, S., Moore, B.M.: One-path reachability logic. In: Proceedings of LICS 2013, pp. 358–367. IEEE Press (2013)Shapiro, S.: Foundations Without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)Schernhammer, F., Gramlich, B.: Characterizing and proving operational termination of deterministic conditional term rewriting systems. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 79, 659–688 (2010)Serbanuta, T., Rosu, G.: Computationally equivalent elimination of conditions. In: Proceedings of RTA’06, LNCS, vol. 4098, pp. 19–34. Springer, Berlin (2006)Turing, A.M.: Checking a large routine. In: Report of a Conference on High Speed Automatic Calculating Machines, Univ. Math. Lab., Cambridge, pp. 67–69 (1949

Combining Runtime Checking and Slicing to Improve Maude Error Diagnosis

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23165-5_3This paper introduces the idea of using assertion checking for enhancing the dynamic slicing of Maude computation traces. Since trace slicing can greatly simplify the size and complexity of the analyzed traces, our methodology can be useful for improving the diagnosis of erroneous Maude programs. The proposed methodology is based on (i) a logical notation for specifying two types of user-defined assertions that are imposed on execution runs: functional assertions and system assertions; (ii) a runtime checking technique that dynamically tests the assertions and is provably safe in the sense that all errors flagged are definite violations of the specifications; and (iii) a mechanism based on equational least general generalization that automatically derives accurate criteria for slicing from falsified assertions.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MINECO project ref. TIN2013-45732-C4-01 (DAMAS), and by Generalitat Valenciana ref. PROMETEOII/2015/013 (SmartLogic). F. Frechina was supported by FPU-ME grant AP2010-5681, and J. Sapiña was supported by FPI-UPV grant SP2013-0083.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Frechina Navarro, F.; Sapiña Sanchis, J. (2015). Combining Runtime Checking and Slicing to Improve Maude Error Diagnosis. En Logic, Rewriting, and Concurrency. Essays Dedicated to José Meseguer on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23165-5_3S7296Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Espert, J., Romero, D.: Backward trace slicing for rewriting logic theories. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6803, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Romero, D.: Backward trace slicing for conditional rewrite theories. In: Bjørner, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-18 2012. LNCS, vol. 7180, pp. 62–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Romero, D.: Julienne: a trace slicer for conditional rewrite theories. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 28–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Romero, D.: Using conditional trace slicing for improving Maude programs. Sci. Comput. Program. 80, Part B:385–415 (2014)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Sapiña, J.: Slicing-based trace analysis of rewriting logic specifications with $$I$$ Julienne. In: Felleisen, M., Gardner, P. (eds.) ESOP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7792, pp. 121–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Sapiña, J.: Inspecting rewriting logic computations (in a Parametric and Stepwise Way). In: Iida, S., Meseguer, J., Ogata, K. (eds.) Specification, Algebra, and Software. LNCS, vol. 8373, pp. 229–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Sapiña, J.: Debugging Maude programs via runtime assertion checking and trace slicing. Technical report, Department of Computer Systems and Computation, Universitat Politècnica de València (2015). http://safe-tools.dsic.upv.es/abets/abets-tr.pdfAlpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Sapiña, J.: Exploring conditional rewriting logic computations. J. Symbolic Comput. 69, 3–39 (2015)Alpuente, M., Escobar, S., Espert, J., Meseguer, J.: A modular order-sorted equational generalization algorithm. Inf. Comput. 235, 98–136 (2014)Baader, F., Snyder, W.: Unification Theory. In: Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. I, pp. 447–533. Elsevier Science (2001)Bruni, R., Meseguer, J.: Semantic foundations for generalized rewrite theories. Theor. Comput. Sci. 360(1–3), 386–414 (2006)Clarke, L.A., Rosenblum, D.S.: A historical perspective on runtime assertion checking in software development. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 31(3), 25–37 (2006)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: Maude Manual (Version 2.6). Technical report, SRI International Computer Science Laboratory (2011). http://maude.cs.uiuc.edu/maude2-manual/Durán, F., Meseguer, J.: A Maude coherence checker tool for conditional order-sorted rewrite theories. In: Ölveczky, P.C. (ed.) WRLA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6381, pp. 86–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Durán, F., Roldán, M., Vallecillo, A.: Invariant-driven strategies for Maude. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 124(2), 17–28 (2005)Goguen, J.A., Meseguer, J.: Equality, types, modules, and (why not?) generics for logic programming. J. Logic Program. 1(2), 179–210 (1984)Goguen, J.A., Meseguer, J.: Unifying functional, object-oriented and relational programming with logical semantics. In: Agha, G., Wegner, P., Yonezawa, A. (eds.), Research Directions in Object-Oriented Programming, pp. 417–478. The MIT Press (1987)Klop, J.W.: Term rewriting systems. In: Abramsky, S., Gabbay, D., Maibaum, T. (eds.), Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, vol. I, pp. 1–112. Oxford University Press (1992)Korel, B., Laski, J.: Dynamic program slicing. Inf. Process. Lett. 29(3), 155–163 (1988)Lassez, J.L., Maher, M.J., Marriott, K.: Unification Revisited. In: Minker, J. (ed.) Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pp. 587–625. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California (1988)Leavens, G.T., Cheon, Y.: Design by Contract with JML (2005). http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/ leavens/JML/jmldbc.pdfMartí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M., Verdejo, A.: Rewriting logic bibliography by topic: 1990–2011. J. Logic Algebraic Program. 81(7–8), 782–815 (2012)Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 96(1), 73–155 (1992)Meseguer, J.: Multiparadigm logic programming. In: Kirchner, H., Levi, G. (eds.) ALP 1992. LNCS, vol. 632, pp. 158–200. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)Rocha, C., Meseguer, J., Muñoz, C.: Rewriting modulo SMT and open system analysis. In: Escobar, S. (ed.) WRLA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8663, pp. 247–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Roşu, G.: From Rewriting Logic, to Programming Language Semantics, to Program Verification. In: Martí-Oliet, N., Ölveczky, P.C., Talcott, C., (eds.) Logic, Rewriting, and Concurrency. LNCS, vol. 9200, pp. 598–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Roldán, M., Durán, F., Vallecillo, A.: Invariant-driven specifications in Maude. Sci. Comput. Program. 74(10), 812–835 (2009)TeReSe. Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press (2003

A Finite Representation of the Narrowing Space

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14125-1_4Narrowing basically extends rewriting by allowing free variables in terms and by replacing matching with unification. As a consequence, the search space of narrowing becomes usually infinite, as in logic programming. In this paper, we introduce the use of some operators that allow one to always produce a finite data structure that still represents all the narrowing derivations. Furthermore, we extract from this data structure a novel, compact equational representation of the (possibly infinite) answers computed by narrowing for a given initial term. Both the finite data structure and the equational representation of the computed answers might be useful in a number of areas, like program comprehension, static analysis, program transformation, etc.Nishida, N.; Vidal, G. (2013). A Finite Representation of the Narrowing Space. En Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation. Springer. 54-71. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14125-1_4S5471Albert, E., Vidal, G.: The Narrowing-Driven Approach to Functional Logic Program Specialization. New Generation Computing 20(1), 3–26 (2002)Alpuente, M., Falaschi, M., Vidal, G.: Partial Evaluation of Functional Logic Programs. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 20(4), 768–844 (1998)Alpuente, M., Falaschi, M., Vidal, G.: Compositional Analysis for Equational Horn Programs. In: Rodríguez-Artalejo, M., Levi, G. (eds.) ALP 1994. LNCS, vol. 850, pp. 77–94. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Antoy, S., Ariola, Z.: Narrowing the Narrowing Space. In: Hartel, P.H., Kuchen, H. (eds.) PLILP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1292, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theoretical Computer Science 236(1–2), 133–178 (2000)Arts, T., Zantema, H.: Termination of Logic Programs Using Semantic Unification. In: Proietti, M. (ed.) LOPSTR 1995. LNCS, vol. 1048, pp. 219–233. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press (1998)Bae, K., Escobar, S., Meseguer, J.: Abstract Logical Model Checking of Infinite-State Systems Using Narrowing. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications. LIPIcs, vol. 21, pp. 81–96. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)De Schreye, D., Glück, R., Jørgensen, J., Leuschel, M., Martens, B., Sørensen, M.: Conjunctive partial deduction: foundations, control, algorihtms, and experiments. Journal of Logic Programming 41(2&3), 231–277 (1999)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: A rewriting-based inference system for the NRL Protocol Analyzer and its meta-logical properties. Theoretical Computer Science 367(1–2), 162–202 (2006)Escobar, S., Meseguer, J.: Symbolic Model Checking of Infinite-State Systems Using Narrowing. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 153–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Fribourg, L.: SLOG: A Logic Programming Language Interpreter Based on Clausal Superposition and Rewriting. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Logic Programming, pp. 172–185. IEEE Press (1985)Gnaedig, I., Kirchner, H.: Proving weak properties of rewriting. Theoretical Computer Science 412(34), 4405–4438 (2011)Hanus, M.: The integration of functions into logic programming: From theory to practice. Journal of Logic Programming 19&20, 583–628 (1994)Hanus, M. (ed.): Curry: An integrated functional logic language (vers. 0.8.3) (2012). http://www.curry-language.orgHermenegildo, M., Rossi, F.: On the Correctness and Efficiency of Independent And-Parallelism in Logic Programs. In: Lusk, E., Overbeck, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1989 North American Conf. on Logic Programming, pp. 369–389. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)Hölldobler, S. (ed.): Foundations of Equational Logic Programming. LNCS, vol. 353. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)Meseguer, J., Thati, P.: Symbolic Reachability Analysis Using Narrowing and its Application to Verification of Cryptographic Protocols. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 117, 153–182 (2005)Middeldorp, A., Okui, S.: A Deterministic Lazy Narrowing Calculus. Journal of Symbolic Computation 25(6), 733–757 (1998)Nishida, N., Sakai, M., Sakabe, T.: Generation of Inverse Computation Programs of Constructor Term Rewriting Systems. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems J88–D–I(8), 1171–1183 (2005) (in Japanese)Nishida, N., Sakai, M., Sakabe, T.: Partial Inversion of Constructor Term Rewriting Systems. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, pp. 264–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Nishida, N., Vidal, G.: Program inversion for tail recursive functions. In: Schmidt-Schauß, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications. LIPIcs, vol. 10, pp. 283–298. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011)Nishida, N., Vidal, G.: Computing More Specific Versions of Conditional Rewriting Systems. In: Albert, E. (ed.) LOPSTR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7844, pp. 137–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Nutt, W., Réty, P., Smolka, G.: Basic Narrowing Revisited. Journal of Symbolic Computation 7(3/4), 295–317 (1989)Ohlebusch, E.: Advanced Topics in Term Rewriting. Springer, London, UK (2002)Palamidessi, C.: Algebraic Properties of Idempotent Substitutions. In: Paterson, M. (ed.) ICALP 1990. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 386–399. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)Ramos, J.G., Silva, J., Vidal, G.: Fast Narrowing-Driven Partial Evaluation for Inductively Sequential Systems. In: Danvy, O., Pierce, B.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 228–239. ACM Press (2005)Slagle, J.R.: Automated theorem-proving for theories with simplifiers, commutativity and associativity. Journal of the ACM 21(4), 622–642 (1974

Inspecting rewriting logic computations (in a parametric and stepwise way)

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54624-2_12Trace inspection is concerned with techniques that allow the trace content to be searched for specific components. This paper presents a rich and highly dynamic, parameterized technique for the trace inspection of Rewriting Logic theories that allows the non-deterministic execution of a given unconditional rewrite theory to be followed up in different ways. Using this technique, an analyst can browse, slice, filter, or search the traces as they come to life during the program execution. Starting from a selected state in the computation tree, the navigation of the trace is driven by a user-defined, inspection criterion that specifies the required exploration mode. By selecting different inspection criteria, one can automatically derive a family of practical algorithms such as program steppers and more sophisticated dynamic trace slicers that facilitate the dynamic detection of control and data dependencies across the computation tree. Our methodology, which is implemented in the Anima graphical tool, allows users to capture the impact of a given criterion thereby facilitating the detection of improper program behaviors.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER), the Spanish MEC project ref. TIN2010-21062-C02-02, the Spanish MICINN complementary action ref. TIN2009-07495-E, and by Generalitat Valenciana ref. PROMETEO2011/052. This work was carried out during the tenure of D. Ballis’ ERCIM “Alain Bensoussan ”Postdoctoral Fellowship. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n. 246016. F. Frechina was supported by FPU-ME grant AP2010-5681.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Frechina, F.; Sapiña Sanchis, J. (2014). Inspecting rewriting logic computations (in a parametric and stepwise way). En Specification, algebra, and software: essays dedicated to Kokichi Futatsugi. Springer Verlag (Germany). 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54624-2_12S229255Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Baggi, M., Falaschi, M.: A Fold/Unfold Transformation Framework for Rewrite Theories extended to CCT. In: Proc. PEPM 2010, pp. 43–52. ACM (2010)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Espert, J., Romero, D.: Model-checking Web Applications with Web-TLR. In: Bouajjani, A., Chin, W.-N. (eds.) ATVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6252, pp. 341–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Espert, J., Romero, D.: Backward Trace Slicing for Rewriting Logic Theories. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6803, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Sapiña, J.: Slicing-Based Trace Analysis of Rewriting Logic Specifications with iJulienne. In: Felleisen, M., Gardner, P. (eds.) ESOP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7792, pp. 121–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Frechina, F., Romero, D.: Using Conditional Trace Slicing for improving Maude programs. Science of Computer Programming (2013) (to appear)Alpuente, M., Ballis, D., Romero, D.: A Rewriting Logic Approach to the Formal Specification and Verification of Web applications. Science of Computer Programming (2013) (to appear)Baggi, M., Ballis, D., Falaschi, M.: Quantitative Pathway Logic for Computational Biology. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) CMSB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5688, pp. 68–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Bruni, R., Meseguer, J.: Semantic Foundations for Generalized Rewrite Theories. Theoretical Computer Science 360(1-3), 386–414 (2006)Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: Maude Manual (Version 2.6). Technical report, SRI Int’l Computer Science Laboratory (2011), http://maude.cs.uiuc.edu/maude2-manual/Clements, J., Flatt, M., Felleisen, M.: Modeling an Algebraic Stepper. In: Sands, D. (ed.) ESOP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2028, pp. 320–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Durán, F., Meseguer, J.: A Maude Coherence Checker Tool for Conditional Order-Sorted Rewrite Theories. In: Ölveczky, P.C. (ed.) WRLA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6381, pp. 86–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Eker, S.: Associative-Commutative Matching via Bipartite Graph Matching. The Computer Journal 38(5), 381–399 (1995)Eker, S.: Associative-Commutative Rewriting on Large Terms. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 14–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Klop, J.W.: Term Rewriting Systems. In: Abramsky, S., Gabbay, D., Maibaum, T. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, vol. I, pp. 1–112. Oxford University Press (1992)Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J.: Rewriting Logic: Roadmap and Bibliography. Theoretical Computer Science 285(2), 121–154 (2002)Meseguer, J.: Conditional Rewriting Logic as a Unified Model of Concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science 96(1), 73–155 (1992)Meseguer, J.: The Temporal Logic of Rewriting: A Gentle Introduction. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Montanari Festschrift. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 354–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Plotkin, G.D.: The Origins of Structural Operational Semantics. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 60-61(1), 3–15 (2004)Riesco, A., Verdejo, A., Caballero, R., Martí-Oliet, N.: Declarative Debugging of Rewriting Logic Specifications. In: Corradini, A., Montanari, U. (eds.) WADT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5486, pp. 308–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Riesco, A., Verdejo, A., Martí-Oliet, N.: Declarative Debugging of Missing Answers for Maude. In: Proc. RTA 2010. LIPIcs, vol. 6, pp. 277–294 (2010)TeReSe. Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press (2003