Κατηγοριοποίηση και περιληπτικές αποδόσεις εργασιών συνεδρίων της ACM SIGCSE

Η παρούσα εργασία αφορά στη μελέτη εργασιών οι οποίες παρουσιάστηκαν στο συνέδριο ACM SIGCSE τις χρονιές 2016, 2017 και 2018. Αρχικά, γίνεται μια κατηγοριοποίηση, με βάση τον κύριο τομέα της Εκπαίδευσης της Πληροφορικής τον οποίο αφορά η κάθε εργασία που παρουσιάστηκε στα προαναφερθέντα συνέδρια. Οι κατηγορίες στις οποίες κατατάχθηκαν τα άρθρα είναι οι εξής: • Αξιολόγηση σπουδαστών • Ασφάλεια και προστασία της ιδιωτικής ζωής • Διαδραστικά περιβάλλοντα μάθησης • Διαφορετικότητα των φύλων/ Πολυπολιτισμικότητα • Εκπαίδευση της Μηχανικής Λογισμικού • Εισαγωγή στην Πληροφορική • Εκπαίδευση της Πληροφορικής • Ενσωμάτωση Πληροφορίας • Ηλεκτρονική μάθηση • Οπτικοποίηση • Πρότυπα αναλυτικά προγράμματα • Πρωτοβάθμια και Δευτεροβάθμια Εκπαίδευση • Συνεργατική Μάθηση • Συστήματα διαχείρισης μάθησης • Υπολογιστική Σκέψη • Υπολογιστικός Αλφαβητισμός Στη συνέχεια, δίνονται περιληπτικές αποδόσεις των εργασιών της χρονιάς 2017 που εμπίπτουν στις παρακάτω επιλεγμένες κατηγορίες: • Αξιολόγηση φοιτητών/μαθητών • Εισαγωγή στην Πληροφορική • Εκπαίδευση της Πληροφορικής • Πρωτοβάθμια και Δευτεροβάθμια Εκπαίδευση • Συνεργατική Μάθηση • Υπολογιστική ΣκέψηThis thesis focuses on the study of papers presented at the ACM SIGCSE conference in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. Initially, a categorization is defined, based on the main areas of IT education that are included in the aforementioned conferences. The categories in which the articles were classified are: • Student evaluation • Security and Privacy • Interactive learning environments • Gender Diversity / Multiculturalism • Software engineering education • CS1 • Computer Science Education • Integration of Information • E-learning • Visualization • Model curricula • K-12 • Collaborative learning • Computational Thinking • Computing Literacy Afterwards, reviews of the papers of the year 2017 are presented concerning the following categories: • Student evaluation • CS1 • Computer Science Education • K-12 • Collaborative learning • Computational Thinkin

CAMAU Project: Research Report (April 2018)

‘Learning about Progression’ is a suite of research-based resources designed to provide evidence to support the building of learning progression frameworks in Wales. ‘Learning about Progression’ seeks to deepen our understanding of current thinking about progression and to explore different purposes that progression frameworks can serve to improve children and young people’s learning. These resources include consideration of how this evidence relates to current developments in Wales and derives a series of principles to serve as touchstones to make sure that, as practices begin to develop, they stay true to the original aspirations of A Curriculum for Wales – A Curriculum for Life. It also derives, from the review of evidence, a number of fundamental questions for all those involved in the development of progression frameworks to engage

CAMAU Project: Research Report (April 2018)

‘Learning about Progression’ is a suite of research-based resources designed to provide evidence to support the building of learning progression frameworks in Wales. ‘Learning about Progression’ seeks to deepen our understanding of current thinking about progression and to explore different purposes that progression frameworks can serve to improve children and young people’s learning. These resources include consideration of how this evidence relates to current developments in Wales and derives a series of principles to serve as touchstones to make sure that, as practices begin to develop, they stay true to the original aspirations of A Curriculum for Wales – A Curriculum for Life. It also derives, from the review of evidence, a number of fundamental questions for all those involved in the development of progression frameworks to engage

Berlin-Brandenburger Beitraege zur Bildungsforschung 2022

Die Reihe »Berlin-Brandenburger Beiträge zur Bildungsforschung« bietet ein Forum zur Veröffentlichung von Studien aus der empirischen Bildungsforschung. Der Fokus liegt auf Arbeiten mit besonderem Bezug zum Raum Berlin und Brandenburg. Dabei finden qualitative und quantitative Zugänge gleichermaßen Berücksichtigung

The synthesis of a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school computing

In recent decades, several countries have applied a resurgent focus to high-school computer science in the hope that it will provide the foundations for strong and innovative national IT sectors. The UK is one example undertaking this transition, and experiencing the associated challenges placed on the teaching community. In parallel, recent years have seen a trend towards enriching education with digital resources, specifically e-learning software. This study offers a practical contribution to the computer science teaching community by supporting the provision of e-learning software, and hence the increased use of e-learning in high-school teaching. However, it recognises that there remains a concern over the inconsistent pedagogical quality of many e-learning implementations. To safeguard the pedagogical quality of e-learning software, this study offers a research contribution by defining: (1) a comprehensive set of pedagogical heuristics to inform the design of e-learning software; (2) an associated e-learning evaluation protocol to guide the evaluation and selection of e-learning software for use in schools; and in doing so, (3) contributes to the under-researched area of high- school computing pedagogy. The proposed pedagogy synthesises a vast body of knowledge on learning theories into a comprehensive, yet accessible, set of heuristics. These heuristics supplement existing literature by focusing more tightly and in depth on pedagogy, rather than usability. The pedagogy synthesises the following learning theories: constructivism, social constructivism, connectivism, and cognitive load, and additionally gives pedagogical focus to VARK learning styles, ARCS motivational design, collaborative learning, gamification, and computational thinking. The e-learning evaluation protocol builds upon existing best practice in evaluation procedures but is unique in its characteristics and focus. The study follows a rigorous three phase mixed methods exploratory design in which the e-learning pedagogy and evaluation protocol were explored and iteratively developed in concert with input and evaluation from education experts and teachers. In parallel, practice-based input was secured via student usage of prototype e-learning software designed in adherence to the pedagogy. The findings of this research offer preliminary validation of the appropriateness and comprehensiveness of the e- learning pedagogy, and the final phase demonstrates statistically significant learning increases based on student usage of the e-learning software prototype. Additionally, this research offers preliminary validation of the reliability and validity of the evaluation protocol. Building on the findings of this research, several possibilities are outlined to further empirically establish this research, or develop it further into new avenues