Intensifying university industry collaboration through technology sharing within the Malaysian perspective

Innovation is the cornerstone of success for economic advancement primarily in emerging countries. Malaysia resorts to both universities and industries to collaborate in a more engaging, coherent and concentrated mode to accelerate innovation growth. Despite the myriad of collaborations, the return of investments has been marginal. This illustrates a mismatch between the demands of both the university and industry. On that grounds, it is important to address this research gap, for it will provide insights to improve universities’ and industries’ understanding in intensifying University Industry Collaborations to spur innovation. The significant contribution of this study is the emerged framework that establishes vital insights on the need to understand the economic landscape and placing technology sharing as a multiplying factor for th e intensification of UIC. The purpose of this study is to identify variables which foster University Industry Collaborations. This study further measures the outcome from Technology Sharing efforts on knowledge, performance, and competitiveness improvements in a University Industry Collaboration. Substantially this study develops and evaluates the framework on intensifying the University Industry Collaboration landscape. The conceptual theoretical framework was tested using empirical data gathered from 80 Small and Medium manufacturing companies, 20 Public Universities, and 41 Anchor manufacturing companies, through survey questionnaires. The fostering and multiplying factors were analysed using frequency analysis to reorient and capsulate variables associated to research objectives, and weightages to illustrate the intensity of the respondent companies’ contribution to the economic value chain. Further inferential statistics were applied to determine statistical evidence on the outcomes of technology sharing on knowledge, performance and competitiveness improvement. Mathematical modelling was also used to scientifically represent and evaluate the framework. The results revealed that appropriate research infrastructure, incentives to collaborate, and the need to understand the economic landscape were fundamental variables to industries meanwhile, universities pointed out the importance of human capital to do research and industry willingness as the primary factors in fostering collaboration. The results further revealed that Technology Sharing improved knowledge and performance for Anchor companies meanwhile, competitiveness also improved for Small and Medium manufacturing companies. Importantly, through the mathematical model, results revealed Technology Sharing as an important multiplying factor that intensifies University Industry Collaboration. It is paramount for University Industry Collaborations to be demanddriven and augmented with an understanding of significant fostering factors. With the purpose of intensifying University Industry Collaborations, Technology Sharing acts as an epilogue. The multiplying factor magnifies the collaboration to create a robust outcome. Technology Sharing proofs to drive private investments and allow knowledge, performance, and competitiveness improvement of industries in view of continuous innovation development within the economic landscape

Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn't)

The integration of digital technology confronts teachers, educators and researchers with many questions. What is the potential of ICT for learning and teaching, and which factors are decisive in making it work in the mathematics classroom? To investigate these questions, six cases from leading studies in the field are described, and decisive success factors are identified. This leads to the conclusion that crucial factors for the success of digital technology in mathematics education include the design of the digital tool and corresponding tasks exploiting the tool's pedagogical potential, the role of the teacher and the educational context

A Proposal for Supply Chain Management Research That Matters: Sixteen High Priority Research Projects for the Future

On May 4th, 2016 in Milton, Ontario, the World Class Supply Chain 2016 Summit was held in partnership between CN Rail and Wilfrid Laurier University’s Lazaridis School of Business & Economics to realize an ambitious goal: raise knowledge of contemporary supply chain management (SCM) issues through genuine peer-­‐to-­‐peer dialogue among practitioners and scholars. A principal element of that knowledge is an answer to the question: to gain valid and reliable insights for attaining SCM excellence, what issues must be researched further? This White Paper—which is the second of the summit’s two White Papers—addresses the question by proposing a research agenda comprising 16 research projects. This research agenda covers the following: The current state of research knowledge on issues that are of the highest priority to today’s SCM professionals Important gaps in current research knowledge and, consequently, the major questions that should be answered in sixteen future research projects aimed at addressing those gaps Ways in which the research projects can be incorporated into student training and be supported by Canada’s major research funding agencies That content comes from using the summit’s deliberations to guide systematic reviews of both the SCM research literature and Canadian institutional mechanisms that are geared towards building knowledge through research. The major conclusions from those reviews can be summarized as follows: While the research literature to date has yielded useful insights to inform the pursuit of SCM excellence, several research questions of immense practical importance remain unanswered or, at best, inadequately answered The body of research required to answer those questions will have to focus on what the summit’s first White Paper presented as four highly impactful levers that SCM executives must expertly handle to attain excellence: collaboration; information; technology; and talent The proposed research agenda can be pursued in ways that achieve the two inter-­‐related goals of creating new actionable knowledge and building the capacity of today’s students to become tomorrow’s practitioners and contributors to ongoing knowledge growth in the SCM field This White Paper’s details underlying these conclusions build on the information presented in the summit’s first White Paper. That is, while the first White Paper (White Paper 1) identified general SCM themes for which the research needs are most urgent, this White Paper goes further along the path of industry-academia knowledge co-creation. It does so by examining and articulating those needs against the backdrop of available research findings, translating the needs into specific research projects that should be pursued, and providing guidelines for how those projects can be carried out

Forum Session at the First International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC03)

The First International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC) was held in Trento, December 15-18, 2003. The focus of the conference ---Service Oriented Computing (SOC)--- is the new emerging paradigm for distributed computing and e-business processing that has evolved from object-oriented and component computing to enable building agile networks of collaborating business applications distributed within and across organizational boundaries. Of the 181 papers submitted to the ICSOC conference, 10 were selected for the forum session which took place on December the 16th, 2003. The papers were chosen based on their technical quality, originality, relevance to SOC and for their nature of being best suited for a poster presentation or a demonstration. This technical report contains the 10 papers presented during the forum session at the ICSOC conference. In particular, the last two papers in the report ere submitted as industrial papers

The Community Structure of R&D Cooperation in Europe. Evidence from a social network perspective

The focus of this paper is on pre-competitive R&D cooperation across Europe, as captured by R&D joint ventures funded by the European Commission in the time period 1998-2002, within the 5th Framework Program. The cooperations in this Framework Program give rise to a bipartite network with 72,745 network edges between 25,839 actors (representing organizations that include firms, universities, research organizations and public agencies) and 9,490 R&D projects. With this construction, participating actors are linked only through joint projects. In this paper we describe the community identification problem based on the concept of modularity, and use the recently introduced label-propagation algorithm to identify communities in the network, and differentiate the identified communities by developing community-specific profiles using social network analysis and geographic visualization techniques. We expect the results to enrich our picture of the European Research Area by providing new insights into the global and local structures of R&D cooperation across Europe

Self-Evaluation Applied Mathematics 2003-2008 University of Twente

This report contains the self-study for the research assessment of the Department of Applied Mathematics (AM) of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS) at the University of Twente (UT). The report provides the information for the Research Assessment Committee for Applied Mathematics, dealing with mathematical sciences at the three universities of technology in the Netherlands. It describes the state of affairs pertaining to the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2008

Next steps in implementing Kaput's research programme

We explore some key constructs and research themes initiated by Jim Kaput, and attempt to illuminate them further with reference to our own research. These 'design principles' focus on the evolution of digital representations since the early nineties, and we attempt to take forward our collective understanding of the cognitive and cultural affordances they offer. There are two main organising ideas for the paper. The first centres around Kaput's notion of outsourcing of processing power, and explores the implications of this for mathematical learning. We argue that a key component for design is to create visible, transparent views of outsourcing, a transparency without which there may be as many pitfalls as opportunities for mathematical learning. The second organising idea is that of communication, a key notion for Kaput, and the importance of designing for communication in ways that recognise the mutual influence of tools for communication and for mathematical expression