383 research outputs found
Tracking Data-Flow with Open Closure Types
Type systems hide data that is captured by function closures in function
types. In most cases this is a beneficial design that favors simplicity and
compositionality. However, some applications require explicit information about
the data that is captured in closures. This paper introduces open closure
types, that is, function types that are decorated with type contexts. They are
used to track data-flow from the environment into the function closure. A
simply-typed lambda calculus is used to study the properties of the type theory
of open closure types. A distinctive feature of this type theory is that an
open closure type of a function can vary in different type contexts. To present
an application of the type theory, it is shown that a type derivation
establishes a simple non-interference property in the sense of information-flow
theory. A publicly available prototype implementation of the system can be used
to experiment with type derivations for example programs.Comment: Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (2013
Property Theories
Revised and reprinted; originally in Dov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume IV. Kluwer 133-251. -- Two sorts of property theory are distinguished, those dealing with intensional contexts property abstracts (infinitive and gerundive phrases) and proposition abstracts (‘that’-clauses) and those dealing with predication (or instantiation) relations. The first is deemed to be epistemologically more primary, for “the argument from intensional logic” is perhaps the best argument for the existence of properties. This argument is presented in the course of discussing generality, quantifying-in, learnability, referential semantics, nominalism, conceptualism, realism, type-freedom, the first-order/higher-order controversy, names, indexicals, descriptions, Mates’ puzzle, and the paradox of analysis. Two first-order intensional logics are then formulated. Finally, fixed-point type-free theories of predication are discussed, especially their relation to the question whether properties may be identified with propositional functions
Predicativity, the Russell-Myhill Paradox, and Church's Intensional Logic
This paper sets out a predicative response to the Russell-Myhill paradox of
propositions within the framework of Church's intensional logic. A predicative
response places restrictions on the full comprehension schema, which asserts
that every formula determines a higher-order entity. In addition to motivating
the restriction on the comprehension schema from intuitions about the stability
of reference, this paper contains a consistency proof for the predicative
response to the Russell-Myhill paradox. The models used to establish this
consistency also model other axioms of Church's intensional logic that have
been criticized by Parsons and Klement: this, it turns out, is due to resources
which also permit an interpretation of a fragment of Gallin's intensional
logic. Finally, the relation between the predicative response to the
Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions and the Russell paradox of sets is
discussed, and it is shown that the predicative conception of set induced by
this predicative intensional logic allows one to respond to the Wehmeier
problem of many non-extensions.Comment: Forthcoming in The Journal of Philosophical Logi
A Lambda Term Representation Inspired by Linear Ordered Logic
We introduce a new nameless representation of lambda terms inspired by
ordered logic. At a lambda abstraction, number and relative position of all
occurrences of the bound variable are stored, and application carries the
additional information where to cut the variable context into function and
argument part. This way, complete information about free variable occurrence is
available at each subterm without requiring a traversal, and environments can
be kept exact such that they only assign values to variables that actually
occur in the associated term. Our approach avoids space leaks in interpreters
that build function closures.
In this article, we prove correctness of the new representation and present
an experimental evaluation of its performance in a proof checker for the
Edinburgh Logical Framework.
Keywords: representation of binders, explicit substitutions, ordered
contexts, space leaks, Logical Framework.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2011, arXiv:1110.668
If structured propositions are logical procedures then how are procedures individuated?
This paper deals with two issues. First, it identifies structured propositions with logical procedures. Second, it considers various rigorous definitions of the granularity of procedures, hence also of structured propositions, and comes out in favour of one of them. As for the first point, structured propositions are explicated as algorithmically structured procedures. I show that these procedures are structured wholes that are assigned to expressions as their meanings, and their constituents are sub-procedures occurring in executed mode (as opposed to displayed mode). Moreover, procedures are not mere aggregates of their parts; rather, procedural constituents mutually interact. As for the second point, there is no universal criterion of the structural isomorphism of meanings, hence of co-hyperintensionality, hence of synonymy for every kind of language. The positive result I present is an ordered set of rigorously defined criteria of fine-grained individuation in terms of the structure of procedures. Hence procedural semantics provides a solution to the problem of the granularity of co-hyperintensionality
Deduction in TIL: from simple to ramified hierarchy of types
Tichý’s Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL) is an overarching logical
framework apt for the analysis of all sorts of discourse, whether colloquial, scientific,
mathematical or logical. The theory is a procedural (as opposed to denotational) one, according
to which the meaning of an expression is an abstract, extra-linguistic procedure
detailing what operations to apply to what procedural constituents to arrive at the product
(if any) of the procedure that is the object denoted by the expression. Such procedures
are rigorously defined as TIL constructions. Though TIL analytical potential is
very large, deduction in TIL has been rather neglected. Tichý defined a sequent calculus
for pre-1988 TIL, that is TIL based on the simple theory of types. Since then no
other attempt to define a proof calculus for TIL has been presented. The goal of this
paper is to propose a generalization and adjustment of Tichý’s calculus to TIL 2010.
First I briefly recapitulate the rules of simple-typed calculus as presented by Tichý.
Then I propose the adjustments of the calculus so that it be applicable to hyperintensions
within the ramified hierarchy of types. TIL operates with a single procedural semantics
for all kinds of logical-semantic context, be it extensional, intensional or hyperintensional.
I show that operating in a hyperintensional context is far from being technically
trivial. Yet it is feasible. To this end we introduce a substitution method that
operates on hyperintensions. It makes use of a four-place substitution function (called
Sub) defined over hyperintensions.Web of Science20suppl 236
If structured propositions are logical procedures then how are procedures individuated?
This paper deals with two issues. First, it identifies structured propositions with logical procedures. Second, it considers various rigorous definitions of the granularity of procedures, hence also of structured propositions, and comes out in favour of one of them. As for the first point, structured propositions are explicated as algorithmically structured procedures. I show that these procedures are structured wholes that are assigned to expressions as their meanings, and their constituents are sub-procedures occurring in executed mode (as opposed to displayed mode). Moreover, procedures are not mere aggregates of their parts; rather, procedural constituents mutually interact. As for the second point, there is no universal criterion of the structural isomorphism of meanings, hence of co-hyperintensionality, hence of synonymy for every kind of language. The positive result I present is an ordered set of rigorously defined criteria of fine-grained individuation in terms of the structure of procedures. Hence procedural semantics provides a solution to the problem of the granularity of co-hyperintensionality
- …