Neutrality: A Necessity for Self-Adaptation

Self-adaptation is used in all main paradigms of evolutionary computation to increase efficiency. We claim that the basis of self-adaptation is the use of neutrality. In the absence of external control neutrality allows a variation of the search distribution without the risk of fitness loss.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, LaTe

Maximum Likelihood-based Online Adaptation of Hyper-parameters in CMA-ES

The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is widely accepted as a robust derivative-free continuous optimization algorithm for non-linear and non-convex optimization problems. CMA-ES is well known to be almost parameterless, meaning that only one hyper-parameter, the population size, is proposed to be tuned by the user. In this paper, we propose a principled approach called self-CMA-ES to achieve the online adaptation of CMA-ES hyper-parameters in order to improve its overall performance. Experimental results show that for larger-than-default population size, the default settings of hyper-parameters of CMA-ES are far from being optimal, and that self-CMA-ES allows for dynamically approaching optimal settings.Comment: 13th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2014) (2014

A Computationally Efficient Limited Memory CMA-ES for Large Scale Optimization

We propose a computationally efficient limited memory Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for large scale optimization, which we call the LM-CMA-ES. The LM-CMA-ES is a stochastic, derivative-free algorithm for numerical optimization of non-linear, non-convex optimization problems in continuous domain. Inspired by the limited memory BFGS method of Liu and Nocedal (1989), the LM-CMA-ES samples candidate solutions according to a covariance matrix reproduced from $m$ direction vectors selected during the optimization process. The decomposition of the covariance matrix into Cholesky factors allows to reduce the time and memory complexity of the sampling to $O(mn)$, where $n$ is the number of decision variables. When $n$ is large (e.g., $n$ > 1000), even relatively small values of $m$ (e.g., $m=20,30$) are sufficient to efficiently solve fully non-separable problems and to reduce the overall run-time.Comment: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO'2014) (2014

Adaptive Ranking Based Constraint Handling for Explicitly Constrained Black-Box Optimization

A novel explicit constraint handling technique for the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) is proposed. The proposed constraint handling exhibits two invariance properties. One is the invariance to arbitrary element-wise increasing transformation of the objective and constraint functions. The other is the invariance to arbitrary affine transformation of the search space. The proposed technique virtually transforms a constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained optimization problem by considering an adaptive weighted sum of the ranking of the objective function values and the ranking of the constraint violations that are measured by the Mahalanobis distance between each candidate solution to its projection onto the boundary of the constraints. Simulation results are presented and show that the CMA-ES with the proposed constraint handling exhibits the affine invariance and performs similarly to the CMA-ES on unconstrained counterparts.Comment: 9 page

Qualms Regarding the Optimality of Cumulative Path Length Control in CSA/CMA-Evolution Strategies

The cumulative step-size adaptation (CSA) based on path length control is regarded as a robust alternative to the standard mutative self-adaptation technique in evolution strategies (ES), guaranteeing an almost optimal control of the mutation operator. In this short paper it is shown that the underlying basic assumption in CSA - the perpendicularity of expected consecutive steps - does not necessarily guarantee optimal progress performance for (...)intermediate recombinative ES