6 research outputs found

    Использование PNK–метода для решения невыпуклых задач оптимизации

    No full text
    Рассматривается возможность решения невыпуклых задач оптимизации PNK-методом, использующим переменную кусочно-линейную аппроксимацию функций и подбирающим точный штрафной множитель при наличии ограничений. Изучаются условия сходимости метода к локальному оптимуму в случае невыпуклости. Приводятся результаты вычислительных экспериментов.Розглядається можливість розв’язання неопуклих задач оптимізації PNK-методом, яких використовує змінну частково-лінійну апроксимацію функцій та знаходить точний штрафний множник у разі наявності обмежень. Вивчаються умови збіжності метода до локального оптимуму у випадку, що розглядається. Наводяться результати обчислювальних експериментів.An opportunity for solving nonconvex optimization problems by PNK-method is considered. This method uses variable piecewise linear approximation for functions and finds exact penalty multiplier for constraints. Convergence conditions to local optimum are studied. Results of computational experiments are adde

    On multiobjective optimization from the nonsmooth perspective

    Get PDF
    Practical applications usually have multiobjective nature rather than having only one objective to optimize. A multiobjective problem cannot be solved with a single-objective solver as such. On the other hand, optimization of only one objective may lead to an arbitrary bad solutions with respect to other objectives. Therefore, special techniques for multiobjective optimization are vital. In addition to multiobjective nature, many real-life problems have nonsmooth (i.e. not continuously differentiable) structure. Unfortunately, many smooth (i.e. continuously differentiable) methods adopt gradient-based information which cannot be used for nonsmooth problems. Since both of these characteristics are relevant for applications, we focus here on nonsmooth multiobjective optimization. As a research topic, nonsmooth multiobjective optimization has gained only limited attraction while the fields of nonsmooth single-objective and smooth multiobjective optimization distinctively have attained greater interest. This dissertation covers parts of nonsmooth multiobjective optimization in terms of theory, methodology and application. Bundle methods are widely considered as effective and reliable solvers for single-objective nonsmooth optimization. Therefore, we investigate the use of the bundle idea in the multiobjective framework with three different methods. The first one generalizes the single-objective proximal bundle method for the nonconvex multiobjective constrained problem. The second method adopts the ideas from the classical steepest descent method into the convex unconstrained multiobjective case. The third method is designed for multiobjective problems with constraints where both the objectives and constraints can be represented as a difference of convex (DC) functions. Beside the bundle idea, all three methods are descent, meaning that they produce better values for each objective at each iteration. Furthermore, all of them utilize the improvement function either directly or indirectly. A notable fact is that none of these methods use scalarization in the traditional sense. With the scalarization we refer to the techniques transforming a multiobjective problem into the single-objective one. As the scalarization plays an important role in multiobjective optimization, we present one special family of achievement scalarizing functions as a representative of this category. In general, the achievement scalarizing functions suit well in the interactive framework. Thus, we propose the interactive method using our special family of achievement scalarizing functions. In addition, this method utilizes the above mentioned descent methods as tools to illustrate the range of optimal solutions. Finally, this interactive method is used to solve the practical case studies of the scheduling the final disposal of the spent nuclear fuel in Finland.Käytännön optimointisovellukset ovat usein luonteeltaan ennemmin moni- kuin yksitavoitteisia. Erityisesti monitavoitteisille tehtäville suunnitellut menetelmät ovat tarpeen, sillä monitavoitteista optimointitehtävää ei sellaisenaan pysty ratkaisemaan yksitavoitteisilla menetelmillä eikä vain yhden tavoitteen optimointi välttämättä tuota mielekästä ratkaisua muiden tavoitteiden suhteen. Monitavoitteisuuden lisäksi useat käytännön tehtävät ovat myös epäsileitä siten, etteivät niissä esiintyvät kohde- ja rajoitefunktiot välttämättä ole kaikkialla jatkuvasti differentioituvia. Kuitenkin monet optimointimenetelmät hyödyntävät gradienttiin pohjautuvaa tietoa, jota ei epäsileille funktioille ole saatavissa. Näiden molempien ominaisuuksien ollessa keskeisiä sovelluksia ajatellen, keskitytään tässä työssä epäsileään monitavoiteoptimointiin. Tutkimusalana epäsileä monitavoiteoptimointi on saanut vain vähän huomiota osakseen, vaikka sekä sileä monitavoiteoptimointi että yksitavoitteinen epäsileä optimointi erikseen ovat aktiivisia tutkimusaloja. Tässä työssä epäsileää monitavoiteoptimointia on käsitelty niin teorian, menetelmien kuin käytännön sovelluksien kannalta. Kimppumenetelmiä pidetään yleisesti tehokkaina ja luotettavina menetelminä epäsileän optimointitehtävän ratkaisemiseen ja siksi tätä ajatusta hyödynnetään myös tässä väitöskirjassa kolmessa eri menetelmässä. Ensimmäinen näistä yleistää yksitavoitteisen proksimaalisen kimppumenetelmän epäkonveksille monitavoitteiselle rajoitteiselle tehtävälle sopivaksi. Toinen menetelmä hyödyntää klassisen nopeimman laskeutumisen menetelmän ideaa konveksille rajoitteettomalle tehtävälle. Kolmas menetelmä on suunniteltu erityisesti monitavoitteisille rajoitteisille tehtäville, joiden kohde- ja rajoitefunktiot voidaan ilmaista kahden konveksin funktion erotuksena. Kimppuajatuksen lisäksi kaikki kolme menetelmää ovat laskevia eli ne tuottavat joka kierroksella paremman arvon jokaiselle tavoitteelle. Yhteistä on myös se, että nämä kaikki hyödyntävät parannusfunktiota joko suoraan sellaisenaan tai epäsuorasti. Huomattavaa on, ettei yksikään näistä menetelmistä hyödynnä skalarisointia perinteisessä merkityksessään. Skalarisoinnilla viitataan menetelmiin, joissa usean tavoitteen tehtävä on muutettu sopivaksi yksitavoitteiseksi tehtäväksi. Monitavoiteoptimointimenetelmien joukossa skalarisoinnilla on vankka jalansija. Esimerkkinä skalarisoinnista tässä työssä esitellään yksi saavuttavien skalarisointifunktioiden perhe. Yleisesti saavuttavat skalarisointifunktiot soveltuvat hyvin interaktiivisten menetelmien rakennuspalikoiksi. Täten kuvaillaan myös esiteltyä skalarisointifunktioiden perhettä hyödyntävä interaktiivinen menetelmä, joka lisäksi hyödyntää laskevia menetelmiä optimaalisten ratkaisujen havainnollistamisen apuna. Lopuksi tätä interaktiivista menetelmää käytetään aikatauluttamaan käytetyn ydinpolttoaineen loppusijoitusta Suomessa

    Hyperbolic smoothing in nonsmooth optimization and applications

    Get PDF
    Nonsmooth nonconvex optimization problems arise in many applications including economics, business and data mining. In these applications objective functions are not necessarily differentiable or convex. Many algorithms have been proposed over the past three decades to solve such problems. In spite of the significant growth in this field, the development of efficient algorithms for solving this kind of problem is still a challenging task. The subgradient method is one of the simplest methods developed for solving these problems. Its convergence was proved only for convex objective functions. This method does not involve any subproblems, neither for finding search directions nor for computation of step lengths, which are fixed ahead of time. Bundle methods and their various modifications are among the most efficient methods for solving nonsmooth optimization problems. These methods involve a quadratic programming subproblem to find search directions. The size of the subproblem may increase significantly with the number of variables, which makes the bundle-type methods unsuitable for large scale nonsmooth optimization problems. The implementation of bundle-type methods, which require the use of the quadratic programming solvers, is not as easy as the implementation of the subgradient methods. Therefore it is beneficial to develop algorithms for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization which are easy to implement and more efficient than the subgradient methods. In this thesis, we develop two new algorithms for solving nonsmooth nonconvex optimization problems based on the use of the hyperbolic smoothing technique and apply them to solve the pumping cost minimization problem in water distribution. Both algorithms use smoothing techniques. The first algorithm is designed for solving finite minimax problems. In order to apply the hyperbolic smoothing we reformulate the objective function in the minimax problem and study the relationship between the original minimax and reformulated problems. We also study the main properties of the hyperbolic smoothing function. Based on these results an algorithm for solving the finite minimax problem is proposed and this algorithm is implemented in GAMS. We present preliminary results of numerical experiments with well-known nonsmooth optimization test problems. We also compare the proposed algorithm with the algorithm that uses the exponential smoothing function as well as with the algorithm based on nonlinear programming reformulation of the finite minimax problem. The second nonsmooth optimization algorithm we developed was used to demonstrate how smooth optimization methods can be applied to solve general nonsmooth (nonconvex) optimization problems. In order to do so we compute subgradients from some neighborhood of the current point and define a system of linear inequalities using these subgradients. Search directions are computed by solving this system. This system is solved by reducing it to the minimization of the convex piecewise linear function over the unit ball. Then the hyperbolic smoothing function is applied to approximate this minimization problem by a sequence of smooth problems which are solved by smooth optimization methods. Such an approach allows one to apply powerful smooth optimization algorithms for solving nonsmooth optimization problems and extend smoothing techniques for solving general nonsmooth nonconvex optimization problems. The convergence of the algorithm based on this approach is studied. The proposed algorithm was implemented in Fortran 95. Preliminary results of numerical experiments are reported and the proposed algorithm is compared with an other five nonsmooth optimization algorithms. We also implement the algorithm in GAMS and compare it with GAMS solvers using results of numerical experiments.Doctor of Philosoph

    Técnicas amostrais para otimização não suave

    Get PDF
    Orientadores: Sandra Augusta Santos, Elias Salomão Helou NetoTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Matemática Estatística e Computação CientíficaResumo: O método amostral de gradientes (GS) é um algoritmo recentemente desenvolvido para resolver problemas de otimização não suave. Fazendo uso de informações de primeira ordem da função objetivo, este método generaliza o método de máxima descida, um dos clássicos algoritmos para minimização de funções suaves. Este estudo tem como objetivo desenvolver e explorar diferentes métodos amostrais para a otimização numérica de funções não suaves. Inicialmente, provamos que é possível ter uma convergência global para o método GS na ausência do procedimento chamado "teste de diferenciabilidade". Posteriormente, apresentamos condições que devem ser esperadas para a obtenção de uma taxa de convergência local linear do método GS. Finalmente, um novo método amostral com convergência local superlinear é apresentado, o qual se baseia não somente no cálculo de gradientes, mas também nos valores da função objetivo nos pontos sorteadosAbstract: The Gradient Sampling (GS) method is a recently developed tool for solving unconstrained nonsmooth optimization problems. Using just first order information of the objective function, it generalizes the steepest descent method, one of the most classical methods for minimizing a smooth function. This study aims at developing and exploring different sampling algorithms for the numerical optimization of nonsmooth functions. First, we prove that it is possible to have a global convergence result for the GS method in the abscence of the differentiability check procedure. Second, we prove in which circumstances one can expect the GS method to have a linear convergence rate. Lastly, a new sampling algorithm with superlinear convergence is presented, which rests not only upon the gradient but also on the objective function value at the sampled pointsDoutoradoMatematica AplicadaDoutor em Matemática Aplicada2013/14615-7CAPESFAPES
    corecore